# 💭 Title 💬 👥 🙋 Last editor 🕒 (UTC)
1 Cewbot - Normalize multiple issue templates 3 2 JoeNMLC 2024-04-21 13:24
2 Broken anchor fixes 3 2 Kanashimi 2024-04-21 22:42
3 Kanashimi 1 1 86.33.77.195 2024-04-24 17:05
4 Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link 2 2 Kanashimi 2024-04-27 00:19
Legend
  • In the last hour
  • In the last day
  • In the last week
  • In the last month
  • More than one month
Manual settings
When exceptions occur,
please check the setting first.

Cewbot - Normalize multiple issue templates edit

Greetings, Today I'm seeing Cewbot removing "Issues" from articles with two maintenance templates. It should not be doing this. Examples: here and here. Because the Orphan tag "disappears" after two months, does this mean article needs 3 tags to keep Orphan tag visible? Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think it's because {{Refimprove section}} isn't in User:Cewbot/log/20150916/configuration#Maintenance template list and right, template_count_to_be_merged=3. Kanashimi (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the answer. It was my error, I changed those two from "Refimprove section" to just "Refimprove" instead. Wondering why "Refimprove" is missing from the bot Maint. list? JoeNMLC (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Broken anchor fixes edit

Hi Kanashimi! I noticed Special:Diff/1219970705, and I just wanted to check whether or not this task should be running in namespaces other than mainspace. All the best :) ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 07:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Taking a brief look through Cewbot’s contribs, I’ve also noticed things like Special:Diff/1219980350, Special:Diff/1219981528 & Special:Diff/1219981912, which I’m not sure if Cewbot should be doing. All the best. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 07:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think this is due to the editing that occurs when the robot processes the archive page. (See Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 86#Fixing broken links to talk page discussions and `archive_template_list` @ User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration.) Perhaps we can review what the limitations are? Kanashimi (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kanashimi edit

@ 86.33.77.195 (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link edit

I just reverted this bit of silliness. I don't think a bot is capable of determining the appropriateness of an ILL. Certainly this one thought a footballer was ruling 18th-century Algiers. Elinruby (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the report.   Fixed. Kanashimi (talk) 00:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
How did you fix it exactly? Elinruby (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll list this page here. Kanashimi (talk) 07:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was looking at that page. It looks like somebody already fixed "La reveil anarchiste" for you. which I was thinking of hitting as low-hanging fruit. I can fix some of the other entries probably if you want me to, but don't you want them struck from the list when they are fixed? Also, as a frequent user of the ILL template, the fact that an English-language article exists is not always a good reason for changing it IMHO.
But in this particular case, please don't list it there; all the Ottoman-era figures 9f Algiers have multiple names and somebody, possibly me, linked to the wrong one. He actually has an article at fr:Baba Abdi and I will fix the link. I remain concerned about the premise of the bot run however. Sometimes the English article is deliberately not linked to. Elinruby (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Feel free to help fix them. This page is updated once per week, and templates that have been fixed should not appear again next week.
What items do you think should not be listed? I'm sorry I'm not sure I understand. Could you describe them more plainly? Kanashimi (talk) 08:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply