Wikipedia talk:User pages/Archive 19

Archive 15 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19

Allow harmless MediaWiki imitations

Please allow imitations of the MediaWiki interface which don't harm the actual one. However, fake notification banners or harmful interface imitations mustn't be allowed. SonicIn2022 (talk)

I've no idea what you mean. Could you provide an example or a more detailed explanation? Schazjmd (talk) 16:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
I suspect it is about Wikipedia:User pages#Simulation and disruption of the MediaWiki interface. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 08:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Removing comments from user talk pages

An editor asked a question of me on my talk page and I gave a reply. Recently, the same editor removed the section [1]. Is this generally allowed? Not bothered either way in this instance, just wondering what the etiquette is. Rupples (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

@Rupples, once you reply, it would be inappropriate for the other editor to remove the whole conversation from your talk page. It's up to you if you want to revert that removal (so the conversation remains and can eventually be archived) or not. Schazjmd (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Good of you to answer. Just realised this page isn't really appropriate for my previous question and was in the process of striking through! I wonder if something along the lines of the following could be added to the opening paragraph of WP:NOBAN? "It is not considered good etiquette to remove conversations from other users' talk pages, without first seeking agreement." Rupples (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
@Rupples, the guidance for talk pages, WP:OWNTALK, says Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. I think in this instance, it's just a fairly new editor who may have thought that was an appropriate way to convey that they'd read your reply and considered the conversation done. They just need WP customs explained to them. Schazjmd (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)