Wilful fire raising
The offence is not fully equivalent to the offence of arson in England and Wales. The difference is that wilful fire-raising only covers fires that were started deliberately. The English-Welsh offence of arson can include cases where the fire was not entirely deliberate but made possible through malicious or reckless behaviour. In Scots law, if a fire is the result of an act of recklessness then the offence of culpable and reckless conduct applies. It is common to find both offences charged together where criminal events involve fire and both offences carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. In practice, wilful fire-raising is often treated as being equivalent to arson for some purposes such as statistics.
Prior to the case of Byrne v H.M. Advocate (No. 2) there was a distinction between “wilful fire-raising” and “culpable and reckless fire-raising”. The former dealt with heritable property (e.g. buildings, trees, crops) while the latter dealt with other property. That case determined that fire-raising (in a criminal context) would be either wilful or reckless (distinct from English statute law  which places both together).
- "Fire: Raising the Standard". scotland.gov.uk.
- 2000 JC 155; 2000 SCCR 77; 2000 SLT 233
- A Draft Criminal Code for Scotland with Commentary, pub. Scottish Law Commission 2003
- s.1 Criminal Damage Act 1971
- Mike Watson, Baron Watson of Invergowrie, convicted of wilful fire raising at the Scottish Politician of the Year awards in 2004
|This article related to law in Scotland is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This article about a criminal law topic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|