Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History of Biology/Archive 1


Potential participants

edit

Just spotted this project. You might like to invite user:smallweed and User:Valérie75(fr:User:Valérie75) Shyamal 05:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

History of genetics

edit

Why should we expand timelines into prose? In my opinion, a timeline picture could be included, but prose would be too long... NCurse work 12:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Project directory

edit

Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 23:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Charles Darwin FAC

edit

Feel welcome to comment: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Charles Darwin. Samsara (talk  contribs) 17:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Day Awards

edit

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

edit

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Archived a few threads

edit

I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject X is live!

edit
 

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

New Article: Fixity of Species

edit

Article Start: User:Pbarnes/fixity of species

Does anyone feel fixity of species is a notable enough topic for an article? It was the primary belief in biology prior to Darwin's work and is useful to know when studying the history of taxonomy and other fields that were based heavily on this assumption. I'm having trouble creating an article because many people feel this is the same as creationism but this is more of a scientific assumption than a religious dogma. I feel this article will be similar to articles of other scientific assumptions such as flat earth and geocentricism. Voice your opinion and maybe the admins will let this article exist. Pbarnes 05:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Homing

edit

Where could I find information about the history of homing? I'm thinking I would want to have a section about that when I create the article (right now I'm making it in my sandbox). --Cynops3 15:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply