Talk:Japanese battleship Ise
 | Japanese battleship Ise is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Japanese battleship Ise is part of the Battleships of Japan series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese battleship Ise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
I apologize, forgot to mention in edit that I added the picture of the sunken Ise.RebelAt 03:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Attack on 6/24/45 edit
The USS Ranger could not have launched the 60 aircraft that attacked Ise on June 24th because:
1. Ranger could not carry 60 aircraft.
2. Ranger never operated as part of the 3rd Fleet. She spent all of 1945 as a training carrier, in home waters.
Various edit
Good article for the most part, but why does it call the Vickers pom-pom gun an "AT/AA" gun? That means "anti-tank/anti-aircraft" gun. Calling the Type 96 25mm an "AT" gun can barely be justified because it in fact saw some very limited use as one, but I can't imagine a stubby-barreled, heavy, low-velocity Vickers 40mm being used as an AT gun. Did someone assume that because the Type 96 was called an "AT/AA gun", that that was what the Japanese called their AA guns? AnnaGoFast (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)