Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Civil engineering/Assessment

Beach Nourishment

edit

I would like to revamp the "beach nourishment" page. I also have a COI. I would appreciate it, if someone could review my edit in a timely manner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Beach_nourishment Under Beach Nourishment Revamp. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. Weissmax25 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why no "Importance" section?

edit

One could look like the following example adapted from Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Assessment:

Importance assessment

edit
Basic syntax

{{Civll Engineering| class=stub | importance=Low}}

  • The word "importance" to start with a lowercase i. Values start with Uppercase, eg. Low

Need: The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality

Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia Regional and historic engineering techniques, world famous civil engineers and works of civll engineering; "Most famous or innovative, or otherwise notable." may appear in the text; article that covers several topics
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge Very important civll engineering projects and noteworthy civll engineers
Mid Subject fills in more minor details Interesting civll engineering projects and civll engineers
Low Subject is mainly of specialist interest Other civll engineering-related topics
NA Not Applicable Used for lists
None Unassessed Unassessed-importance Civll Engineering articles


User:HopsonRoad 02:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply