Wikipedia:WikiProject Missouri/Assessment

      Missouri articles by quality and importance
      Quality Importance
      Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
      Featured article FA 3 4 7 14
      Featured list FL 3 3 6
      A-Class article A 1 1
      GA 2 2 3 21 9 37
      B 5 11 44 65 70 195
      C 5 13 57 100 87 262
      Start 7 45 388 886 533 1,859
      Stub 6 218 1,990 1,184 3,398
      List 4 17 42 1 72 136
      Category 2,247 2,247
      Disambig 6 6
      File 14 14
      Portal 2 2
      Project 7 7
      Template 326 326
      NA 1 2 39 44 86
      Assessed 19 85 736 3,154 2,647 1,955 8,596
      Unassessed 2 1,565 1,567
      Total 19 85 736 3,156 2,647 3,520 10,163
      WikiWork factors (?) ω = 700431325000000000031,325 Ω = 5.45

      Welcome to the assessment department of the Missouri WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Missouri. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

      The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Missouri articles by quality and Category:Missouri articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

      Frequently asked questions

      How can I get my article rated? 
      Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
      Who can assess articles? 
      Any member of the Missouri WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
      What if I don't agree with a rating? 
      You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
      Aren't the ratings subjective? 
      Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

      If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

      ↑Jump back a section

      Instructions

      An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner on its talk page:

      {{WikiProject Missouri
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

      The following values may be used for the class parameter:

      Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class Missouri articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

      Quality scale

      WikiProject article quality grading scheme
      Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
      Featured article FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. L'incoronazione di Poppea
      (as of August 2010)
      A-Class article A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. Peer review may help. 102nd Intelligence Wing
      (as of March 2010)
       GA  The article has attained good article status by passing an official review. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Usain Bolt
      (as of November 2009)
      B-Class article B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. KV55
      (as of November 2009)
      C-Class article C  The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Architecture of Sweden
      (as of May 2009)
      Start-Class article Start  An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Real analysis
      (as of November 2006)
      Stub-Class article Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. Geodia gibberosa
      (as of July 2009)
      Featured list FL  The article has attained featured list status. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
      (as of December 2012)
       List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of aikidoka
      (as of June 2007)

      Importance assessment

      An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner on its talk page:

      {{WikiProject Missouri| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
      Top
      High
      Mid
      Low
      ???

      The following values may be used for importance assessments:

      Importance scale

      The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Missouri.

      Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to certain audiences—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

      Status Template Meaning of Status
      Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
      High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
      Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
      Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
      None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

      Requesting an assessment

      If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

      1. Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 00:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
      2. Jason Holsman - Article needs assessment. -- 09:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
      ↑Jump back a section

      Assessment log

      Missouri articles:
      Index · Statistics · Log
      The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

      Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

      This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.

      June 18, 2013

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      June 17, 2013

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      June 16, 2013

      Reassessed

      • KCTV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
      • KMBC-TV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • KMCI-TV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
      • KPLR-TV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • KSDK (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • KSHB-TV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • KSMO-TV (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
      • KTVI (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

      Assessed

      Removed

      June 15, 2013

      Reassessed

      • Capaha Field (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

      Assessed

      June 14, 2013

      Renamed

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      June 13, 2013

      Reassessed

      June 12, 2013

      Reassessed

      • Human Arts Ensemble (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
      • Paseo Bridge (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

      June 11, 2013

      Renamed

      Assessed

      June 10, 2013

      Reassessed

      June 9, 2013

      Assessed

      June 7, 2013

      Assessed

      June 6, 2013

      Assessed

      June 5, 2013

      Reassessed

      June 4, 2013

      Assessed

      Removed

      • Category:Saint Louis City, Missouri geography stubs (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).

      June 3, 2013

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      June 2, 2013

      Renamed

      Assessed

      May 30, 2013

      Renamed

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      May 29, 2013

      Renamed

      Reassessed

      • Billiken Sports Center (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • John Caspar Wild (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • Second Hannibal Bridge (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

      Assessed

      • 1896 St. Louis–East St. Louis tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • Greensfelder County Park (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • John Q. Hammons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • List of hospitals in St. Louis, Missouri (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • Mike Kickham (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • Missouri State University–West Plains (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
      • Tommy Layne (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2001 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2002 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2003 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2004 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2005 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2006 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :St. Louis Rams 2011 draft navbox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Branson, Missouri micropolitan area (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Kirksville, Missouri micropolitan area (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Wikipedia meetups in St. Louis, Missouri (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

      Removed

      • :Branson micropolitan area (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Kirksville micropolitan area (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Leaders of counties in Missouri (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • :Wikipedia meetups in St. Louis (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).

      May 28, 2013

      Renamed

      Assessed

      Removed

      • Category:Branson micropolitan area (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • Category:Kirksville micropolitan area (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • Category:Wikipedia meetups in St. Louis (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).

      May 27, 2013

      Renamed

      Reassessed

      • Billiken Sports Center (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • Charles A. Holland (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
      • John Caspar Wild (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

      Assessed

      Removed

      • Category:Heritage registers in Missouri (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      • Category:Leaders of counties in Missouri (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).

      May 26, 2013

      Assessed

      May 23, 2013

      Assessed

      May 23, 2013

      Assessed

      May 22, 2013

      Reassessed

      Assessed

      Removed

      • Category:People from Saint Francois County, Missouri (talk) removed. Quality rating was Category-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was NA-Class (rev · t).
      ↑Jump back a section

      Worklist

      The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

      This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.

      ↑Jump back a section
      Last modified on 12 January 2013, at 09:39