Wikipedia talk:What isn't grounds for article deletion
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Spoom in topic So what if there are no sources in existence?
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Why I wrote this essay
editI tried to make it not look like a rant. But I'm just sick of people claiming that articles should be deleted, for example, for a lack of sources. If the topic is inappropriate for Wikipedia, just say which guideline applies and thats it! Dark Shikari 18:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
So what if there are no sources in existence?
editYeah... -Amark moo! 01:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Then delete it per WP:V, not WP:CRUFT, since one is policy and the other is not. SpoomTalk 20:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
This page is false
editThis page asserts that certain things are or are not valid per policy, and makes false assertions while doing so. What it means is that the sole author of this page wishes that certain nominations were invalid, whereas in fact there's nothing wrong with them. >Radiant< 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)