Wikipedia talk:Version 0.5 Biography Review

The difference between B and Start Class is primarily content, and I think it's unlikely that articles which have already received a B rating will have lost enough content to drop down a grade; similarly, it's unlikely they will have been improved enough to be considered A Class without having gone through WP:GAC. So, in the interests of time, I think it's best to rely on the ratings already given by various WikiProjects (in many cases, two or more) instead of reviewing each article again. Then we can focus on those articles which have not yet recieved any rating. -- bcasterline • talk 05:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

This is reasonable, by all means. I'm reviewing them quickly anyway, just as a double check, but what you suggest is fine. Sorry I didn't see this earlier! Walkerma 03:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)