Kanashimi
|
|
|
# | 💭 Title | 💬 | 👥 | 🙋 Last editor | 🕒 (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cewbot - Normalize multiple issue templates | 3 | 2 | JoeNMLC | 2024-04-21 13:24 |
2 | Broken anchor fixes | 3 | 2 | Kanashimi | 2024-04-21 22:42 |
3 | Kanashimi | 1 | 1 | 86.33.77.195 | 2024-04-24 17:05 |
4 | Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link | 2 | 2 | Kanashimi | 2024-04-27 00:19 |
Legend |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual settings |
When exceptions occur, please check the setting first. |
Cewbot - Normalize multiple issue templates edit
Greetings, Today I'm seeing Cewbot removing "Issues" from articles with two maintenance templates. It should not be doing this. Examples: here and here. Because the Orphan tag "disappears" after two months, does this mean article needs 3 tags to keep Orphan tag visible? Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's because {{Refimprove section}} isn't in User:Cewbot/log/20150916/configuration#Maintenance template list and right, template_count_to_be_merged=3. Kanashimi (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Broken anchor fixes edit
Hi Kanashimi! I noticed Special:Diff/1219970705, and I just wanted to check whether or not this task should be running in namespaces other than mainspace. All the best :) —a smart kitten[meow] 07:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Taking a brief look through Cewbot’s contribs, I’ve also noticed things like Special:Diff/1219980350, Special:Diff/1219981528 & Special:Diff/1219981912, which I’m not sure if Cewbot should be doing. All the best. —a smart kitten[meow] 07:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is due to the editing that occurs when the robot processes the archive page. (See Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 86#Fixing broken links to talk page discussions and `archive_template_list` @ User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration.) Perhaps we can review what the limitations are? Kanashimi (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Kanashimi edit
@ 86.33.77.195 (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Sometimes there is a reason for the ILL link edit
I just reverted this bit of silliness. I don't think a bot is capable of determining the appropriateness of an ILL. Certainly this one thought a footballer was ruling 18th-century Algiers. Elinruby (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- How did you fix it exactly? Elinruby (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'll list this page here. Kanashimi (talk) 07:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was looking at that page. It looks like somebody already fixed "La reveil anarchiste" for you. which I was thinking of hitting as low-hanging fruit. I can fix some of the other entries probably if you want me to, but don't you want them struck from the list when they are fixed? Also, as a frequent user of the ILL template, the fact that an English-language article exists is not always a good reason for changing it IMHO.
- But in this particular case, please don't list it there; all the Ottoman-era figures 9f Algiers have multiple names and somebody, possibly me, linked to the wrong one. He actually has an article at fr:Baba Abdi and I will fix the link. I remain concerned about the premise of the bot run however. Sometimes the English article is deliberately not linked to. Elinruby (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- How did you fix it exactly? Elinruby (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)