Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Civil engineering/Assessment
Latest comment: 11 years ago by HopsonRoad in topic Why no "Importance" section?
 | Civil engineering NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Beach Nourishment edit
I would like to revamp the "beach nourishment" page. I also have a COI. I would appreciate it, if someone could review my edit in a timely manner. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Beach_nourishment Under Beach Nourishment Revamp. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. Weissmax25 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Why no "Importance" section? edit
One could look like the following example adapted from Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Assessment:
Importance assessment edit
- Basic syntax
{{Civll Engineering| class=stub | importance=Low}}
- The word "importance" to start with a lowercase i. Values start with Uppercase, eg. Low
Need: The article's priority or importance, regardless of its quality
| Top | Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia | Regional and historic engineering techniques, world famous civil engineers and works of civll engineering; "Most famous or innovative, or otherwise notable." may appear in the text; article that covers several topics |
| High | Subject contributes a depth of knowledge | Very important civll engineering projects and noteworthy civll engineers |
| Mid | Subject fills in more minor details | Interesting civll engineering projects and civll engineers |
| Low | Subject is mainly of specialist interest | Other civll engineering-related topics |
| NA | Not Applicable | Used for lists |
| None | Unassessed | Unassessed-importance Civll Engineering articles |
User:HopsonRoad 02:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)