Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Labels/Assessment

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I think that we should give importance to to articles. My proposal:

Top priority: Those record labels which are internationally known, and have had a profound impact on the history of recorded sound. Examples: RCA Victor, Columbia, His Masters Voice.

High priority: Those record labels which are generally well known, having a long history of strong sales and musical and/or industry influence. Examples: Warner Brothers, Edison, Parlophone, Arista.

Mid priority: Those record labels having numerous hits or having a profound impact on a particular field of music. Examples: Rounder, Aladdin, Banner (1920s)

Low priority: All other notable labels.

Additional input appreciated! 78.26 (talk) 01:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Will do! Devin Davis (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

seeing no discussion since, I'm moving this to the project page. Further ideas welcome (and needed!) 78.26 (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Draft: Rajmuzik Studio edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi plz review my Draft Rajmuzik Studio . If changes required plz suggest me . I wil try to give my best. I love music . 1234prifixer (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft Aztec Records edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I would like to find people who want to collaborate in the extension of the Draft Aztec Records. There is a great list of references in the talk page, thanks--RafiUbeda (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic