Talk:City Museum

Copyright violation

Several photos have been included on this site that appear to be a direct copyright violation from the City Museum website. We cannot include copyrighted photos on a Wikipedia article without permission per the copyright policy. If you have permission to use these photos please explain. Otherwise, please do not add the photos back. Thank you. TMS63112 22:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

actualy im not so sure about that...they just dont look like pictures from their website...Hawkey131 (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Petra Caves photo?

Is that part of the museum as opposed to Petra? dm (talk) 05:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Well I removed it because it's certainly not a pic of the city museum. I can't confirm if it is Petra. Good catch. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

The roof section - poorly written

Here's an attempt at a re-write, mainly of the school bus portion, based on a personal trip there last week: The roof contains a former school bus, positioned such that the front end of the bus is cantilevered over the parking lot, eleven floors below. The seats in the bus have been repositioned to form two long benches down the length of the bus, under the windows. The drivers seat is accessible for sitting behind the steering wheel, with the front door is blocked by a cage. Last updated= Monday, April 20, 2015

Why is there a Neutrality notice on this article?

The neutrality notice claims that there is a dispute and that there is discussion about the dispute on this talk page. But there does not appear to be a dispute. Should the notice be removed? Should the neutrality be discussed? 69.181.168.139 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Boldly removing the tag. Happy to put it back if discussion surfaces. PRRfan (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

The notice is still there, dated Feb 2017, but its unclear why and the 4 years old talk about it here is similarly unclear on what the neutrality issue is, so conditions 2 and 3 for removing the notice seem to be met. Removing.80.215.210.51 (talk) 06:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Seems perfectly valid to me. Grey Wanderer (talk) 01:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on City Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324202155/http://www.citymuseum.org/lofts.html to http://www.citymuseum.org/lofts.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080322033431/http://www.citymuseum.org/allattractions.html to http://www.citymuseum.org/allattractions.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511090557/http://citymuseum.org/cabininnrent.html to http://www.citymuseum.org/cabininnrent.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)