Talk:Baby Ray

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot (talk) 18:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Updated importance ratings edit

I updated the importance ratings for WP:NFL and WP:GNB to "High", due to Ray's inclusion on the 1940's All-Decade team and in the Packers HoF. I also removed the Stub class rating, as I have greatly expanded the article, and it should be reassessed soon. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 22:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baby Ray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply