| Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
| Miscellaneous |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1#Miscellaneous
|
| Where to draw the line? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1#Where to draw the line?
|
| Books and movies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1#Books and movies
|
| Consolidation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1#Consolidation
|
| Publications in peer-reviewed journals |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 1#Publications in peer-reviewed journals
|
| Bibliographies and etcographies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Bibliographies and etcographies
|
| Attempts to refute a position |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Attempts to refute a position
|
| Examples too broad; major change |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Examples too broad; major change
|
| New theories |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#New theories
|
| Apple Pie |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Apple Pie
|
| "Appropriate to the subject" |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#"Appropriate to the subject"
|
| An example of officious interference |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#An example of officious interference
|
| NPOV and No original research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#NPOV and No original research
|
| Are we offending someone? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Are we offending someone?
|
| Scientific Data Presentation vs. No Original Research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#Scientific Data Presentation vs. No Original Research
|
| Grocery-story analogy |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Grocery-story analogy
|
| An article about finding research? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#An article about finding research?
|
| Usenet as a secondary source |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Usenet as a secondary source
|
| Grocery-store analogy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Grocery-store analogy
|
| On talk pages addition |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#On talk pages addition
|
| Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RFC
|
| Bludgeon |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Bludgeon
|
| Data Mining |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Data Mining
|
| Cited sources =/= original research-free |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Cited sources =/= original research-free
|
| Clarifications |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Clarifications
|
| Popular culture? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Popular culture?
|
| Confusion over the meaning of original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Confusion over the meaning of original research
|
| Examples are original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Examples are original research
|
| Proposals for exceptions to the policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Proposals for exceptions to the policy
|
| Wikipedia being place for peer-reviewing |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Wikipedia being place for peer-reviewing
|
| Please use talk page before adding content |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Please use talk page before adding content
|
| Data about planets — is some calculation allowed? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Data about planets — is some calculation allowed?
|
| What of describing assertions as non-sensical and other simple logical conclusions? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#What of describing assertions as non-sensical and other simple logical conclusions?
|
| 'Openly' Partisan Sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 2#'Openly' Partisan Sources
|
| Related policies section |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Related policies section
|
| Some concerns with the current NOR article |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Some concerns with the current NOR article
|
| Specific applications |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 3#Specific applications
|
| Important text change that would bring in a new policy on what is original research |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Important text change that would bring in a new policy on what is original research
|
| Do I really have to prove that Einstein's general relativity of 1915 isn't a result of my original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Do I really have to prove that Einstein's general relativity of 1915 isn't a result of my original research?
|
| Published Crackpottery and Apologetics |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Published Crackpottery and Apologetics
|
| Just a little confused |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Just a little confused
|
| Primary/Secondary Vs Original/Not Original |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Primary/Secondary Vs Original/Not Original
|
| Book Review |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Book Review
|
| An attempt to rework this policy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#An attempt to rework this policy
|
| Eyewitness testimony |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Eyewitness testimony
|
| A Proposed ammendment to the "No original research" limitation |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#A Proposed ammendment to the "No original research" limitation
|
| A Proposed Clarification of How NOR Is Employed |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#A Proposed Clarification of How NOR Is Employed
|
| Question: Self contradiction in rules?! |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Question: Self contradiction in rules?!
|
| clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not"
|
| Minorities |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Minorities
|
| transcript of a public hearing |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#transcript of a public hearing
|
| Minorities/Undue weight: clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not" - continued |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Minorities/Undue weight: clarification of "regardless of whether it's true or not" - continued
|
| Descriptive claims |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Descriptive claims
|
| NOR vs. photos made by Wikipedians |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#NOR vs. photos made by Wikipedians
|
| Creative Crackpottery Citing Legitimate Sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Creative Crackpottery Citing Legitimate Sources
|
| Photos which are intended to make a specific point |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Photos which are intended to make a specific point
|
| Original pictures |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Original pictures
|
| Wikipedia doesn't have a factual accuracy policy? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Wikipedia doesn't have a factual accuracy policy?
|
| "...although it is regarded as poor taste to discuss personal theories on talk pages" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#"...although it is regarded as poor taste to discuss personal theories on talk pages"
|
| Would this qualify as OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Would this qualify as OR?
|
| "OR refers to OR by WP editors"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#"OR refers to OR by WP editors"?
|
| Untested theories? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Untested theories?
|
| References/external links name-change proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#References/external links name-change proposal
|
| Original research and disputes of verifibility |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Original research and disputes of verifibility
|
| Limited cases of original vocabulary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Limited cases of original vocabulary
|
| Facts verifiable by Wikipedia readers |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Facts verifiable by Wikipedia readers
|
| Original Research vs Copyright Violation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Original Research vs Copyright Violation
|
| Two Questions |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Two Questions
|
| Bad Policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Bad Policy
|
| Can it be made clearer that there are no exceptions? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Can it be made clearer that there are no exceptions?
|
| Priveleged experts |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Priveleged experts
|
| Problem articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Problem articles
|
| Vehement opposition to this policy, and proposed remedy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Vehement opposition to this policy, and proposed remedy
|
| Citations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Citations
|
| An interesting case |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#An interesting case
|
| Another calculator example |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Another calculator example
|
| Flood of peer-reviewed "facts" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Flood of peer-reviewed "facts"
|
| Personal interviews that were published |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Personal interviews that were published
|
| Is the purpose of this rule to promote propaganda? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Is the purpose of this rule to promote propaganda?
|
| Publishing one's own translations in Wikipedia |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Publishing one's own translations in Wikipedia
|
| Change the name of "original research" to "unsourceable research" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Change the name of "original research" to "unsourceable research"
|
| Need guidance on identifying OR in the case of ..... |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Need guidance on identifying OR in the case of .....
|
| The way the policy is setup is not clear. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#The way the policy is setup is not clear.
|
| "This should include websites"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#"This should include websites"?
|
| Remove citation from talk page? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Remove citation from talk page?
|
| Added some motivation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Added some motivation
|
| How to determine what is a reputable source |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#How to determine what is a reputable source
|
| Bias against sourced research |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Bias against sourced research
|
| More to be said about the role of experts. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#More to be said about the role of experts.
|
| Email to ask question is original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Email to ask question is original research?
|
| More appreciative of the role of experts |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#More appreciative of the role of experts
|
| Jimbo's quote |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Jimbo's quote
|
| Real life example |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Real life example
|
| This is not USENET |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#This is not USENET
|
| Connection with reliable source and verifiability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Connection with reliable source and verifiability
|
| Example of new synthesis of published material |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Example of new synthesis of published material
|
| Original research being allowed? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Original research being allowed?
|
| Primary Vs Secondary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Primary Vs Secondary sources
|
| WP:NOR#Disputes over how established a view is |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#WP:NOR#Disputes over how established a view is
|
| A handful of edits = |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#A handful of edits =
|
| Simplification: removing primary and/or secondary |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Simplification: removing primary and/or secondary
|
| Provide your interpretation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Provide your interpretation
|
| Provide your interpretation |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Provide your interpretation 2
|
| Authority is not a concept in the no original research policy. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 4#Authority is not a concept in the no original research policy.
|
| Confounding NOR and NPOV |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Confounding NOR and NPOV
|
| Erroneous use of "synthesis" in summary |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Erroneous use of "synthesis" in summary
|
| Dispute about the policy in a nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Dispute about the policy in a nutshell
|
| Nutshell wording: continuing |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Nutshell wording: continuing
|
| Synthesis of published material is not in itself original research |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Synthesis of published material is not in itself original research
|
| Original research or novel idea |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Original research or novel idea
|
| Making a phone call? |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Making a phone call?
|
| Discussion of consensus on policy editing privilege |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Discussion of consensus on policy editing privilege
|
| Overstretched definition of “original research”? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Overstretched definition of “original research”?
|
| For Leflyman |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#For Leflyman
|
| Parasite |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Parasite
|
| How to deal with Wikipedia entries about theories |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#How to deal with Wikipedia entries about theories
|
| Revert: please reach consensus before making changes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Revert: please reach consensus before making changes
|
| A turning point in national history |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#A turning point in national history
|
| Source Definitions? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Source Definitions?
|
| When is a theory? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#When is a theory?
|
| Limited Access Publications |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Limited Access Publications
|
| Original consensus formulation |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Original consensus formulation
|
| End run |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#End run
|
| Where is the original discussion for the policy in a nutshell? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Where is the original discussion for the policy in a nutshell?
|
| Synopses of film/video/etc |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Synopses of film/video/etc
|
| Attempt to bypass WP:V and WP:NOR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Attempt to bypass WP:V and WP:NOR
|
| Proposed Example of Synthesis - Restatement |
76 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Proposed Example of Synthesis - Restatement
|
| "to advance a position" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#"to advance a position"
|
| Designed to advance a position |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Designed to advance a position
|
| Protection |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Protection
|
| Absurd? |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Absurd?
|
| WP:ARCHIVES |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#WP:ARCHIVES
|
| Semi-protection time? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Semi-protection time?
|
| SlimVirgin's "Synthesis" point |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#SlimVirgin's "Synthesis" point
|
| Reinterpretation of "Directly Related" |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Reinterpretation of "Directly Related"
|
| Why continue these insults, let us engage in proper discussion to reach consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Why continue these insults, let us engage in proper discussion to reach consensus
|
| Everyone stop... |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Everyone stop...
|
| Protection |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Protection 2
|
| A B S U R D ! |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#A B S U R D !
|
| Protection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Protection 3
|
| Are some articles exempt from this policy? |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Are some articles exempt from this policy?
|
| Attempt to destroy the policy |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Attempt to destroy the policy
|
| Proposal: change Apple Pie example |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Proposal: change Apple Pie example
|
| What's the uproar about? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#What's the uproar about?
|
| Examples |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Examples
|
| Question |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Question
|
| The problem with: "arguments that appears to advance a position" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#The problem with: "arguments that appears to advance a position"
|
| Test Case |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Test Case
|
| Proclamation of protest against policy violation on N.O.R. |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Proclamation of protest against policy violation on N.O.R.
|
| The Mess on WP:NOR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#The Mess on WP:NOR
|
| Changing policy pages to bolster one's own position in an article edit war |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 5#Changing policy pages to bolster one's own position in an article edit war
|
| controversy over authority |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#controversy over authority
|
| Clarification to Top-of-Page Warning |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Clarification to Top-of-Page Warning
|
| Does size always equal quality of reputation or relevance of research? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Does size always equal quality of reputation or relevance of research?
|
| Punctuation correction needed |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Punctuation correction needed
|
| No necessity to cite |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#No necessity to cite
|
| Unprotecting |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Unprotecting
|
| No necessity to cite (second) |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#No necessity to cite (second)
|
| Original information exception |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Original information exception
|
| Tertiary Sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Tertiary Sources
|
| Help with possible original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Help with possible original research
|
| What counts as a reputable publication? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#What counts as a reputable publication?
|
| Sidebar? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Sidebar?
|
| Copyright issues |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Copyright issues
|
| RfC: Interpreting WP:NOR in the context of examples of Mnemonics |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#RfC: Interpreting WP:NOR in the context of examples of Mnemonics
|
| Original research in external links? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Original research in external links?
|
| New synthesis, etc. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#New synthesis, etc.
|
| Help with what constitutes original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Help with what constitutes original research
|
| Got a question |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Got a question
|
| Can I use Time as a secondary source? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Can I use Time as a secondary source?
|
| Use by cranks |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Use by cranks
|
| Question on synthesis of Maps |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Question on synthesis of Maps
|
| Edits in April |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Edits in April
|
| Example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Example
|
| Definitions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Definitions
|
| Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Question
|
| Question 2 |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Question 2
|
| Simple question. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Simple question.
|
| Discussion about NPOV, NOR, Verifiability etc. on Talk:Fedora Core |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Discussion about NPOV, NOR, Verifiability etc. on Talk:Fedora Core
|
| Question 3 |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 6#Question 3
|
| Primary information as "research" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Primary information as "research"
|
| Altered photos |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Altered photos
|
| Evidence.... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Evidence....
|
| This policy must be destroyed |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#This policy must be destroyed
|
| This policy allows WP to be highjacked by sensationalist publishing |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#This policy allows WP to be highjacked by sensationalist publishing
|
| Appear to advance a position |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Appear to advance a position
|
| Distinction between original research and unverifiable material |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Distinction between original research and unverifiable material
|
| Unclear section |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Unclear section
|
| This policy is non-negotiable |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#This policy is non-negotiable
|
| Consensus |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Consensus
|
| Reasonable inference |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Reasonable inference
|
| Use of census data |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Use of census data
|
| (DIYD)2. Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#(DIYD)2. Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't
|
| Mathematics |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Mathematics
|
| Example link broken |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Example link broken
|
| Translations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#Translations
|
| "Common sense" on Wikipedia |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 7#"Common sense" on Wikipedia
|
| Is linking to a forum post enough non-original reseachness for a nickname? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Is linking to a forum post enough non-original reseachness for a nickname?
|
| Selective citation to advance a position |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Selective citation to advance a position
|
| Yet Another Unenforceable Policy (YAUP) |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Yet Another Unenforceable Policy (YAUP)
|
| Reasonable Inference again |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Reasonable Inference again
|
| Meaning of "Novel" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Meaning of "Novel"
|
| Common Knowledge |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Common Knowledge
|
| Ethnicity inclusions |
99 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Ethnicity inclusions
|
| Research, Rephrasing and Reasoning |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Research, Rephrasing and Reasoning
|
| Discussing interpretation of poems, novels, and the like |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Discussing interpretation of poems, novels, and the like
|
| Plagiarism example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Plagiarism example
|
| There should be EXCEPTIONS to this policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#There should be EXCEPTIONS to this policy
|
| proposed wording change |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#proposed wording change
|
| Crime Rate Example |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Crime Rate Example
|
| truth |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#truth
|
| Wikipedia articles include material on the basis of verifiability, not truth. |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Wikipedia articles include material on the basis of verifiability, not truth.
|
| violating V implies violating NOR? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#violating V implies violating NOR?
|
| Terryeo does not answer proof challenge |
53 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Terryeo does not answer proof challenge
|
| Please let us know if this is OR... |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Please let us know if this is OR...
|
| Precedents for AfDs regarding "no new analysis or synthesis" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Precedents for AfDs regarding "no new analysis or synthesis"
|
| Could someone define "self-published"? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Could someone define "self-published"?
|
| Solecism/Tautology |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Solecism/Tautology
|
| To the general public |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#To the general public
|
| Published = Made Public |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Published = Made Public
|
| Opening policy nutshell |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Opening policy nutshell
|
| A better way to look at accessibility |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#A better way to look at accessibility
|
| Common knowledge, but no source |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Common knowledge, but no source
|
| syllogism |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#syllogism
|
| SF Giants programs |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#SF Giants programs
|
| Signed Posts |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Signed Posts
|
| Proposed definition of Publish |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Proposed definition of Publish
|
| What if it's published in a journal first? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#What if it's published in a journal first?
|
| Need some opinion here |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Need some opinion here
|
| Statement of Gerry Ashton's proposed definition |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Statement of Gerry Ashton's proposed definition
|
| Why this discussion started |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Why this discussion started
|
| Definition of "published" — Resolved, we don't need another one, an informal poll |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#Definition of "published" — Resolved, we don't need another one, an informal poll
|
| The true meaning of Original Research |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 8#The true meaning of Original Research
|
| Reputable publications -> NPOV |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Reputable publications -> NPOV
|
| More reasons for sourcing |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#More reasons for sourcing
|
| Trolling |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Trolling
|
| Proposal: State that "no original research" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Proposal: State that "no original research" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia
|
| Non negotiable |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Non negotiable
|
| Citation indexes |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Citation indexes
|
| Editors citing themselves |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Editors citing themselves
|
| Editors citing themselves rule change |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Editors citing themselves rule change
|
| That Was No Revert |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#That Was No Revert
|
| The Line? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#The Line?
|
| Failure to Communicate |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 9#Failure to Communicate
|
| Requesting Unprotection of the NOR Page |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#Requesting Unprotection of the NOR Page
|
| Expert editors |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10#Expert editors
|
| All primary v. secondary sources discussion moved |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#All primary v. secondary sources discussion moved
|
| Do we still have any conflicts over this one section? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10#Do we still have any conflicts over this one section?
|
| On the Integrity of WP:Policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#On the Integrity of WP:Policy
|
| Historical Datapoints for WP:NOR |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#Historical Datapoints for WP:NOR
|
| Question |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#Question
|
| Proposed alternative wording for Citing oneself section |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 10#Proposed alternative wording for Citing oneself section
|
| Legal implications |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#Legal implications
|
| On WikiPseudoConsensus |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#On WikiPseudoConsensus
|
| Suggestions for Getting Back on Track |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#Suggestions for Getting Back on Track
|
| OK, how about this? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 11#OK, how about this?
|
| Son Of Suggestion |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#Son Of Suggestion
|
| Christian Cross Asterism (astronomy) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#Christian Cross Asterism (astronomy)
|
| A related essay |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#A related essay
|
| Practical and Structural Problems with the Present Directives on Self-Citation |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#Practical and Structural Problems with the Present Directives on Self-Citation
|
| Changed "Expert Editors" back to original |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#Changed "Expert Editors" back to original
|
| Pool Forge Covered Bridge and OR |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Pool Forge Covered Bridge and OR
|
| RfC for Hyles Anderson College |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#RfC for Hyles Anderson College
|
| If you have a longtanding version that lasts longer than four years, please see a doctor |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 12#If you have a longtanding version that lasts longer than four years, please see a doctor
|
| Original Research question - artist-submitted information |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Original Research question - artist-submitted information
|
| Do not agree with this site |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Do not agree with this site
|
| Question for Pproctor |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Question for Pproctor
|
| protected? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#protected?
|
| Dave Carter copied from blp talk |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Dave Carter copied from blp talk
|
| Wikipedia:concensus |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Wikipedia:concensus
|
| Safe to unprotect? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Safe to unprotect?
|
| Is it original research to translate an anonymous webboard posting? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Is it original research to translate an anonymous webboard posting?
|
| Secondary vs. tertiary sources and signing |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Secondary vs. tertiary sources and signing
|
| Opinions please: should this change have been reverted? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Opinions please: should this change have been reverted?
|
| Is it original research if..... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Is it original research if.....
|
| a test case for where NOR intersects with Vanity Guidelines |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#a test case for where NOR intersects with Vanity Guidelines
|
| Avoiding Nursery Jargon, Welcoming External Criticism |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Avoiding Nursery Jargon, Welcoming External Criticism
|
| Avoiding primary/secondary thing |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 13#Avoiding primary/secondary thing
|
| Specialist knowledge |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Specialist knowledge
|
| my revert |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#my revert
|
| secondary sources preferred? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#secondary sources preferred?
|
| Original research |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Original research
|
| Consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Consensus
|
| Suggested change to opening paragraph |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Suggested change to opening paragraph
|
| Several changes per day - please stop! |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Several changes per day - please stop!
|
| User:Tyresias |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#User:Tyresias
|
| Lost clarification against editing policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Lost clarification against editing policy
|
| Please don't start discussions on other pages without repeated mention on this page! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Please don't start discussions on other pages without repeated mention on this page!
|
| Only published primary sources? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Only published primary sources?
|
| Feedback Please |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Feedback Please
|
| No original reverts? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#No original reverts?
|
| Wikiversity |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Wikiversity
|
| Carrying NPOV foreward into NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Carrying NPOV foreward into NOR
|
| Math |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Math
|
| OR in articles vs OR in talk pages |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#OR in articles vs OR in talk pages
|
| Nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 14#Nutshell
|
| Nutshell text spilling onto Wikipedia policies box? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Nutshell text spilling onto Wikipedia policies box?
|
| Is it original research if... (redux) |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Is it original research if... (redux)
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Wikipedia:Attribution
|
| Problem on an article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Problem on an article
|
| sources question |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#sources question
|
| Chess engine analysis |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Chess engine analysis
|
| broken link |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#broken link
|
| Ghost ramp |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Ghost ramp
|
| Are most Wikipedia "Lists of" original research? (fork from “Ghost ramp”) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Are most Wikipedia "Lists of" original research? (fork from “Ghost ramp”)
|
| Burden of showing consensus |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Burden of showing consensus
|
| Policy changes by SlimVirgin |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Policy changes by SlimVirgin
|
| Is juxtaposition of A and B equivalent to OR ? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Is juxtaposition of A and B equivalent to OR ?
|
| Serve/serves |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Serve/serves
|
| Review of Policy |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Review of Policy
|
| Policy dispute regarding primary sources and OR (requested comment) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Policy dispute regarding primary sources and OR (requested comment)
|
| C'mon! O.R. is EVERYWHERE! |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#C'mon! O.R. is EVERYWHERE!
|
| Question about Census data and crime stats |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Question about Census data and crime stats
|
| Translation(s) |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Translation(s)
|
| Info on translation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Info on translation
|
| Working through the backlog |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Working through the backlog
|
| Question Regarding Self Publishing |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Question Regarding Self Publishing
|
| Translating the Policy page |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Translating the Policy page
|
| Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position
|
| OR vs. deficit of research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#OR vs. deficit of research
|
| Newspaper accounts |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Newspaper accounts
|
| This policy should be deleted |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#This policy should be deleted
|
| Image:Vineland 55-60.jpg |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Image:Vineland 55-60.jpg
|
| Newspapers |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Newspapers
|
| Newspapers |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Newspapers
|
| Reliance on primary sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Reliance on primary sources
|
| YouTube art as primary source |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#YouTube art as primary source
|
| Proposed amendment |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Proposed amendment
|
| Synopsyes of novels |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Synopsyes of novels
|
| Need input on page in this matter |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Need input on page in this matter
|
| Change needed? Also, a question |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Change needed? Also, a question
|
| A person as a secondary source |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#A person as a secondary source
|
| A request for advice |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#A request for advice
|
| A case study (and improving Wikipedia to make a point) |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#A case study (and improving Wikipedia to make a point)
|
| Removing original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Removing original research
|
| First sentence |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#First sentence
|
| Audio recording |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 15#Audio recording
|
| Removal of referenced material |
61 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Removal of referenced material
|
| Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Question
|
| A Criticism of WP:NOR |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#A Criticism of WP:NOR
|
| Policy on Original Research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Policy on Original Research
|
| Removed Paragraph |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Removed Paragraph
|
| Altered paragraph |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Altered paragraph
|
| Restoring "source-based research" and "apple pie" paragraphs |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Restoring "source-based research" and "apple pie" paragraphs
|
| "Synthesis of published material" questions |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#"Synthesis of published material" questions
|
| Some advice please |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Some advice please
|
| Possible guidelines about when synthesis is and isn't OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Possible guidelines about when synthesis is and isn't OR?
|
| Hypothetical Situation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Hypothetical Situation
|
| Talk Pages |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Talk Pages
|
| Who is our model verifier? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Who is our model verifier?
|
| Equations: Original research and verifiability |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Equations: Original research and verifiability
|
| Primary vs. Secondary sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Primary vs. Secondary sources
|
| NOR limiting the usefulness of WP |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#NOR limiting the usefulness of WP
|
| What is reliable? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#What is reliable?
|
| Other avenues |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Other avenues
|
| Scriptures |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Scriptures
|
| Possible clarification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Possible clarification
|
| Original Research vs. Collection of information |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Original Research vs. Collection of information
|
| What is a Reputable Publisher? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#What is a Reputable Publisher?
|
| Foundation issues??? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Foundation issues???
|
| Is Quoting from Wayback (web.archive.org) Considered OR? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Is Quoting from Wayback (web.archive.org) Considered OR?
|
| Synthesis |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Synthesis
|
| Synthesis proposal: without the red herring |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Synthesis proposal: without the red herring
|
| Interpreting text on an image: OR or not? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Interpreting text on an image: OR or not?
|
| This rule cannot work, does not work and will never work. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#This rule cannot work, does not work and will never work.
|
| WP:SYNT at Persian Gulf naming dispute ? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#WP:SYNT at Persian Gulf naming dispute ?
|
| SYNT. Yes, it's me again. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#SYNT. Yes, it's me again.
|
| Citing Jimmy Wales |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Citing Jimmy Wales
|
| Translation into Dutch |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Translation into Dutch
|
| Attention needed of SYNT experts! |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Attention needed of SYNT experts!
|
| Nutshell |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Nutshell
|
| There is no real substantive difference between stating and advancing a position |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#There is no real substantive difference between stating and advancing a position
|
| Picking patterns out of a timetable: OR? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Picking patterns out of a timetable: OR?
|
| Question |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Question 2
|
| The IAL population hydra |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#The IAL population hydra
|
| 2nd Person |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#2nd Person
|
| Reversed audio clips |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Reversed audio clips
|
| Do not confuse the success of Wikipedia with the success of this policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Do not confuse the success of Wikipedia with the success of this policy
|
| Nutshell |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Nutshell 2
|
| Synthesis of published material -- request for clarification |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Synthesis of published material -- request for clarification
|
| Helllllllppppppp |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Helllllllppppppp
|
| Where to put it |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Where to put it
|
| Additional opinions wanted - Angie's List |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Additional opinions wanted - Angie's List
|
| Photo manipulation |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Photo manipulation
|
| Question about an audio sample |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Question about an audio sample
|
| Synthesis yet again |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Synthesis yet again
|
| Reliable Source |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Reliable Source
|
| Controversy over criticism of Quebec society |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Controversy over criticism of Quebec society
|
| Can we say that two conflicting sources conflict? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Can we say that two conflicting sources conflict?
|
| Can we use O.R. to argue for or against a source? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Can we use O.R. to argue for or against a source?
|
| Proposed addition: "Original research is allowed on Talk pages" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Proposed addition: "Original research is allowed on Talk pages"
|
| Does adding statistics count as synthesizing data? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Does adding statistics count as synthesizing data?
|
| a case in point: synthesis |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#a case in point: synthesis
|
| Statistically proveable original research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Statistically proveable original research
|
| Can a distributor's product manual be used as a source? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Can a distributor's product manual be used as a source?
|
| Prohibiting Original Thinking Precludes Quality Work |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Prohibiting Original Thinking Precludes Quality Work
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution: Merger of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Wikipedia:Attribution: Merger of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research
|
| Request for comments on Original research in Historical revisionism article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Request for comments on Original research in Historical revisionism article
|
| Conflict between Policies |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Conflict between Policies
|
| Now historical |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Now historical
|
| Inappropriate editing |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 16#Inappropriate editing
|
| removing {{historical}} from talk page |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#removing {{historical}} from talk page
|
| Protect |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Protect
|
| WP:ATT: Join the discussion at |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#WP:ATT: Join the discussion at
|
| An inquiry on the synthesis policy |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#An inquiry on the synthesis policy
|
| NOTE: There is a proposal to merge this page into WP:ATT. |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#NOTE: There is a proposal to merge this page into WP:ATT.
|
| New combined merge/prot/community discussion header tag |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#New combined merge/prot/community discussion header tag
|
| Page rename? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Page rename?
|
| Jimbo Wales's requested poll nearly done - please see |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Jimbo Wales's requested poll nearly done - please see
|
| Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll
|
| Refrencing a T.V |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Refrencing a T.V
|
| Making your own sources/citations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Making your own sources/citations
|
| ? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#?
|
| importance-s template |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#importance-s template
|
| Novelty in Synthesis |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Novelty in Synthesis
|
| Synthesis example |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Synthesis example
|
| Suggested clarification: No original research rule applies to the article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Suggested clarification: No original research rule applies to the article
|
| WP:OR and images of non-existant things |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#WP:OR and images of non-existant things
|
| Is using a definition original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Is using a definition original research?
|
| is this original research? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#is this original research?
|
| Most scientists |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Most scientists
|
| Semi-hypothetical query |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Semi-hypothetical query
|
| Tertiary sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Tertiary sources
|
| Citing Oneself |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Citing Oneself
|
| Article with a LOT of Synthesis |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Article with a LOT of Synthesis
|
| Original images - Need an admin to assist |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Original images - Need an admin to assist
|
| Dispute regarding publication of original research in article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Dispute regarding publication of original research in article
|
| Creation-evolution controversy article (clarification and guidance sought) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Creation-evolution controversy article (clarification and guidance sought)
|
| If PSTS was moved, is this policy weakened? |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#If PSTS was moved, is this policy weakened?
|
| Remove two words? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 17#Remove two words?
|
| These policies aint worth a crap without critique |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#These policies aint worth a crap without critique
|
| Where can we put original research? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Where can we put original research?
|
| Perhaps a "STFU, this isn't the article itself" tag? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Perhaps a "STFU, this isn't the article itself" tag?
|
| Proposed Addition to the Policy |
88 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Proposed Addition to the Policy
|
| NOR is a red herring |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#NOR is a red herring
|
| Why you can't change it (crossposted) |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Why you can't change it (crossposted)
|
| Original images and 'artist's impressions' |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Original images and 'artist's impressions'
|
| Another word change |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Another word change
|
| Wiki |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Wiki
|
| Permissible synthesis |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Permissible synthesis
|
| Is adding perspective WP:OR? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Is adding perspective WP:OR?
|
| "Novel Narrative"? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#"Novel Narrative"?
|
| Wikipedia:It's ok to use your brain |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Wikipedia:It's ok to use your brain
|
| Shane Ruttle Martinez |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Shane Ruttle Martinez
|
| Use My Brain |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Use My Brain
|
| Exception for maths |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Exception for maths
|
| Sure |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Sure
|
| Primary sources vs. secondary sources |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Primary sources vs. secondary sources
|
| Direct quote |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Direct quote
|
| Reliable Publication or Source |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Reliable Publication or Source
|
| Clarification of policy |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Clarification of policy
|
| Clarification of policy |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Clarification of policy 2
|
| "the most reliable sources" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#"the most reliable sources"
|
| HDI calculation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#HDI calculation
|
| Synthesis |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Synthesis
|
| Verifiability (V) - clarification needed |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Verifiability (V) - clarification needed
|
| OR Claim: 3 legs'o' WP derivable from usability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#OR Claim: 3 legs'o' WP derivable from usability
|
| OR interpretation dispute |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#OR interpretation dispute
|
| How to fix the problem? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#How to fix the problem?
|
| What is being done to improve the policy of Wikipedia? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#What is being done to improve the policy of Wikipedia?
|
| a question about original research: |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#a question about original research:
|
| Chicago manual of style |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Chicago manual of style
|
| Systematic removal in spite of extraordinary obviousness |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Systematic removal in spite of extraordinary obviousness
|
| You cannot describe and summarize conflicting POV's, without violating WP:SYN |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#You cannot describe and summarize conflicting POV's, without violating WP:SYN
|
| Stating the obvious is not original research and there needs to be a grace period for hard-to-find references. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Stating the obvious is not original research and there needs to be a grace period for hard-to-find references.
|
| The disinformation caused by the OR policy |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#The disinformation caused by the OR policy
|
| Osteopathic medicine |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Osteopathic medicine
|
| Buy Why?? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Buy Why??
|
| My Problem with WP:OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#My Problem with WP:OR
|
| Proposed alternative example of synthesis |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Proposed alternative example of synthesis
|
| Two minor points |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Two minor points
|
| Original images |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Original images
|
| Objections to copy-edit |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Objections to copy-edit
|
| Reversion of copy-edit |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Reversion of copy-edit
|
| Excluded or included? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Excluded or included?
|
| "I do not think that means what you think it means." |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#"I do not think that means what you think it means."
|
| Working towards a consensus wording |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Working towards a consensus wording
|
| Primary and secondary sources |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Primary and secondary sources
|
| Inverviewing people |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Inverviewing people
|
| Unprotected |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Unprotected
|
| Open Source Software vs. Wikipedia |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 18#Open Source Software vs. Wikipedia
|
| "Tiny minority" view |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#"Tiny minority" view
|
| Posters |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Posters
|
| Proposal: more slack for this guideline |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Proposal: more slack for this guideline
|
| Detailed example of synthesis |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Detailed example of synthesis
|
| conclusion / Proposal: more slack for this guideline |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#conclusion / Proposal: more slack for this guideline
|
| What is wrong with OR? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#What is wrong with OR?
|
| assertions, theories, opinions, and arguments |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#assertions, theories, opinions, and arguments
|
| Primary sources |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Primary sources
|
| "Unsigned articles may be less reliable" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#"Unsigned articles may be less reliable"
|
| WP:NOR and free images |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#WP:NOR and free images
|
| original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#original research
|
| OR/Synthesis dispute |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#OR/Synthesis dispute
|
| Is this OR? Translation of ancient manuscript |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Is this OR? Translation of ancient manuscript
|
| Wikipedia:Requests for verification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Wikipedia:Requests for verification
|
| Could someone with a good grasp of NOR, and a good deal of patience and time on their hand please provide a second opinion |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Could someone with a good grasp of NOR, and a good deal of patience and time on their hand please provide a second opinion
|
| Just to circle around Synthesis section again |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Just to circle around Synthesis section again
|
| TV shows |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#TV shows
|
| Preference for primary sources for quotations? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Preference for primary sources for quotations?
|
| Hypothetical question |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Hypothetical question
|
| Data-crunching OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Data-crunching OR?
|
| NOR and articles on TV and cartoon characters |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#NOR and articles on TV and cartoon characters
|
| {{cite I looked at the bloody file}} |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#{{cite I looked at the bloody file}}
|
| Still on OR policy |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Still on OR policy
|
| Misuse of Wikipedia Policies |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Misuse of Wikipedia Policies
|
| Removal of No Original Research policy |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Removal of No Original Research policy
|
| Revised primary, secondary, and tertiary section |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Revised primary, secondary, and tertiary section
|
| Here in Italy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Here in Italy
|
| Meaning of Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Meaning of Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources
|
| Kinds of claims first, kinds of sources second? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Kinds of claims first, kinds of sources second?
|
| Wikipedia is a secondary source on many articles; change the policy, delete the articles, or ignore? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Wikipedia is a secondary source on many articles; change the policy, delete the articles, or ignore?
|
| Quality vs type |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Quality vs type
|
| Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position
|
| Jelly bean, interpretation of SYNT, and request for opinions. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Jelly bean, interpretation of SYNT, and request for opinions.
|
| Straw poll: Should No original research take a stand against primary sources and tertiary sources? |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Straw poll: Should No original research take a stand against primary sources and tertiary sources?
|
| Discussion about sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#Discussion about sources
|
| On sources, and the classification thereof |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#On sources, and the classification thereof
|
| On the appropriate uses of primary sources |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#On the appropriate uses of primary sources
|
| Assumption of bad faith in original research |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Assumption of bad faith in original research
|
| BBC Example |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 19#BBC Example
|
| Village pump |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Village pump
|
| Protection of wrong version |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Protection of wrong version
|
| Scope of OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Scope of OR
|
| Houston, we have a trouble |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Houston, we have a trouble
|
| This whole issue over the "articles should rely on secondary sources" does raise a good point though... |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#This whole issue over the "articles should rely on secondary sources" does raise a good point though...
|
| Time chain |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Time chain
|
| Is listing a subset from a published government document original research? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Is listing a subset from a published government document original research?
|
| What about information where sources cannot be found at all? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#What about information where sources cannot be found at all?
|
| Okay, another question posed |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Okay, another question posed
|
| Is the article Jennings Rutter Battle original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Is the article Jennings Rutter Battle original research?
|
| COGDEN's edit (Two-part test as applied to secondary sources) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#COGDEN's edit (Two-part test as applied to secondary sources)
|
| Based on use |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Based on use
|
| Primary v. secondary sources in the scientific literature |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Primary v. secondary sources in the scientific literature
|
| Facts and Interpretations |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Facts and Interpretations
|
| Proposed new section on Primary and secondary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Proposed new section on Primary and secondary sources
|
| Are we sure we want a special rule for scientific articles? |
57 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Are we sure we want a special rule for scientific articles?
|
| "Appears that" |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#"Appears that"
|
| A different explanation in hopes of clarity |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#A different explanation in hopes of clarity
|
| Sources proposal |
63 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Sources proposal
|
| WP:NOR is stupid |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#WP:NOR is stupid
|
| End-runs around WP:NPOV? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#End-runs around WP:NPOV?
|
| Lists of People? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Lists of People?
|
| That wasn't reorganization, that was a major rewrite |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#That wasn't reorganization, that was a major rewrite
|
| Word Etymologies |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Word Etymologies
|
| Straw poll to test for consensus to remove edit protection |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Straw poll to test for consensus to remove edit protection
|
| Can we describe good Wikipedia research practice on another page? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Can we describe good Wikipedia research practice on another page?
|
| Is this OR? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Is this OR?
|
| Re: WP:BLP#Reliable sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Re: WP:BLP#Reliable sources
|
| Unreliable citation from reliable sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Unreliable citation from reliable sources
|
| What means ”not truth” in Wikipedia policy statement? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#What means ”not truth” in Wikipedia policy statement?
|
| Advice |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Advice
|
| Proposal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Proposal
|
| Issues at hand |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Issues at hand
|
| I don't want to write any more until someone breaks up the last section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#I don't want to write any more until someone breaks up the last section
|
| Issues at hand, part 2: The Revenge (Arbitrary Break) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Issues at hand, part 2: The Revenge (Arbitrary Break)
|
| Before we unprotect the page |
81 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Before we unprotect the page
|
| Unprotected? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Unprotected?
|
| Compromise on archiving |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Compromise on archiving
|
| How I see the source issues |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#How I see the source issues
|
| Regroup |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Regroup
|
| Notice of draft revision |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Notice of draft revision
|
| Over a year |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Over a year
|
| Are journal articles primary and secondary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Are journal articles primary and secondary sources?
|
| Why has this become so complicated? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Why has this become so complicated?
|
| Are examples original research? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Are examples original research?
|
| Is merging data tables from diverse sources OR? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Is merging data tables from diverse sources OR?
|
| Dictionary |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Dictionary
|
| Proposal for removing the coats from the coatrack |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Proposal for removing the coats from the coatrack
|
| Are immediately verifiable statements OR? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Are immediately verifiable statements OR?
|
| a proposal - just the intro |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#a proposal - just the intro
|
| Synt check requested |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Synt check requested
|
| Recent POV-pushing |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Recent POV-pushing
|
| protection |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#protection
|
| Back to the question of what policy should be |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Back to the question of what policy should be
|
| Quick check |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Quick check
|
| Why not just recommend source-checking? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Why not just recommend source-checking?
|
| Looking Better |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Looking Better
|
| peer reviewed academic articles are primary sources ? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#peer reviewed academic articles are primary sources ?
|
| Math calculations |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Math calculations
|
| Refocusing on the source discussion |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Refocusing on the source discussion
|
| Ahead, not after |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Ahead, not after
|
| Rant on special definitions |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Rant on special definitions
|
| Another proposal |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Another proposal
|
| Proposal for second section |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Proposal for second section
|
| Why we DO need some sort of a statement on primary sources usage |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Why we DO need some sort of a statement on primary sources usage
|
| Defining terms by interpreting quotations |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Defining terms by interpreting quotations
|
| Is this original research? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Is this original research?
|
| What do we agree on? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#What do we agree on?
|
| What does "novel" mean? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#What does "novel" mean?
|
| An illustration of the proper vs improper use of a primary source... |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#An illustration of the proper vs improper use of a primary source...
|
| What if we just swaped words? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#What if we just swaped words?
|
| The famous(?) "OMG WTF, this isn't what I learned" argument |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#The famous(?) "OMG WTF, this isn't what I learned" argument
|
| OK, how about these questions? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#OK, how about these questions?
|
| Math - where is the line between paraphrasing and synthesizing/interpreting? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Math - where is the line between paraphrasing and synthesizing/interpreting?
|
| statements concluding: "No conclusion can be made" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#statements concluding: "No conclusion can be made"
|
| Moving the discussion forward |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Moving the discussion forward
|
| PSTS proposals |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#PSTS proposals
|
| Back to basics |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#Back to basics
|
| Proposal |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Proposal
|
| Template |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Template
|
| Squaring the circle |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Squaring the circle
|
| An alternative proposal |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#An alternative proposal
|
| Comments on the alternative proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Comments on the alternative proposal
|
| Use of an example to test |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Use of an example to test
|
| protection |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#protection
|
| A point of interest |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#A point of interest
|
| How to promote instruction creep |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#How to promote instruction creep
|
| Primary and secondary |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Primary and secondary
|
| A Different Approach |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#A Different Approach
|
| Blueboar's re-draft of Speny's approach |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Blueboar's re-draft of Speny's approach
|
| Cutting to the chase |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Cutting to the chase
|
| Perhaps something like this |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Perhaps something like this
|
| New draft, incorporating comments |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#New draft, incorporating comments
|
| Comments on 9/20 (15:48) draft of proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Comments on 9/20 (15:48) draft of proposal
|
| Comments on 9/20 draft (minor update) proposal |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 21#Comments on 9/20 draft (minor update) proposal
|
| Draft as of 9/20/07 (15:48) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 20#Draft as of 9/20/07 (15:48)
|
| 135,000 |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#135,000
|
| Material close to the subject.. |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Material close to the subject..
|
| Summary of concerns on source typing |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Summary of concerns on source typing
|
| Proposed language as of 9/21/07 |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Proposed language as of 9/21/07
|
| Tertiary sources |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Tertiary sources
|
| Attempt to address the new opposition |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Attempt to address the new opposition
|
| Attention newcomers to this article |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Attention newcomers to this article
|
| should we make a proposed change essay page? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#should we make a proposed change essay page?
|
| Proposed addendum |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Proposed addendum
|
| Errors in "reliable sources" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Errors in "reliable sources"
|
| Proposed wording as of 2007-Sept-22 |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 22#Proposed wording as of 2007-Sept-22
|
| If we remove PSTS from this article, where will (should) they go? |
59 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#If we remove PSTS from this article, where will (should) they go?
|
| Does the Pope have white hair? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Does the Pope have white hair?
|
| WP:PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 23#WP:PSTS
|
| PSTS anomalies |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#PSTS anomalies
|
| Example without PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Example without PSTS
|
| Step-by-step |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Step-by-step
|
| Motivations |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Motivations
|
| Synthesis? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Synthesis?
|
| "Entropy" in WP:PSTS over the past few months |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#"Entropy" in WP:PSTS over the past few months
|
| Getting back to the other debate... |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Getting back to the other debate...
|
| Suggestion for refocussing of PSTS |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Suggestion for refocussing of PSTS
|
| Transclusion example |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Transclusion example
|
| PSTS and source typing |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#PSTS and source typing
|
| Just to be clear: definition of primary and secondary sources |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Just to be clear: definition of primary and secondary sources
|
| Warnings added to policy page |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Warnings added to policy page
|
| Consensus determination ideas |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Consensus determination ideas
|
| Clear and simple |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 24#Clear and simple
|
| Clear and simple (2) |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Clear and simple (2)
|
| Whatever happened to Blueboar's proposal? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Whatever happened to Blueboar's proposal?
|
| Goals |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Goals
|
| NOR is useful. The word "primary" is not. |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#NOR is useful. The word "primary" is not.
|
| Derogatory statements, and personal insults |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Derogatory statements, and personal insults
|
| What are people afraid of? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#What are people afraid of?
|
| Where can we put stuff so it won't be lost? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Where can we put stuff so it won't be lost?
|
| Published Original Research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Published Original Research
|
| PSTS and conflicting definitions |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#PSTS and conflicting definitions
|
| minor proposals |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#minor proposals
|
| Can Original research be defined without defining the types of sources? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Can Original research be defined without defining the types of sources?
|
| The problem with PSTS—Insufficient granularity |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#The problem with PSTS—Insufficient granularity
|
| Focus and awareness |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Focus and awareness
|
| Yet another proposal (yes, again) |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 25#Yet another proposal (yes, again)
|
| A slight rewording of the proposal |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#A slight rewording of the proposal
|
| An important distinction |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#An important distinction
|
| The evolution article |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#The evolution article
|
| Question about WP:SYN |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Question about WP:SYN
|
| Proposal : Recognized expertise trumps other claims |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Proposal : Recognized expertise trumps other claims
|
| NOR, discussion pages, and 'Explanation' |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#NOR, discussion pages, and 'Explanation'
|
| Issues with this policy |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Issues with this policy
|
| Hopefully, Final version of this proposed addition |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Hopefully, Final version of this proposed addition
|
| A separate problem with the synthesis section |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#A separate problem with the synthesis section
|
| Identifying the ground floor |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Identifying the ground floor
|
| Please include link to Swedish Wikipedia |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Please include link to Swedish Wikipedia
|
| No consensus even among the proponents |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#No consensus even among the proponents
|
| Archiving |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Archiving
|
| Request edit |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Request edit
|
| Direct quotes and special definitions |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Direct quotes and special definitions
|
| SYN |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#SYN
|
| Jewish Bolshevism |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Jewish Bolshevism
|
| Primary vs. secondary: facts vs. analysis |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Primary vs. secondary: facts vs. analysis
|
| Anonymous insertion at WP:RS |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Anonymous insertion at WP:RS
|
| Can somebody weigh on a case of possible OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Can somebody weigh on a case of possible OR
|
| Alternative proposals: straw poll. |
62 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Alternative proposals: straw poll.
|
| Use of (sic) and [] in a quote |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Use of (sic) and [] in a quote
|
| Just wondering |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Just wondering
|
| Link to Original Research page |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Link to Original Research page
|
| Option 2b |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Option 2b
|
| Conversion and WP:SYNTH. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Conversion and WP:SYNTH.
|
| Section Titles are Original Research? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Section Titles are Original Research?
|
| Discussion about particular attribution |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Discussion about particular attribution
|
| What's the largest source-related statement for which there is a consensus? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#What's the largest source-related statement for which there is a consensus?
|
| Primary/secondary distinction |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Primary/secondary distinction
|
| Where's the consensus? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Where's the consensus?
|
| Another debate over the use of PS |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Another debate over the use of PS
|
| When can we unprotect? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#When can we unprotect?
|
| Would the Arbitration Committee hear this? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Would the Arbitration Committee hear this?
|
| OR and translation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#OR and translation
|
| Page unprotected |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Page unprotected
|
| Press as a reliable source wording needs fixing |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 26#Press as a reliable source wording needs fixing
|
| Wikipedia:No original research#Reliable sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Wikipedia:No original research#Reliable sources
|
| New edits... So far so good |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#New edits... So far so good
|
| Intro caveat in WP:PSTS |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Intro caveat in WP:PSTS
|
| Taking the dive (PSTS proposal) |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Taking the dive (PSTS proposal)
|
| Another topic for discussion |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Another topic for discussion
|
| Primary, secondary, and tertiary |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Primary, secondary, and tertiary
|
| Sources - Disputed section? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Sources - Disputed section?
|
| Personal testimony |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Personal testimony
|
| Press again |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Press again
|
| Persecution |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Persecution
|
| Catholicism and Freemasonry |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Catholicism and Freemasonry
|
| RfC: Proposal for WP:PSTS |
95 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#RfC: Proposal for WP:PSTS
|
| Request for Comment - The Matrix Online |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Request for Comment - The Matrix Online
|
| I Challenge the Following |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#I Challenge the Following
|
| Catholicism and Freemasonry again |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Catholicism and Freemasonry again
|
| Origins of this policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Origins of this policy
|
| Programming Code |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Programming Code
|
| Do interpretive primary reliable sources need to be verified by a second interpretive reliable source? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Do interpretive primary reliable sources need to be verified by a second interpretive reliable source?
|
| Clarification of "Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Clarification of "Synthesis of published material serving to advance a position"
|
| Primary source distinction |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#Primary source distinction
|
| The interminable ramble |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 27#The interminable ramble
|
| articles signed by experts |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#articles signed by experts
|
| Suggested tweak |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Suggested tweak
|
| Straw poll about interpretive primary sources. |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Straw poll about interpretive primary sources.
|
| WP:SYNTH violation |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#WP:SYNTH violation
|
| Possible way toward consensus: strengthening the neglected S and T elements of PSTS. |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Possible way toward consensus: strengthening the neglected S and T elements of PSTS.
|
| Is anyone else frustrated by endless rumbles over the main page? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Is anyone else frustrated by endless rumbles over the main page?
|
| Let's find Waldo |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Let's find Waldo
|
| PSTS relative to subject |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#PSTS relative to subject
|
| Another proposal: moving PSTS to WP:V? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Another proposal: moving PSTS to WP:V?
|
| What's going on here? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#What's going on here?
|
| Scientific articles |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Scientific articles
|
| What is a "primary source"? |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#What is a "primary source"?
|
| Cogden's revert |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Cogden's revert
|
| Straw poll to narrow dispute more |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Straw poll to narrow dispute more
|
| Does the "Original" in "No original research" mean anything anymore? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Does the "Original" in "No original research" mean anything anymore?
|
| How to use primary sources without original research |
75 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#How to use primary sources without original research
|
| Policies regarding translations? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Policies regarding translations?
|
| Descriptive plot summeries and primary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Descriptive plot summeries and primary sources
|
| Question about using a novel as a source for a statement about the author |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#Question about using a novel as a source for a statement about the author
|
| Removal of tag |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Removal of tag
|
| Verifiability, not truth?? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Verifiability, not truth??
|
| Links to primary source, secondary source, and tertiary source |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Links to primary source, secondary source, and tertiary source
|
| Recap of PSTS issues for those just joining |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Recap of PSTS issues for those just joining
|
| How is the current practice harmful? Or is it? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 28#How is the current practice harmful? Or is it?
|
| Let me see if I got this straight... |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Let me see if I got this straight...
|
| Can someone show me a real example of good primary-source material that could not be used under this policy? |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Can someone show me a real example of good primary-source material that could not be used under this policy?
|
| Where's the beef? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Where's the beef?
|
| Case study: Philippe Casado |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Case study: Philippe Casado
|
| Second case study: Jacques Derrida |
56 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Second case study: Jacques Derrida
|
| Relation of PSTS to "... in popular culture" sections |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Relation of PSTS to "... in popular culture" sections
|
| Secondary sources need not be verifiable by non-specialists |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Secondary sources need not be verifiable by non-specialists
|
| Does anybody have concrete instances of what the PSTS distinction accomplishes? |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Does anybody have concrete instances of what the PSTS distinction accomplishes?
|
| law / articles about legal cases |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#law / articles about legal cases
|
| Fiction in Wikipedia |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Fiction in Wikipedia
|
| Discussion about image use and WP:NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Discussion about image use and WP:NOR
|
| COGDEN's tag |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#COGDEN's tag
|
| Frustrating |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 29#Frustrating
|
| Proposal: just change the terms primary-->raw and secondary-->interpretive |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Proposal: just change the terms primary-->raw and secondary-->interpretive
|
| For clarity |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#For clarity
|
| Revisiting a proposal |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Revisiting a proposal
|
| Using sources |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Using sources
|
| This dispute is disputed. |
56 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#This dispute is disputed.
|
| Please |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Please
|
| Request wording change and clarification |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Request wording change and clarification
|
| Need Clarification |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Need Clarification
|
| Recent changes |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Recent changes
|
| Someone else deal with it |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Someone else deal with it
|
| WP:IAR has more reasons to now to be the guiding policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#WP:IAR has more reasons to now to be the guiding policy
|
| Question |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Question
|
| What about documentaries |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#What about documentaries
|
| A question of consensus |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#A question of consensus
|
| WP:POLICY dispute |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#WP:POLICY dispute
|
| Revisiting use of primary sources in controversial articles |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Revisiting use of primary sources in controversial articles
|
| Misrepresentations by all 'sides' concerned |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Misrepresentations by all 'sides' concerned
|
| Is there any room for compromise? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Is there any room for compromise?
|
| Minor clarification to WP:PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Minor clarification to WP:PSTS
|
| FYI, there is a request for arbitration and a request for comment regarding PSTS |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#FYI, there is a request for arbitration and a request for comment regarding PSTS
|
| Draft explanation |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Draft explanation
|
| If we split PSTS into definitions and usage... |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#If we split PSTS into definitions and usage...
|
| Secondary sources |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Secondary sources
|
| Grace period? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Grace period?
|
| Journal articles |
84 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Journal articles
|
| Summary of PSTS issues |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Summary of PSTS issues
|
| Is research ever really defined? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Is research ever really defined?
|
| PST in religion articles |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#PST in religion articles
|
| Secondary sources: bias, fairness, and objectivity |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Secondary sources: bias, fairness, and objectivity
|
| Moved from bot discussion page |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Moved from bot discussion page
|
| Editing comment |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Editing comment
|
| Recent changes to secondary sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Recent changes to secondary sources
|
| A reminder to all |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#A reminder to all
|
| Shifting the PSTS paradigm |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Shifting the PSTS paradigm
|
| Enough |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 30#Enough
|
| Moving PSTS |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Moving PSTS
|
| Move PSTS to reduce churn |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Move PSTS to reduce churn
|
| Primary sources, notability, and this policy |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Primary sources, notability, and this policy
|
| Why are people upset with this policy? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Why are people upset with this policy?
|
| SlimVirgin's recent edit(s) |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#SlimVirgin's recent edit(s)
|
| Would this be acceptable, re: PSTS |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Would this be acceptable, re: PSTS
|
| Another reminder |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Another reminder
|
| A line big enough to drive a truck through.... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#A line big enough to drive a truck through....
|
| Reverts |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Reverts
|
| Primary vs. secondary based on content |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Primary vs. secondary based on content
|
| Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction
|
| "Material serving to advance a position" |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#"Material serving to advance a position"
|
| secondary sources II |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#secondary sources II
|
| Proposal to move forward |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Proposal to move forward
|
| Proposal to shut up |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Proposal to shut up
|
| NotabilitySignificance is central to OR? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#NotabilitySignificance is central to OR?
|
| Towards a compromise: A modest proposal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 31#Towards a compromise: A modest proposal
|
| A minor adjustment |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#A minor adjustment
|
| Discussed and undiscussed edits |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Discussed and undiscussed edits
|
| WP:WITS |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#WP:WITS
|
| Clearly tieing PSTS to NOR |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Clearly tieing PSTS to NOR
|
| Original research being allowed in some form |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Original research being allowed in some form
|
| Query |
98 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Query
|
| Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction “Other options” |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Life beyond PSTS -bloat reduction “Other options”
|
| Signed encyclopedia articles |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Signed encyclopedia articles
|
| Is this original reserach/synthesis? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Is this original reserach/synthesis?
|
| Possible rewording of WP:SYN |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Possible rewording of WP:SYN
|
| Just to be clear... |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Just to be clear...
|
| Addition by Blueboar |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Addition by Blueboar
|
| How to cite sources |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#How to cite sources
|
| How does "no original research" fit with plot summaries? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#How does "no original research" fit with plot summaries?
|
| Wikinews |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Wikinews
|
| Another test case? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Another test case?
|
| New lead to WP:SYN |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#New lead to WP:SYN
|
| Nutshell |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Nutshell
|
| WP:WITS (II) |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#WP:WITS (II)
|
| The two versions |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#The two versions
|
| Use of secondhand |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Use of secondhand
|
| Translation |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Translation
|
| Source typing in controversial articles |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 32#Source typing in controversial articles
|
| Recent edits |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Recent edits
|
| Fullstop's description of a primary source |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Fullstop's description of a primary source
|
| Archive naming |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Archive naming
|
| "consensus changing" tag |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#"consensus changing" tag
|
| Sorry folks... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Sorry folks...
|
| Is PSTS too complex? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Is PSTS too complex?
|
| Refocus |
71 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Refocus
|
| Tags on PSTS |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Tags on PSTS
|
| A new look at OR in general |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#A new look at OR in general
|
| primary over secondary sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#primary over secondary sources
|
| Synthesis vs. synthesis advancing a position |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Synthesis vs. synthesis advancing a position
|
| "The sky is blue" -- do I need a source? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#"The sky is blue" -- do I need a source?
|
| Facts must be backed by citations |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Facts must be backed by citations
|
| Specialist knowledge |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Specialist knowledge
|
| Needed clause: Lincoln's left foot |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Needed clause: Lincoln's left foot
|
| Google Earth |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Google Earth
|
| Is this OR? "A number of people have done this" |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Is this OR? "A number of people have done this"
|
| Nutshell grammar |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Nutshell grammar
|
| Here's a fun example |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Here's a fun example
|
| Infinite verb forms |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Infinite verb forms
|
| Proposal: Make explicit when sourced lists NOT WP:OR |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Proposal: Make explicit when sourced lists NOT WP:OR
|
| I just don't get it... |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#I just don't get it...
|
| Deductions |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Deductions
|
| Interpretation of images |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 33#Interpretation of images
|
| Primary Sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Primary Sources
|
| Scientific Studies As Reliable Secondary Sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Scientific Studies As Reliable Secondary Sources
|
| YouTube |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#YouTube
|
| double standard |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#double standard
|
| Honored in the breach . . . |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Honored in the breach . . .
|
| Where do NOR-interested Wikipedians hang out? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Where do NOR-interested Wikipedians hang out?
|
| Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard
|
| Eliminating Primary Sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Eliminating Primary Sources
|
| Edit summaries |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Edit summaries
|
| Toleration of OR maps |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Toleration of OR maps
|
| Instantiating a mathematical formula |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Instantiating a mathematical formula
|
| Photograph captions |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Photograph captions
|
| Legal implications |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Legal implications
|
| Stating omissions |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Stating omissions
|
| Reference desk |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Reference desk
|
| Clarifying "Primary sources" |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Clarifying "Primary sources"
|
| Assistance and voices |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Assistance and voices
|
| Autobiographies |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Autobiographies
|
| Why did PSTS drop examples of secondary sources? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Why did PSTS drop examples of secondary sources?
|
| Need a neutral opinion on NOR |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Need a neutral opinion on NOR
|
| Clarification or Amendment of WP:SYN |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Clarification or Amendment of WP:SYN
|
| NOR: Content vs Presentation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#NOR: Content vs Presentation
|
| Is NOR Synthesis applicable to math and physics? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Is NOR Synthesis applicable to math and physics?
|
| Fundamental problems with this policy |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Fundamental problems with this policy
|
| Actual proposed change |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Actual proposed change
|
| This SYN issue might have come up before |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#This SYN issue might have come up before
|
| PSTS- autobiographies |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#PSTS- autobiographies
|
| Persecution |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Persecution
|
| The problem with Descriptive claims from Primary research |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#The problem with Descriptive claims from Primary research
|
| Measurements from maps |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Measurements from maps
|
| "Atlas-type" facts |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#"Atlas-type" facts
|
| The problem with "directly related" |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#The problem with "directly related"
|
| The problem with "directly related" |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#The problem with "directly related"
|
| Annotated bibliographies at AfD |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Annotated bibliographies at AfD
|
| Supporting or WP:SYN |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Supporting or WP:SYN
|
| Should WP:ATT be marked as "historical"? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 34#Should WP:ATT be marked as "historical"?
|
| When is a lack of sources poor sourcing, and when is it OR? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#When is a lack of sources poor sourcing, and when is it OR?
|
| Primary and secondary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Primary and secondary sources
|
| Original calculations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Original calculations
|
| Original images |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Original images
|
| What should happen when WP:SYN contradicts WP:NPOV? |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#What should happen when WP:SYN contradicts WP:NPOV?
|
| Synthesis issue at Doctor Fate |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Synthesis issue at Doctor Fate
|
| Where is the line between synthesis and pointing out the obvious? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Where is the line between synthesis and pointing out the obvious?
|
| Is this OR? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Is this OR?
|
| Inuit |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Inuit
|
| Silly Question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Silly Question
|
| original research link? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#original research link?
|
| an informal request for comment |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#an informal request for comment
|
| reword in order to assume good faith |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#reword in order to assume good faith
|
| Action figures |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Action figures
|
| Disputes between different parties |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Disputes between different parties
|
| But OR may be all we have! |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#But OR may be all we have!
|
| Synthesis issue |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Synthesis issue
|
| "Original images" section |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#"Original images" section
|
| Nutshell clause |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Nutshell clause
|
| A whole lotta synthesis goin' on |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#A whole lotta synthesis goin' on
|
| Neutronium: Something odd here |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Neutronium: Something odd here
|
| Move the WP:PSTS section to the WP:V page ? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Move the WP:PSTS section to the WP:V page ?
|
| Dispute regarding PSTS |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Dispute regarding PSTS
|
| Fake images in aviation accident articles |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Fake images in aviation accident articles
|
| Terrorism |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Terrorism
|
| Good article ? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Good article ?
|
| Wikipedia:Attribution |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Wikipedia:Attribution
|
| Various OR questions. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Various OR questions.
|
| What to do about serious editors with legitimate OR. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#What to do about serious editors with legitimate OR.
|
| Expert consensus |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Expert consensus
|
| Discussing Primary/Secondary sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Discussing Primary/Secondary sources
|
| Wiki's OR policy has disturbing side effects |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Wiki's OR policy has disturbing side effects
|
| Are interviews primary or secondary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 35#Are interviews primary or secondary sources?
|
| Using Google Books search links as surveys |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Using Google Books search links as surveys
|
| Are simple observations original research. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Are simple observations original research.
|
| PSTS autobiographies |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#PSTS autobiographies
|
| Original research wanted... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Original research wanted...
|
| Conceptual problem for newbie, concerning acceptable contributions. Related to: Are simple observations original research. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Conceptual problem for newbie, concerning acceptable contributions. Related to: Are simple observations original research.
|
| Wikinfo suggestion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Wikinfo suggestion
|
| We need some exceptions to the policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#We need some exceptions to the policy
|
| Oh, Please, what about Bible stories? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Oh, Please, what about Bible stories?
|
| Application of definitions: synthesis? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Application of definitions: synthesis?
|
| Eschewing original thought is virtue? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Eschewing original thought is virtue?
|
| Tie-in books |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Tie-in books
|
| published court decision |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#published court decision
|
| RfC related to WP:SYNTH |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#RfC related to WP:SYNTH
|
| Primary vs. secondary |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Primary vs. secondary
|
| Chinese cash |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Chinese cash
|
| What is Original Research in the UEFA Cup? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#What is Original Research in the UEFA Cup?
|
| The nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#The nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life
|
| "directly related" edits/reverts |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#"directly related" edits/reverts
|
| Wikiversity |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Wikiversity
|
| The applicability of WP:OR to user-created illustrations of extinct animals... |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#The applicability of WP:OR to user-created illustrations of extinct animals...
|
| Hmmm... is this original research? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Hmmm... is this original research?
|
| Peer Reviewed Publications Should Always Treated As Reliable Secondary Sources |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Peer Reviewed Publications Should Always Treated As Reliable Secondary Sources
|
| Why Peer Review/Secondary Sources Discussed Here |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Why Peer Review/Secondary Sources Discussed Here
|
| Census as a primary source |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Census as a primary source
|
| Patents and research articles |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Patents and research articles
|
| Clarifications needed |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Clarifications needed
|
| PSTS Confusion and Disagreements |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#PSTS Confusion and Disagreements
|
| Sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Sources
|
| Inclusion of certain exceptions |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Inclusion of certain exceptions
|
| Proposed text addition to the policy |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Proposed text addition to the policy
|
| Proposed clarification: Combining indisputable facts is okay |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Proposed clarification: Combining indisputable facts is okay
|
| PSTS Moved. Proposed Policy and Guidelines Draft Input Requested |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#PSTS Moved. Proposed Policy and Guidelines Draft Input Requested
|
| Question about NOR and maps |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Question about NOR and maps
|
| Policy clarification proposal |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Policy clarification proposal
|
| Add WikiInfo Link to Introduction |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 36#Add WikiInfo Link to Introduction
|
| Citing sources simply for what they say. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Citing sources simply for what they say.
|
| stability |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#stability
|
| Proposed addition to WP:SYN |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Proposed addition to WP:SYN
|
| "Directly related" vs. "Refers directly" |
99 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#"Directly related" vs. "Refers directly"
|
| Remove the disputed fragment altogether |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Remove the disputed fragment altogether
|
| Footnote n°2 |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Footnote n°2
|
| Directly Related vs Refer - Lincoln example |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Directly Related vs Refer - Lincoln example
|
| Some questions about synthesis policy |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Some questions about synthesis policy
|
| Jayen466's proposal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Jayen466's proposal
|
| Another example - David Icke |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Another example - David Icke
|
| Jayen466's proposal revised |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Jayen466's proposal revised
|
| Primary/Secondary sources - do we have the balance right here? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Primary/Secondary sources - do we have the balance right here?
|
| Jayen466's proposal revised (2) |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Jayen466's proposal revised (2)
|
| Jayen466's proposal revised (3) |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 37#Jayen466's proposal revised (3)
|
| Jayen466's proposal revised (4) |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Jayen466's proposal revised (4)
|
| Tertiary and secondary |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Tertiary and secondary
|
| Is this any good? (Jayen466's proposal revised) |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Is this any good? (Jayen466's proposal revised)
|
| religious scripture |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#religious scripture
|
| Secondary sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Secondary sources
|
| Proposed New Section : No Original Logic |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Proposed New Section : No Original Logic
|
| Refer directly |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Refer directly
|
| Notice of copy editing |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Notice of copy editing
|
| Watering down WP:SYN |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Watering down WP:SYN
|
| No Original Logic Leads into SYNTH |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#No Original Logic Leads into SYNTH
|
| WP:OUTING vs. WP:COI & WP:NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#WP:OUTING vs. WP:COI & WP:NOR
|
| Sticking closely to sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Sticking closely to sources
|
| VisionThing's revert |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#VisionThing's revert
|
| Logic |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Logic
|
| “Directly related” — Towards a viable alternative |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#“Directly related” — Towards a viable alternative
|
| Proposal and rationale revised |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Proposal and rationale revised
|
| Comments:Proposal and Rationale revised |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Comments:Proposal and Rationale revised
|
| Original research in plot summaries |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Original research in plot summaries
|
| New No Original Logic Section - 24 hour trial period |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#New No Original Logic Section - 24 hour trial period
|
| Proposal for New Section: No Original Logic |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Proposal for New Section: No Original Logic
|
| Addition to original images policy |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Addition to original images policy
|
| WP:Update |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#WP:Update
|
| No discussion on talk pages |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#No discussion on talk pages
|
| revisions to SYN |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#revisions to SYN
|
| Preferred image license |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Preferred image license
|
| Limitation section |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 38#Limitation section
|
| Discussion about images |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Discussion about images
|
| Regarding maps being "primary sources" according to this policy |
74 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Regarding maps being "primary sources" according to this policy
|
| A question about WP:SYNTH |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#A question about WP:SYNTH
|
| Some concerns with this page, and proposals |
59 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Some concerns with this page, and proposals
|
| The use of sandboxes for policy/guideline pages |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#The use of sandboxes for policy/guideline pages
|
| Protest |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Protest
|
| can a single sentence from a single cited source be SYN? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#can a single sentence from a single cited source be SYN?
|
| Economic freedom |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Economic freedom
|
| Law and Synth |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Law and Synth
|
| Insidious OR |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Insidious OR
|
| types of sources |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#types of sources
|
| Insidious OR (continued) |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Insidious OR (continued)
|
| Not "insidious OR", but there are other issues with the wording |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Not "insidious OR", but there are other issues with the wording
|
| Mentioning media originals as sources is regarded as "Original Research"? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Mentioning media originals as sources is regarded as "Original Research"?
|
| Establishing the scope of the policy: Logical proof |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Establishing the scope of the policy: Logical proof
|
| November Update |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#November Update
|
| Primary sources |
127 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 39#Primary sources
|
| research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#research
|
| RNA magazine to REQUIRE original research posted to Wikipedia |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#RNA magazine to REQUIRE original research posted to Wikipedia
|
| New footnote at end of first paragraph |
61 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#New footnote at end of first paragraph
|
| Directly quoting primary sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Directly quoting primary sources
|
| Inside information |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Inside information
|
| Description vs. interpretation |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Description vs. interpretation
|
| Specialist knowledge |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Specialist knowledge
|
| Specialist knowledge clause violates NPOV |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Specialist knowledge clause violates NPOV
|
| Forest for the trees |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Forest for the trees
|
| Use of letters in biographical articles |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Use of letters in biographical articles
|
| Editing warring in place of consensus? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Editing warring in place of consensus?
|
| The problem, wider |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#The problem, wider
|
| Comparison articles |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Comparison articles
|
| An aside |
64 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#An aside
|
| Small change |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Small change
|
| Peer-reviewed reports of experiments: primary or secondary? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Peer-reviewed reports of experiments: primary or secondary?
|
| Good faith |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Good faith
|
| Lost in the wash |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Lost in the wash
|
| Chemistry verification |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Chemistry verification
|
| Attempting to summarize discussion |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Attempting to summarize discussion
|
| Verifiable... or "easily" Verifiable? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 40#Verifiable... or "easily" Verifiable?
|
| RFC-Specialist knowledge |
72 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#RFC-Specialist knowledge
|
| Failing the "directly related" test - Examples please |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Failing the "directly related" test - Examples please
|
| Question |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Question
|
| Propose keeping a record of decisions for WP:NOR |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Propose keeping a record of decisions for WP:NOR
|
| Getting me to go away |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Getting me to go away
|
| Primary sources: The novel example |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Primary sources: The novel example
|
| Pointing out what an author doesn't say |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Pointing out what an author doesn't say
|
| "add no new information to what is already present" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#"add no new information to what is already present"
|
| Burden of evidence? |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Burden of evidence?
|
| Mathematical proofs |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Mathematical proofs
|
| And again |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#And again
|
| Proposed criteria to replace the "directly related" test |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Proposed criteria to replace the "directly related" test
|
| Question about definition of a primary source |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Question about definition of a primary source
|
| Proposed Change to PSTS |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Proposed Change to PSTS
|
| How to deal with published, refereed experiment reports? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#How to deal with published, refereed experiment reports?
|
| PSTS revised |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#PSTS revised
|
| Are peer-reviewed sources primary? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#Are peer-reviewed sources primary?
|
| On cherry picking and gun jumping |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 41#On cherry picking and gun jumping
|
| Introductory sections of papers |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Introductory sections of papers
|
| New edit |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#New edit
|
| Experimental results language |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Experimental results language
|
| Remove PSTS altogether? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Remove PSTS altogether?
|
| Silly Question |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Silly Question
|
| Experimental results removal |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Experimental results removal
|
| A new approach to the PSTS question |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#A new approach to the PSTS question
|
| Edit warring |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Edit warring
|
| Proposed removal of WP:PSTS from WP:NOR |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Proposed removal of WP:PSTS from WP:NOR
|
| Proposed addition |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Proposed addition
|
| Proposed change to WP:PSTS |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Proposed change to WP:PSTS
|
| Discussion of interest regarding WP:NOR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Discussion of interest regarding WP:NOR
|
| Do WP:NC and WP:NOR conflict? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Do WP:NC and WP:NOR conflict?
|
| How to apply WP:NOR's "Directly related" principle |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#How to apply WP:NOR's "Directly related" principle
|
| Mathematical OR |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Mathematical OR
|
| COI rephrase |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#COI rephrase
|
| Who says what and the consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Who says what and the consensus
|
| Wikipedia as a tertiary source |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Wikipedia as a tertiary source
|
| Should we lock this page? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#Should we lock this page?
|
| wp:syn is hard to understand |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 42#wp:syn is hard to understand
|
| Problem with example of OR in WP:SYN |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Problem with example of OR in WP:SYN
|
| Translations |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Translations
|
| Primary vs.Secondary Sources |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Primary vs.Secondary Sources
|
| Spellings as original research? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Spellings as original research?
|
| This page is damaging the encyclopedia |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#This page is damaging the encyclopedia
|
| Are calculations "synthesis of published material which advances a position"? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Are calculations "synthesis of published material which advances a position"?
|
| Proposed new section: Proofs and calculations |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Proposed new section: Proofs and calculations
|
| On user's comments |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#On user's comments
|
| This Policy is BS |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#This Policy is BS
|
| P v. S |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#P v. S
|
| Synthesis: provided they add no new information |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Synthesis: provided they add no new information
|
| Removed sentence from the lead |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Removed sentence from the lead
|
| Restructuring/streamlining SYNTH |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Restructuring/streamlining SYNTH
|
| Supplemental essay proposal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Supplemental essay proposal
|
| Translations of non-english sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Translations of non-english sources
|
| Graphs, percentages |
68 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Graphs, percentages
|
| "Plagiarism is defined" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#"Plagiarism is defined"
|
| Survey - proposed replacement of example and its discussion in WP:SYNTH |
88 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Survey - proposed replacement of example and its discussion in WP:SYNTH
|
| We need an example of non-syn original research |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#We need an example of non-syn original research
|
| Policy proposal to clarify the "directly related" principle |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Policy proposal to clarify the "directly related" principle
|
| Primary sources |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Primary sources
|
| ORIG |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#ORIG
|
| Math |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Math
|
| Primary sources exception proposal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Primary sources exception proposal
|
| Adjustment of policy |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 43#Adjustment of policy
|
| Proposed changes |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Proposed changes
|
| Edit warring |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Edit warring
|
| Where can I find some help with an editor who doesn't seem to understand what synthesis is? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Where can I find some help with an editor who doesn't seem to understand what synthesis is?
|
| Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Editing policy on integration of policies |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Editing policy on integration of policies
|
| Suggestion to change of policy for Primary sources |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Suggestion to change of policy for Primary sources
|
| Primary Sources/Literary Review |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Primary Sources/Literary Review
|
| Alternate forum needed in parallel with WikiPedia |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Alternate forum needed in parallel with WikiPedia
|
| Personal opinion, as it affects the article: "History of IBM " |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Personal opinion, as it affects the article: "History of IBM "
|
| WP:SYN |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#WP:SYN
|
| Religious primary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Religious primary sources
|
| syllogisms |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#syllogisms
|
| Constructing a fictional character's biography from only primary source - OR/SYN or not? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Constructing a fictional character's biography from only primary source - OR/SYN or not?
|
| WP:SYN |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#WP:SYN 2
|
| Reliable sources |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Reliable sources
|
| More about RS than OR in WP:NOR? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#More about RS than OR in WP:NOR?
|
| Follow-up |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Follow-up
|
| proposed addition |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#proposed addition
|
| bad example for section Synthesis of published material that advances a position |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#bad example for section Synthesis of published material that advances a position
|
| Last paragraph of Reliable sources section should be removed. |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Last paragraph of Reliable sources section should be removed.
|
| Discomfort re NOR |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Discomfort re NOR
|
| Language |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Language
|
| True confessions |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#True confessions
|
| Is a FAQ a Policy? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Is a FAQ a Policy?
|
| Neutrality enforcement: a proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Neutrality enforcement: a proposal
|
| Dilbert, OR and wikipedia |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Dilbert, OR and wikipedia
|
| Examples --> General |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Examples --> General
|
| Synthesis issue? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Synthesis issue?
|
| Citing oneself |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Citing oneself
|
| Cropped images = Original Research? |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Cropped images = Original Research?
|
| Secondary source definition |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Secondary source definition
|
| Example in "Synthesis of published material that advances a position" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Example in "Synthesis of published material that advances a position"
|
| Interviews and re NOR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Interviews and re NOR
|
| On Definition of "Routine Calculation" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#On Definition of "Routine Calculation"
|
| If no reliable third-party sources can be found on an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#If no reliable third-party sources can be found on an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it.
|
| NOR: Synthesis of published material that advances a position |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#NOR: Synthesis of published material that advances a position
|
| Original research and images |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 44#Original research and images
|
| recent deletion of sentence re using self-publication of discovery as source |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#recent deletion of sentence re using self-publication of discovery as source
|
| OR and dynamic numbers |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#OR and dynamic numbers
|
| "below" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#"below"
|
| Bengali romanization |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Bengali romanization
|
| Should not have an article wording, a potential problem |
97 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Should not have an article wording, a potential problem
|
| Is describing the results of a googlesearch original research? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Is describing the results of a googlesearch original research?
|
| SYN addition |
77 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#SYN addition
|
| Video Media Proof |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Video Media Proof
|
| The nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#The nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life
|
| Is the burden of proof on new additions? |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Is the burden of proof on new additions?
|
| Question for Laurent only |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Question for Laurent only
|
| OR examples |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#OR examples
|
| "synthesis" - factually erroneous explanation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#"synthesis" - factually erroneous explanation
|
| Proposed slight amendment to the "synthesis" guidelines |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Proposed slight amendment to the "synthesis" guidelines
|
| Question regard NOR |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Question regard NOR
|
| OR and the usage of historical logos |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#OR and the usage of historical logos
|
| Court cases clarification needed |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Court cases clarification needed
|
| New example in SYN is not synthesis |
49 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#New example in SYN is not synthesis
|
| Help with novice editor |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Help with novice editor
|
| Informal survey – proposed example for WP:SYN |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Informal survey – proposed example for WP:SYN
|
| Feedback for "Historical and scientific accuracies" write-up |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Feedback for "Historical and scientific accuracies" write-up
|
| A bold proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#A bold proposal
|
| "NOR" policy not compliant with usual scientific standards in the field of law |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#"NOR" policy not compliant with usual scientific standards in the field of law
|
| Relaxation of NOR to allow for GPS coordinates on articles |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 45#Relaxation of NOR to allow for GPS coordinates on articles
|
| Letters in a publicly available archive |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Letters in a publicly available archive
|
| Question about "original research" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Question about "original research"
|
| A bolder proposal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#A bolder proposal
|
| "The origin/history of X is obscure/unknown/shrouded in mystery/not well documented," etc. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#"The origin/history of X is obscure/unknown/shrouded in mystery/not well documented," etc.
|
| Wikipedia Policy of Systematically Excluding Views of "Tiny Minorities" is a mistake |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Wikipedia Policy of Systematically Excluding Views of "Tiny Minorities" is a mistake
|
| Proposed Revised Wording regarding "tiny minority" censorship issue |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Proposed Revised Wording regarding "tiny minority" censorship issue
|
| A list of people |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#A list of people
|
| A Request for Comment dealing with interpretation of WP:SYN could use some outside eyes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#A Request for Comment dealing with interpretation of WP:SYN could use some outside eyes
|
| Press releases |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Press releases
|
| Blue sky |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Blue sky
|
| Whose argument is it? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Whose argument is it?
|
| Why the emphasis on 'events' for primary and secondary sources? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Why the emphasis on 'events' for primary and secondary sources?
|
| Recent edits |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Recent edits
|
| WP:SYNTH at 23:22, 27 August 2009 |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#WP:SYNTH at 23:22, 27 August 2009
|
| United Nations and synthesis |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#United Nations and synthesis
|
| Clarification of OR for combining objective sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Clarification of OR for combining objective sources
|
| Primary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Primary sources
|
| RFC - Replace examples in WP:SYNTH with link to examples |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#RFC - Replace examples in WP:SYNTH with link to examples
|
| WP:SYNTH - why does this section exist? |
63 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#WP:SYNTH - why does this section exist?
|
| Original images and license |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Original images and license
|
| Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought.
|
| The boundaries of OR? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#The boundaries of OR?
|
| What are the basic rules here? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#What are the basic rules here?
|
| Sourcing from a patent |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 46#Sourcing from a patent
|
| Proposed SYN changes |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Proposed SYN changes
|
| Interwikilink Bengali wiki |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Interwikilink Bengali wiki
|
| Protection |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Protection
|
| Are there other issues |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Are there other issues
|
| Wikipedia:Conceptualization |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Wikipedia:Conceptualization
|
| Syllogisms and synthesis: Is Socrates mortal? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Syllogisms and synthesis: Is Socrates mortal?
|
| Logical deductions |
318 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Logical deductions
|
| RfC at WP:Civil |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#RfC at WP:Civil
|
| Use of WP:NOR in one-line Edit Summaries |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Use of WP:NOR in one-line Edit Summaries
|
| Question: Where does one go if one wants to insert original research and speculation into an encyclopedia or wiki article? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Question: Where does one go if one wants to insert original research and speculation into an encyclopedia or wiki article?
|
| Primary/Secondary sources in BLP |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Primary/Secondary sources in BLP
|
| Why are articles not written by the foremost experts? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Why are articles not written by the foremost experts?
|
| Creating only English source for information |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Creating only English source for information
|
| Interviews as Primary Sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Interviews as Primary Sources
|
| Quote added to lead |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 47#Quote added to lead
|
| Primary, secondary and tertiary – item order reversal |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Primary, secondary and tertiary – item order reversal
|
| Unclear wording under Verifiability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Unclear wording under Verifiability
|
| The reasoning? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#The reasoning?
|
| Are translations primary or secondary sources? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Are translations primary or secondary sources?
|
| RfC on RS |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#RfC on RS
|
| ...that serves to advance a position. |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#...that serves to advance a position.
|
| Introductory surveys of previous work in primary peer-reviewed publications as secondary sources |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Introductory surveys of previous work in primary peer-reviewed publications as secondary sources
|
| See also and categories |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#See also and categories
|
| Proposed Amendment to no original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Proposed Amendment to no original research
|
| Why secondary sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Why secondary sources
|
| "No original research + notable sources" prohibits evidence, prohibits Nullius in Verba. |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#"No original research + notable sources" prohibits evidence, prohibits Nullius in Verba.
|
| Plot elements |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Plot elements
|
| "Rely mainly" |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#"Rely mainly"
|
| Are "plot summaries" made by WP editors Original Research? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Are "plot summaries" made by WP editors Original Research?
|
| Signpost Policy Report |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Signpost Policy Report
|
| Question 1 regarding primary sources |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Question 1 regarding primary sources
|
| "Carefully summarizing..." paragraph- better in lead or synth? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#"Carefully summarizing..." paragraph- better in lead or synth?
|
| Areas of islands |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Areas of islands
|
| WP:SYNTH: add the word "new" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#WP:SYNTH: add the word "new"
|
| "original research" on games.. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#"original research" on games..
|
| Deletion of examples of primary sources from PSTS |
130 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#Deletion of examples of primary sources from PSTS
|
| An example of original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#An example of original research
|
| An OI |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#An OI
|
| "Comparison of" articles |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 48#"Comparison of" articles
|
| Unsourced claims in self-made image captions |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Unsourced claims in self-made image captions
|
| But does not the OR policy restrict Wikipedia content to that found only in traditional publications? |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#But does not the OR policy restrict Wikipedia content to that found only in traditional publications?
|
| Wikipedia is BUILT on Synthesis ("OR") in non-Controversial areas, and needs to acknowledge it to better move forward |
130 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Wikipedia is BUILT on Synthesis ("OR") in non-Controversial areas, and needs to acknowledge it to better move forward
|
| Changes have been made in the lead towards topic of WP:V |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Changes have been made in the lead towards topic of WP:V
|
| Releated RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Releated RFC
|
| Religious Documents: Primary Sources? |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Religious Documents: Primary Sources?
|
| How about this as a references structure? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#How about this as a references structure?
|
| Original images with scientific claims |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Original images with scientific claims
|
| Linking to our article on Original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Linking to our article on Original research
|
| Does selection of sources violate original synthesis? |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Does selection of sources violate original synthesis?
|
| Argumentum ex silentio and WP policy |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Argumentum ex silentio and WP policy
|
| Text vs. other media |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Text vs. other media
|
| Neologism synthesis from "phrase hits" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Neologism synthesis from "phrase hits"
|
| Nonsense statements |
92 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Nonsense statements
|
| Copy edit |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Copy edit
|
| A note about editing this policy |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#A note about editing this policy
|
| Second sentence |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 49#Second sentence
|
| Primary sources reliably published. |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Primary sources reliably published.
|
| Reliably published |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Reliably published
|
| Lead |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Lead
|
| Wikipedia is built upon violating NOR |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Wikipedia is built upon violating NOR
|
| WP:ALT |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#WP:ALT
|
| Colour |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Colour
|
| All of Wikipedia content is either plagiarism or original research! |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#All of Wikipedia content is either plagiarism or original research!
|
| Evaluating the reliability of sources is original research |
48 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Evaluating the reliability of sources is original research
|
| Trying to assertain where this example would stand w.r.t. PSTS |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Trying to assertain where this example would stand w.r.t. PSTS
|
| Advancing a position |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Advancing a position
|
| Guessing years of birth is not routine calculation |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Guessing years of birth is not routine calculation
|
| Wikilinks inside quotes |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Wikilinks inside quotes
|
| wp:quote |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#wp:quote
|
| Duplication of Verifiability |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Duplication of Verifiability
|
| WP:SYN allows strawman fallacy & false premises |
171 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#WP:SYN allows strawman fallacy & false premises
|
| Synth bullets |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Synth bullets
|
| Nutshell |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 50#Nutshell
|
| The trouble with SYN |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#The trouble with SYN
|
| Unverifiable ≠ Original research |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Unverifiable ≠ Original research
|
| "advances a position" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#"advances a position"
|
| Definition of NOR |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Definition of NOR
|
| Removal of "If you are able to discover something new..." |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Removal of "If you are able to discover something new..."
|
| RfC on merging Words to avoid into Words to watch |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#RfC on merging Words to avoid into Words to watch
|
| New section to discuss NOR in context of purpose and limits of Wikipedia |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#New section to discuss NOR in context of purpose and limits of Wikipedia
|
| RfC: Should the NPOV policy contain two sections devoted to pseudoscience and religion? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#RfC: Should the NPOV policy contain two sections devoted to pseudoscience and religion?
|
| Contradiction in policy |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Contradiction in policy
|
| everything is OR |
67 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#everything is OR
|
| Primary Sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Primary Sources
|
| Beginning of lead |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Beginning of lead
|
| Beginning of lead |
65 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Beginning of lead 2
|
| food for thought... |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#food for thought...
|
| What Does Topic Mean? |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#What Does Topic Mean?
|
| Two ideas to improve this guideline |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Two ideas to improve this guideline
|
| All material in unreliable sources is original research? |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#All material in unreliable sources is original research?
|
| Terminology |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Terminology
|
| Small question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Small question
|
| Small question |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 51#Small question 2
|
| Argument that today's main page FA violates a thorough application of WP:OR+WP:VER |
47 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Argument that today's main page FA violates a thorough application of WP:OR+WP:VER
|
| POLL: Constant misunderstandings about NOR and my proposed solution |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#POLL: Constant misunderstandings about NOR and my proposed solution
|
| Question about original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Question about original research
|
| Draft new ATT proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Draft new ATT proposal
|
| Where lies credibility? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Where lies credibility?
|
| Definition of original research, WP:NOR, and the proposed WP:ATT |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Definition of original research, WP:NOR, and the proposed WP:ATT
|
| Please restore the leading paragraph |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Please restore the leading paragraph
|
| Found a real world example |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Found a real world example
|
| Useful definition? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Useful definition?
|
| Questionable interpretations of SYNTH |
187 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Questionable interpretations of SYNTH
|
| FBI reports as primary sources? |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#FBI reports as primary sources?
|
| Draft new ATT proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Draft new ATT proposal 2
|
| Original Image |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Original Image
|
| Mathematics? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Mathematics?
|
| What does the adverb explicitly really mean? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#What does the adverb explicitly really mean?
|
| Is this synthesis as alledged? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Is this synthesis as alledged?
|
| Newbie |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Newbie
|
| Comments please |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 52#Comments please
|
| Primary Sources: A question regarding policy |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Primary Sources: A question regarding policy
|
| Question 2 regarding primary sources |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Question 2 regarding primary sources
|
| WP:OI: image manipulation for "legitimate" reasons |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#WP:OI: image manipulation for "legitimate" reasons
|
| Simplification for simplifications sake |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Simplification for simplifications sake
|
| Calculating things using current laws |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Calculating things using current laws
|
| Synthesis |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Synthesis
|
| An important discussion on the RSN |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#An important discussion on the RSN
|
| Clarifying synthesis: one more try |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Clarifying synthesis: one more try
|
| "Educated person" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#"Educated person"
|
| "are supported by" |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#"are supported by"
|
| Original research and standards |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Original research and standards
|
| Request for comment un Crum375's pre-proposal |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Request for comment un Crum375's pre-proposal
|
| "For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research." |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#"For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research."
|
| Are "List of" articles exempt? |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Are "List of" articles exempt?
|
| Fresh eyes would be appreciated |
33 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Fresh eyes would be appreciated
|
| WP:ESSAYS |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#WP:ESSAYS
|
| Abuse of primary sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Abuse of primary sources
|
| Talk pages |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Talk pages
|
| "advance a position" |
30 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#"advance a position"
|
| Explicitism and Implicitism in debates on SYNTH/OR |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Explicitism and Implicitism in debates on SYNTH/OR
|
| Synth - "true" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Synth - "true"
|
| "analysis and synthesis" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#"analysis and synthesis"
|
| Serious NPOV/SYNTH problem with List of films considered the worst and best |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Serious NPOV/SYNTH problem with List of films considered the worst and best
|
| Defining documents as sources |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Defining documents as sources
|
| Documentaries (again) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Documentaries (again)
|
| Requiring outside sources to comply with NOR |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Requiring outside sources to comply with NOR
|
| source both secondary and primary |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#source both secondary and primary
|
| peer-reviewed journals by other than university presses |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#peer-reviewed journals by other than university presses
|
| Transitive synthesis |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#Transitive synthesis
|
| OR or weight or what? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 53#OR or weight or what?
|
| Resolving tension between WP:NOR and WP:Plagiarism |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Resolving tension between WP:NOR and WP:Plagiarism
|
| Is there a gray area between primary and secondary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Is there a gray area between primary and secondary sources?
|
| RfC on the relationship between the sourcing policies and guidelines |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#RfC on the relationship between the sourcing policies and guidelines
|
| A Question. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#A Question.
|
| Talk pages by size |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Talk pages by size
|
| Calculations using well known mathematics is not original research |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Calculations using well known mathematics is not original research
|
| Query |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Query
|
| Template: Religious text primary, and Template: Primary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Template: Religious text primary, and Template: Primary sources
|
| Sometimes |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Sometimes
|
| FollowIng reliable sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#FollowIng reliable sources
|
| Images |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Images
|
| WP:PSTS |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#WP:PSTS
|
| NOR concerns |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#NOR concerns
|
| Citing oneself -- redux |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Citing oneself -- redux
|
| Citing oneself |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Citing oneself
|
| Synthesis (WP:SYN) |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Synthesis (WP:SYN)
|
| General question: relevant info not mentioning topic |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#General question: relevant info not mentioning topic
|
| Do OR rules allow counting or arithmetic? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Do OR rules allow counting or arithmetic?
|
| Days of a week and dates |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Days of a week and dates
|
| Where will WP orthodoxy lead? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Where will WP orthodoxy lead?
|
| Where will WP orthodoxy lead? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Where will WP orthodoxy lead? 2
|
| Rigorous expression, example 1 |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Rigorous expression, example 1
|
| Atrocious writing |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Atrocious writing
|
| Ancient primary sources |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Ancient primary sources
|
| dubious |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#dubious
|
| Back to the modest beginnings of this discussion |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Back to the modest beginnings of this discussion
|
| Do not make analytic...claims about material found in a primary source |
106 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Do not make analytic...claims about material found in a primary source
|
| Editors making changes to policy |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Editors making changes to policy
|
| Editors reverting changes to policy |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Editors reverting changes to policy
|
| Some secondary sources ... |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 54#Some secondary sources ...
|
| Using sources: redundant passage? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Using sources: redundant passage?
|
| RfC on citing oneself |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#RfC on citing oneself
|
| Quoting in citations to help readers quickly check source content |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Quoting in citations to help readers quickly check source content
|
| Translations and transcriptions |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Translations and transcriptions
|
| A situation when primary sources can be considered secondary or tertiary sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#A situation when primary sources can be considered secondary or tertiary sources
|
| Medieval annals are to be treated as secondary sources |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Medieval annals are to be treated as secondary sources
|
| Confused |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Confused
|
| Should this policy be made more restrictive? |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Should this policy be made more restrictive?
|
| ATTENTION Admins, let's have a name change... |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#ATTENTION Admins, let's have a name change...
|
| Transcripts |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Transcripts
|
| Other things |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Other things
|
| Why we have two pages saying much the same things |
29 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Why we have two pages saying much the same things
|
| Use "explicit" instead of "direct" |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Use "explicit" instead of "direct"
|
| Unsourceable |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Unsourceable
|
| Further issues with the primary/secondary/tertiary sources section |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 55#Further issues with the primary/secondary/tertiary sources section
|
| WP:NOR should stay on topic |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#WP:NOR should stay on topic
|
| For consideration |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#For consideration
|
| tertiary sources |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#tertiary sources
|
| Multi article SYNTH |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Multi article SYNTH
|
| Table of Contents structure, Mind maps |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Table of Contents structure, Mind maps
|
| Ithaca college library link |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Ithaca college library link
|
| PSTS |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#PSTS
|
| "Common sense is not original research" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#"Common sense is not original research"
|
| This... sucks |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#This... sucks
|
| This policy is being abused, badly! |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#This policy is being abused, badly!
|
| Routine interpretations |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Routine interpretations
|
| Without radical reform of this policy, Wikipedia will be doomed |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Without radical reform of this policy, Wikipedia will be doomed
|
| Reputable computer programs, and maps |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Reputable computer programs, and maps
|
| Idea for a way to allow indirect original research |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Idea for a way to allow indirect original research
|
| What is a routine mathematical calculation? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#What is a routine mathematical calculation?
|
| Editing policy for this policy page |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Editing policy for this policy page
|
| Published |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Published
|
| Synthesis-by-omission |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Synthesis-by-omission
|
| Original research and patent rubbish |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Original research and patent rubbish
|
| Do original images require a source? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Do original images require a source?
|
| A request for thoughtful opinions |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#A request for thoughtful opinions
|
| Removal of material using OR |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Removal of material using OR
|
| how long? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#how long?
|
| quote-diving |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#quote-diving
|
| Synthesis by juxtaposition |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Synthesis by juxtaposition
|
| PSTS: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#PSTS: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
|
| Is this routine calculation per WP:CALC? Second opinion please. |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Is this routine calculation per WP:CALC? Second opinion please.
|
| Slightly expand CALC |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Slightly expand CALC
|
| Translations into English of album and song titles |
37 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Translations into English of album and song titles
|
| Is providing context SYNTH? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Is providing context SYNTH?
|
| I hate SYNTH |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#I hate SYNTH
|
| Need to clarify image sourcing policy (WP:OI) |
42 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Need to clarify image sourcing policy (WP:OI)
|
| Linking an essay |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Linking an essay
|
| Does WP:OR apply to the correct spelling of celebrity's names, or just apply to ideas and such? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Does WP:OR apply to the correct spelling of celebrity's names, or just apply to ideas and such?
|
| Primary sources - a problem with the wording |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Primary sources - a problem with the wording
|
| Are these primary, secondary or tertiary? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Are these primary, secondary or tertiary?
|
| "Controversial" in first sentence of lede, based on primary source |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#"Controversial" in first sentence of lede, based on primary source
|
| RfC: Are maps in general secondary sources? |
28 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#RfC: Are maps in general secondary sources?
|
| Research vs incorrect information |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Research vs incorrect information
|
| RFC notice |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#RFC notice
|
| Proposal to change first sentence of wp:ver |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Proposal to change first sentence of wp:ver
|
| Secondary source clarity needed |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Secondary source clarity needed
|
| "Synthesis" indeed! |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#"Synthesis" indeed!
|
| "Novel Synthesis" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#"Novel Synthesis"
|
| Allowance of Logical Deduction in WP:NOTOR |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Allowance of Logical Deduction in WP:NOTOR
|
| Accidental original research |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Accidental original research
|
| Contradicting primary and secondary sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Contradicting primary and secondary sources
|
| Secondary does not mean third-party |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Secondary does not mean third-party
|
| Is this map a synthesis |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Is this map a synthesis
|
| Wikiversity |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Wikiversity
|
| Identifying and using primary and secondary sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Identifying and using primary and secondary sources
|
| Prince Michael of Albany |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Prince Michael of Albany
|
| Incorporating WP:NOTOR |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Incorporating WP:NOTOR
|
| Interviews are not primary sources |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Interviews are not primary sources
|
| RFC Notice - proposed changes to WP:Verifiability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#RFC Notice - proposed changes to WP:Verifiability
|
| Dissenting View |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Dissenting View
|
| Reporting an event |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Reporting an event
|
| "Primary, secondary and tertiary sources" — Hard Facts |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#"Primary, secondary and tertiary sources" — Hard Facts
|
| Original images...diagrams and graphs? |
35 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Original images...diagrams and graphs?
|
| Interviews count as primary, but it says for GNG you need secondary sources. |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Interviews count as primary, but it says for GNG you need secondary sources.
|
| Deaths using primary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Deaths using primary sources
|
| RfC on "verifiability, not truth" |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#RfC on "verifiability, not truth"
|
| Have to ask |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Have to ask
|
| Possible enhancement of WP:CALC |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Possible enhancement of WP:CALC
|
| No original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#No original research
|
| In a BLP |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#In a BLP
|
| Discussion and poll with implication for WP:CALC at talk:Usage share of web browsers |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Discussion and poll with implication for WP:CALC at talk:Usage share of web browsers
|
| Could use some input |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Could use some input
|
| The concept of primary and secondary sources is not logically consistent. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#The concept of primary and secondary sources is not logically consistent.
|
| WP:CALC phrasing |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#WP:CALC phrasing
|
| Not sure where to raise this |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Not sure where to raise this
|
| Wikipedia:SOPA initiative |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Wikipedia:SOPA initiative
|
| Is aggregation of primary sources synthesis? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Is aggregation of primary sources synthesis?
|
| Policy on primary sources is too extreme |
36 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Policy on primary sources is too extreme
|
| open research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#open research
|
| Text too short to convey meaning |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Text too short to convey meaning
|
| Wifione general approach is wrong |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Wifione general approach is wrong
|
| RfC: Policy on primary sources is too extreme |
100 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#RfC: Policy on primary sources is too extreme
|
| Based on what ground the statement "XXX is a term" can be made in WP articles? |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Based on what ground the statement "XXX is a term" can be made in WP articles?
|
| Educating our editors |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Educating our editors
|
| Clarification of what constitutes a primary or secondary source |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Clarification of what constitutes a primary or secondary source
|
| Illustrations as original research / synthesis |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Illustrations as original research / synthesis
|
| How to say "no" nicely? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#How to say "no" nicely?
|
| Date and time calculations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Date and time calculations
|
| original research on images on Commons |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#original research on images on Commons
|
| RfC archived; just got announcement; proposal |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#RfC archived; just got announcement; proposal
|
| can editors base the naming of articles on original research |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#can editors base the naming of articles on original research
|
| Revert of my edit |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Revert of my edit
|
| Is this a primary source, if so, how does the WP:NOR policy apply to it? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Is this a primary source, if so, how does the WP:NOR policy apply to it?
|
| Web search results |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Web search results
|
| Original Research from reliable primary sources for exclusion, not inclusion |
14 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Original Research from reliable primary sources for exclusion, not inclusion
|
| Dividing line between "Published/Reliable" and "Original Research" ? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Dividing line between "Published/Reliable" and "Original Research" ?
|
| Talk:Trollhunter#Move to Trolljegeren? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Talk:Trollhunter#Move to Trolljegeren?
|
| Dictionary as a source |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Dictionary as a source
|
| Scientific papers in peer reviewed publications as supporting citations |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Scientific papers in peer reviewed publications as supporting citations
|
| suggest addition to point out that primary sources such as interviews do count towards notability |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#suggest addition to point out that primary sources such as interviews do count towards notability
|
| Exceptions for primary sources |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Exceptions for primary sources
|
| Fringe, established facts and synthesis |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Fringe, established facts and synthesis
|
| Academic question: Does recognizing something count as OR? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Academic question: Does recognizing something count as OR?
|
| New edits to WP:CALC |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#New edits to WP:CALC
|
| Is simple logic a SYNTH ? |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Is simple logic a SYNTH ?
|
| List articles and NOR |
76 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#List articles and NOR
|
| RfC on the verifiability policy lede |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#RfC on the verifiability policy lede
|
| Newspapers (again...) |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Newspapers (again...)
|
| Synthesis example |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Synthesis example
|
| WP:WAF conflict with WP:NOR? |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#WP:WAF conflict with WP:NOR?
|
| IUPAC names for chemicals, especially for drugs |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#IUPAC names for chemicals, especially for drugs
|
| Eyes |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Eyes
|
| Too many primary sources? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Too many primary sources?
|
| Replaced with the correct text from the consensus version of WP:V? |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Replaced with the correct text from the consensus version of WP:V?
|
| OR, truth |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#OR, truth
|
| OR, Verifiability, Accuracy |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#OR, Verifiability, Accuracy
|
| Original mathematical proofs are not interpretations |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Original mathematical proofs are not interpretations
|
| Propose change to sentence regarding primary sources |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Propose change to sentence regarding primary sources
|
| RfC about WP:BLPPRIMARY |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#RfC about WP:BLPPRIMARY
|
| Invitation to discussion |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 57#Invitation to discussion
|
| Newspapers |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Newspapers
|
| Importance of tertiary sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Importance of tertiary sources
|
| Content in templates |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Content in templates
|
| Journal articles = primary sources for technical topics, right? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Journal articles = primary sources for technical topics, right?
|
| experiences with NOR in the german wiki |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#experiences with NOR in the german wiki
|
| Beatles RfC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Beatles RfC
|
| Secondary does not mean independent |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Secondary does not mean independent
|
| Disagreement over WP:CALC |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Disagreement over WP:CALC
|
| Original sci/math papers as primary sources |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Original sci/math papers as primary sources
|
| Location independent |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Location independent
|
| "A book review too can be" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#"A book review too can be"
|
| Exceptions? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Exceptions?
|
| Exceptions to WP:NOR in Math/logic/philosophy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Exceptions to WP:NOR in Math/logic/philosophy
|
| Reliable photography (not distorted or manipulated) : reference or comparison with it. |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Reliable photography (not distorted or manipulated) : reference or comparison with it.
|
| Statistic examples and routine calculations |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Statistic examples and routine calculations
|
| "Timeline of ..." history articles |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#"Timeline of ..." history articles
|
| When is summarizing five critics' reviews an example of synthesis? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#When is summarizing five critics' reviews an example of synthesis?
|
| Question about original research |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Question about original research
|
| synthesis |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#synthesis
|
| Why does Wikipedia prefer secondary sources to primary sources? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Why does Wikipedia prefer secondary sources to primary sources?
|
| References |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#References
|
| "There were no buts in the sources" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#"There were no buts in the sources"
|
| RfC on synthesis |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#RfC on synthesis
|
| Routine calculations |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Routine calculations
|
| Enhancements regarding the mother of all WP:OR and WP:Synth questions |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Enhancements regarding the mother of all WP:OR and WP:Synth questions
|
| OR: |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#OR:
|
| Schizo this: |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Schizo this:
|
| "...that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge" |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#"...that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge"
|
| On ""facts by omission" points" |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#On ""facts by omission" points"
|
| OR to disprove |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#OR to disprove
|
| Non-investigative journalism is often tertiary |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Non-investigative journalism is often tertiary
|
| Simple math operations ? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Simple math operations ?
|
| Synthesis and definitions |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Synthesis and definitions
|
| Proposed Sub-section for WP:NOR |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Proposed Sub-section for WP:NOR
|
| "Directly related" exceptions? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#"Directly related" exceptions?
|
| Question for FAC: Does it violate WP:NOR/WP:SYN by counting lines of poetry? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Question for FAC: Does it violate WP:NOR/WP:SYN by counting lines of poetry?
|
| Original research as a source |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Original research as a source
|
| Synthesis of published material that advances a position? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Synthesis of published material that advances a position?
|
| Historic Photographs |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Historic Photographs
|
| Synthesis and definitional questions |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Synthesis and definitional questions
|
| Sources that contain both primary & secondary material (interviews)? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Sources that contain both primary & secondary material (interviews)?
|
| Technical term for PST |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Technical term for PST
|
| Primary sourcing from laws |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Primary sourcing from laws
|
| Clarification regarding primary sources |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Clarification regarding primary sources
|
| First two sentences of section "Primary, secondary and tertiary sources" |
100 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#First two sentences of section "Primary, secondary and tertiary sources"
|
| On noting the absence of sources |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#On noting the absence of sources
|
| Proposal re introduction to section "Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources" |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Proposal re introduction to section "Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources"
|
| Statistical operations |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Statistical operations
|
| Summarizations based on routine calculations |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Summarizations based on routine calculations
|
| Proposal to add subsection "Numerical summarizations" |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Proposal to add subsection "Numerical summarizations"
|
| Working definition numerical tratment |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Working definition numerical tratment
|
| Transferring consolidated discussion to an essay |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Transferring consolidated discussion to an essay
|
| Propose change to footnote on book reviews |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#Propose change to footnote on book reviews
|
| OR as applied to figures |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 58#OR as applied to figures
|
| Proposed modification of WP:OR regarding figures |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Proposed modification of WP:OR regarding figures
|
| Proposal for new policy |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Proposal for new policy
|
| Proposal for new policy |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Proposal for new policy 2
|
| Leading section |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Leading section
|
| Revised proposal regarding OR and figures |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Revised proposal regarding OR and figures
|
| Please help to conclude discussion about numerical data |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Please help to conclude discussion about numerical data
|
| Wikipedia:About Valid Routine Calculations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Wikipedia:About Valid Routine Calculations
|
| Justifying "widely" by using numerous sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Justifying "widely" by using numerous sources
|
| "Historical inaccuracies" sections |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#"Historical inaccuracies" sections
|
| "Historical inaccuracies" sections |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#"Historical inaccuracies" sections 2
|
| WP:NOR/WP:SYN and retroactive use of new names |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#WP:NOR/WP:SYN and retroactive use of new names
|
| WP:NOR/WP:SYN and retroactive use of new names |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#WP:NOR/WP:SYN and retroactive use of new names 2
|
| Sources required for music |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Sources required for music
|
| Sources required for music |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Sources required for music 2
|
| Routine Calculation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Routine Calculation
|
| Routine Calculation |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Routine Calculation 2
|
| Genoa, Italy was where Christopher Columbus was born. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Genoa, Italy was where Christopher Columbus was born.
|
| Genoa, Italy was where Christopher Columbus was born. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Genoa, Italy was where Christopher Columbus was born. 2
|
| WP:OR and article structure |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#WP:OR and article structure
|
| WP:OR and article structure |
46 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#WP:OR and article structure 2
|
| Proposed change in WP:OR |
58 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Proposed change in WP:OR
|
| Another attempt |
43 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Another attempt
|
| Should concept maps be removed because they are original research or synthesis? |
51 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Should concept maps be removed because they are original research or synthesis?
|
| wikt:template:original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#wikt:template:original research
|
| Is it OK to claim that 14 is more than 16? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Is it OK to claim that 14 is more than 16?
|
| One's own personal eye witness information |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#One's own personal eye witness information
|
| Original use of images |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Original use of images
|
| Reverse original research |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Reverse original research
|
| OR/SYNTH contravention? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#OR/SYNTH contravention?
|
| Third party sources and tertiary sources , Hitler and Mussolini (OR rules) |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Third party sources and tertiary sources , Hitler and Mussolini (OR rules)
|
| Counting -- possible addition to WP:CALC |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Counting -- possible addition to WP:CALC
|
| Minor clarification add "primary" |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Minor clarification add "primary"
|
| Interviews clarification |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Interviews clarification
|
| WP:OI |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#WP:OI
|
| List of American beach volleyball players |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#List of American beach volleyball players
|
| Explaining rejections? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Explaining rejections?
|
| What do cautions about primary sources mean? |
25 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#What do cautions about primary sources mean?
|
| Neutral notification of ongoing discussion at Talk:Bradbury Building |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Neutral notification of ongoing discussion at Talk:Bradbury Building
|
| A further exploration of WP:OR policy |
134 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#A further exploration of WP:OR policy
|
| Considering NOR Revision--Debate; Baseball bats and car windows |
44 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Considering NOR Revision--Debate; Baseball bats and car windows
|
| Synthesis of published material that advances a position |
38 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Synthesis of published material that advances a position
|
| Reliably published |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Reliably published
|
| "Quaternary sources"? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#"Quaternary sources"?
|
| Experts Excluded |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Experts Excluded
|
| Mainstream newspapers |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 59#Mainstream newspapers
|
| Translations |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Translations
|
| Synonyms |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Synonyms
|
| National Archives |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#National Archives
|
| Cannibalistic tertiary sources |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Cannibalistic tertiary sources
|
| Lists of appearances |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Lists of appearances
|
| "advance a position" should be added back |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#"advance a position" should be added back
|
| Wikipedia:PRIMARYNOTBAD |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Wikipedia:PRIMARYNOTBAD
|
| Question about routine calculations |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Question about routine calculations
|
| Insider's view |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Insider's view
|
| Illustrations violating NOR |
26 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Illustrations violating NOR
|
| Proposing changes to Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review |
76 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Proposing changes to Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review
|
| Simple summation across sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Simple summation across sources
|
| Wikipedia:Interviews |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Wikipedia:Interviews
|
| Hyperlinks within a source |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Hyperlinks within a source
|
| Are unsourced topic sentences in Reception paragraphs OR? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Are unsourced topic sentences in Reception paragraphs OR?
|
| Very mild OR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Very mild OR
|
| Continued confusion about whether it is a source (or "material") that is OR or editing actions that are OR |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Continued confusion about whether it is a source (or "material") that is OR or editing actions that are OR
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2014 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2014
|
| Paris is not the capital of France |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Paris is not the capital of France
|
| Template:Primary sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Template:Primary sources
|
| Primary and secondary sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Primary and secondary sources
|
| Plotting graph based on published data |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Plotting graph based on published data
|
| Secondary and tertiary sources |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Secondary and tertiary sources
|
| No OR is a bad policy, in my view. |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#No OR is a bad policy, in my view.
|
| Difference between this and WP:COATRACK |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Difference between this and WP:COATRACK
|
| Fiction |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Fiction
|
| Definition of Research |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Definition of Research
|
| Is WP:Cherrypicking#Contradictions invalidated by WP:STICKTOSOURCE? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Is WP:Cherrypicking#Contradictions invalidated by WP:STICKTOSOURCE?
|
| Can Cabinet Papers be used as sources? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Can Cabinet Papers be used as sources?
|
| Twitter and other online posts as a primary source. |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Twitter and other online posts as a primary source.
|
| All policy must fit in one sentence |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#All policy must fit in one sentence
|
| RfC at WikiProject Film |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#RfC at WikiProject Film
|
| Can we really state that x book doesn't contain Y statement with no source other than the book? |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Can we really state that x book doesn't contain Y statement with no source other than the book?
|
| Reliable sources reliably published |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Reliable sources reliably published
|
| Flat statement in lead that NOR does not apply on talk pages |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Flat statement in lead that NOR does not apply on talk pages
|
| Closing lame loopholes |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Closing lame loopholes
|
| The "about primary sources" clause |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#The "about primary sources" clause
|
| Can I use an educational institute's website to say it isn't accredited? |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Can I use an educational institute's website to say it isn't accredited?
|
| In a cited reliable secondary source |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#In a cited reliable secondary source
|
| Publication by a Wikipedian? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Publication by a Wikipedian?
|
| Peculiar question about SYNTHESIS |
63 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Peculiar question about SYNTHESIS
|
| Blueboar's History of Wikipeida Policies |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Blueboar's History of Wikipeida Policies
|
| Proposal on "rather than OR" wording |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Proposal on "rather than OR" wording
|
| Television template encouraging OR? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Television template encouraging OR?
|
| RfC: Should "news articles" be added to WP:PRIMARY? |
72 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC: Should "news articles" be added to WP:PRIMARY?
|
| Seeking out answers by contacting primary sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 60#Seeking out answers by contacting primary sources
|
| "an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim" |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#"an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim"
|
| Primary source – example of scientific paper |
64 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Primary source – example of scientific paper
|
| When to fact tag vs. just delete |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#When to fact tag vs. just delete
|
| OR making its way into mainstream thought? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#OR making its way into mainstream thought?
|
| Scientific sources, WP:SYNTH and OR in current events articles |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Scientific sources, WP:SYNTH and OR in current events articles
|
| MEDRS and primary/secondary |
41 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#MEDRS and primary/secondary
|
| Proposal to add a note to tertiary sources section |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Proposal to add a note to tertiary sources section
|
| Elaboration on "routine calculations" |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Elaboration on "routine calculations"
|
| Transcribing |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Transcribing
|
| Wrong rules about primary vs. secondary sources |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Wrong rules about primary vs. secondary sources
|
| I disagree with the "No original research" policy |
15 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#I disagree with the "No original research" policy
|
| This page appears blank on my browser |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#This page appears blank on my browser
|
| RfC announce: What does Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) cover? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC announce: What does Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) cover?
|
| Maybe I'm being dumb here, but better to ask and be the wiser |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Maybe I'm being dumb here, but better to ask and be the wiser
|
| Primary, secondary and tertiary sources |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
|
| Sections for discussing types of OR to serve as cautionary examples |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Sections for discussing types of OR to serve as cautionary examples
|
| Removing citations to "apparently predatory publishers" |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Removing citations to "apparently predatory publishers"
|
| Implied conclusions |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Implied conclusions
|
| Open science |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Open science
|
| WP:PRIMARY is abused and out of control |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#WP:PRIMARY is abused and out of control
|
| Use of primary sources and secondary sources. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Use of primary sources and secondary sources.
|
| Website information |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Website information
|
| Gregorian centuries, routine calculations, and WP:SYNTH |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Gregorian centuries, routine calculations, and WP:SYNTH
|
| RfC notice: image montages of individual faces on ethnicity and other demonym articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC notice: image montages of individual faces on ethnicity and other demonym articles
|
| primary vs. secondary sources for "age of consent" articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#primary vs. secondary sources for "age of consent" articles
|
| Plot summaries? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Plot summaries?
|
| Author! |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Author!
|
| Terminology and WP:Synthesis |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Terminology and WP:Synthesis
|
| RfC on expanded use of pull-quote templates with "giant quotation marks" for any quotations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC on expanded use of pull-quote templates with "giant quotation marks" for any quotations
|
| RfC: Placing films in the Category:Films about hebephilia |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC: Placing films in the Category:Films about hebephilia
|
| Transcription of English audio |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Transcription of English audio
|
| Lack of volunteers in Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Lack of volunteers in Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard?
|
| Article about an amateur who researched stone circles |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Article about an amateur who researched stone circles
|
| Copyright, plagiarism, and original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Copyright, plagiarism, and original research
|
| Evaluation of sources as OR? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Evaluation of sources as OR?
|
| Is 222 approximately 200? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Is 222 approximately 200?
|
| Glossary of Indian Classical Music |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Glossary of Indian Classical Music
|
| Newspapers as primary or secondary sources |
45 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Newspapers as primary or secondary sources
|
| Another RfC discussion at Talk:Cold War II |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Another RfC discussion at Talk:Cold War II
|
| Finding a bunch of instances and then saying there's "many" of them - is that WP:SYNTH |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Finding a bunch of instances and then saying there's "many" of them - is that WP:SYNTH
|
| Everything on wikipedia is original synthesis |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Everything on wikipedia is original synthesis
|
| Secondary vs non-primary |
18 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Secondary vs non-primary
|
| Slight modification on translation policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Slight modification on translation policy
|
| More detail needed on what this quote from source policy- "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia..." |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#More detail needed on what this quote from source policy- "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia..."
|
| RfC on the WP:ANDOR guideline |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#RfC on the WP:ANDOR guideline
|
| Neutral notice |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Neutral notice
|
| Implicit synthesis |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Implicit synthesis
|
| How to describe the Emmett Till case in the lead sentence of the Emmett Till article |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#How to describe the Emmett Till case in the lead sentence of the Emmett Till article
|
| No published source? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#No published source?
|
| Interpretation of images / images as source |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Interpretation of images / images as source
|
| odissa & midnapur district |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#odissa & midnapur district
|
| Re-proposal to include Wikibooks as part of cross-wiki search results |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Re-proposal to include Wikibooks as part of cross-wiki search results
|
| Peer reviewed scientific papers as primary sources? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Peer reviewed scientific papers as primary sources?
|
| FreeBMD |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#FreeBMD
|
| Obligation to discuss noncontroversial but unnecessary clarifications on which there is no actual disgreement? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Obligation to discuss noncontroversial but unnecessary clarifications on which there is no actual disgreement?
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2017 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2017
|
| Estimate the year of birth… |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Estimate the year of birth…
|
| Are press releases and media coverage primary or secondary sources? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Are press releases and media coverage primary or secondary sources?
|
| Does this count as "original research"? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Does this count as "original research"?
|
| Attention needed to clear up serious confusion about secondary sourcing on the part of the film wikiproject |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Attention needed to clear up serious confusion about secondary sourcing on the part of the film wikiproject
|
| Serious and deep seated OR issue needing experts |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Serious and deep seated OR issue needing experts
|
| WP:PSTS, MOS:TONE/MOS:FICT, and reviews of fictional works |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#WP:PSTS, MOS:TONE/MOS:FICT, and reviews of fictional works
|
| Are interviews considered secondary sources? |
52 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Are interviews considered secondary sources?
|
| Opinions needed at Surrealism |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 61#Opinions needed at Surrealism
|
| Synthesis of published material examples format |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Synthesis of published material examples format
|
| Synthesis of published material redundant wording |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Synthesis of published material redundant wording
|
| Images |
55 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Images
|
| Major revision for Wikipedia: OR: obscure reference, not 'original research' |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Major revision for Wikipedia: OR: obscure reference, not 'original research'
|
| Original research authors hb quoted in the article. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Original research authors hb quoted in the article.
|
| The Emperor's New Clothes ? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#The Emperor's New Clothes ?
|
| Making comparisons ? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Making comparisons ?
|
| Proposed amendment on SYNTH |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Proposed amendment on SYNTH
|
| Acceptable sources |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Acceptable sources
|
| Primary source VS secondary source |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Primary source VS secondary source
|
| Nationality of television series |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Nationality of television series
|
| Primary Sources and COI |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Primary Sources and COI
|
| Frequently misinterpreted sourcing policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Frequently misinterpreted sourcing policy
|
| Rfc on How we interpret "published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article" |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Rfc on How we interpret "published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article"
|
| Trypophobia article -- using wording from quoted text |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Trypophobia article -- using wording from quoted text
|
| Third-party vs. independent |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Third-party vs. independent
|
| Is this too synthetic? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is this too synthetic?
|
| cutting link boxes |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#cutting link boxes
|
| Remedy for WP:PRIMARY? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Remedy for WP:PRIMARY?
|
| Expert Knowledge vs Original Research - A Question |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Expert Knowledge vs Original Research - A Question
|
| Should reviews and databases be considered secondary or tertiary sources? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Should reviews and databases be considered secondary or tertiary sources?
|
| Requesting opinions on Dark wave and potential SYNTH concerns |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Requesting opinions on Dark wave and potential SYNTH concerns
|
| Legal Requirements |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Legal Requirements
|
| This page should make it explicit that OR can be grounds for page deletion |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#This page should make it explicit that OR can be grounds for page deletion
|
| Usage of maps |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Usage of maps
|
| This is a dumb policy |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#This is a dumb policy
|
| Request for comment on Wikipedia:Interviews |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Request for comment on Wikipedia:Interviews
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2018 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2018
|
| When does a news article become a secondary source |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#When does a news article become a secondary source
|
| Provide "Copy and Paste" Hotlink Text of This (and Other) Wikipedia Policies |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Provide "Copy and Paste" Hotlink Text of This (and Other) Wikipedia Policies
|
| Islamophobia bar chart feedback requested |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Islamophobia bar chart feedback requested
|
| "Instrumentalism" as original research. |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Instrumentalism" as original research.
|
| What if there are no sources but I know something to be true? |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#What if there are no sources but I know something to be true?
|
| SYNTH |
21 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#SYNTH
|
| no one here thinks for themselves we have experts or consensus! |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#no one here thinks for themselves we have experts or consensus!
|
| Quotation overuse? Original Research? Please give your advice! |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Quotation overuse? Original Research? Please give your advice!
|
| Isn't obiter dictum a secondary source? |
31 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Isn't obiter dictum a secondary source?
|
| Is a summary within a book review a primary or a secondary source? |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is a summary within a book review a primary or a secondary source?
|
| Contradiction |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Contradiction
|
| "Directly related to the topic of the article" does not mean explicitly referring to it |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Directly related to the topic of the article" does not mean explicitly referring to it
|
| Affiliations of officeholders |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Affiliations of officeholders
|
| More out of curiosity: determining the real-world location of filming from landscape/panorama shown in shot |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#More out of curiosity: determining the real-world location of filming from landscape/panorama shown in shot
|
| Opinions needed at Dental dam talk page |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Opinions needed at Dental dam talk page
|
| adjudicate accusations of protocol violations |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#adjudicate accusations of protocol violations
|
| RfC about independent sources for academic notability |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#RfC about independent sources for academic notability
|
| TERF |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#TERF
|
| Is the/Are the CIA (and other "Intelligence" agencies) a Primary source, or a Secondary source? |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is the/Are the CIA (and other "Intelligence" agencies) a Primary source, or a Secondary source?
|
| Another consideration of if this is SYNTH |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Another consideration of if this is SYNTH
|
| Where does music fit in with all this? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Where does music fit in with all this?
|
| If original experience contradicts, will a source stay or be removed? |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#If original experience contradicts, will a source stay or be removed?
|
| RfC: terrorist incidents list criteria |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#RfC: terrorist incidents list criteria
|
| Contributing Research Findings |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Contributing Research Findings
|
| Secondary sources |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Secondary sources
|
| RfC on content concerning illegal fetal tissue dealers |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#RfC on content concerning illegal fetal tissue dealers
|
| Are interviews considered secondary sources... redux |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Are interviews considered secondary sources... redux
|
| Proposed change to WP:PRIMARY |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Proposed change to WP:PRIMARY
|
| OR and talk page discussions |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#OR and talk page discussions
|
| Wikipedia user is also an author, references own work |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Wikipedia user is also an author, references own work
|
| What is considered an interpretation of primary sources in history related article? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#What is considered an interpretation of primary sources in history related article?
|
| Yearbooks - primary or secondary? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Yearbooks - primary or secondary?
|
| photo |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#photo
|
| Why no original research? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Why no original research?
|
| Why no original research? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Why no original research? 2
|
| Move discussion in progress |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Move discussion in progress
|
| Verifiability |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Verifiability
|
| This policy guarantees a pro-mass media bias |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#This policy guarantees a pro-mass media bias
|
| Does assembling individual datapoints into a chart (where no such chart is known to exist) constitute OR? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Does assembling individual datapoints into a chart (where no such chart is known to exist) constitute OR?
|
| Road lengths |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Road lengths
|
| FOIA Request |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#FOIA Request
|
| RFC related to this policy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#RFC related to this policy
|
| Some controversy |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Some controversy
|
| intro |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#intro
|
| Misrepresenting sources |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Misrepresenting sources
|
| Cultural Biases re. No OR |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Cultural Biases re. No OR
|
| Nonfiction synopsis based on primary source |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Nonfiction synopsis based on primary source
|
| Mathematics and original research |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Mathematics and original research
|
| Original Research and Lists |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Original Research and Lists
|
| do verifiable observations count? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#do verifiable observations count?
|
| Is it really SYNTH to use cites as examples of a statement? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is it really SYNTH to use cites as examples of a statement?
|
| Extend PSTS to ensure topic relevance |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Extend PSTS to ensure topic relevance
|
| I know it's original research but since no one's ever done it before, does it count as reliable? |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#I know it's original research but since no one's ever done it before, does it count as reliable?
|
| "Sources published before an event shouldn't be used to provide background information for an article about the event" |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Sources published before an event shouldn't be used to provide background information for an article about the event"
|
| "Those sources which do not directly cover the topic of the article should be replaced with those that do." |
17 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Those sources which do not directly cover the topic of the article should be replaced with those that do."
|
| Texts that establish law |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Texts that establish law
|
| Devendra kula velalar |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Devendra kula velalar
|
| "Sources can contain both primary and secondary source material for the same statement." |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Sources can contain both primary and secondary source material for the same statement."
|
| OR and SYNTH concerns at The Infinity Gauntlet |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#OR and SYNTH concerns at The Infinity Gauntlet
|
| RFC |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#RFC
|
| "ancillary article", meaning? |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"ancillary article", meaning?
|
| Statistics |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Statistics
|
| Original Research in science |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Original Research in science
|
| Books published by university presses |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Books published by university presses
|
| Calculation of dates. |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Calculation of dates.
|
| Source Based Research vs Original Research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Source Based Research vs Original Research
|
| WP:PRIMARY requires that primary sources are "reputably published." What does that mean? |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#WP:PRIMARY requires that primary sources are "reputably published." What does that mean?
|
| The link between WP:PRIMARY and WP:UNDUE weight |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#The link between WP:PRIMARY and WP:UNDUE weight
|
| Is this Wikipedia:Original Research ? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is this Wikipedia:Original Research ?
|
| Date of Revelation on Doctrine and Covenants 107:82-84 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Date of Revelation on Doctrine and Covenants 107:82-84
|
| Publisher website links and WP:PRIMARY |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Publisher website links and WP:PRIMARY
|
| Add time zone shift as example for routine caculation? |
34 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Add time zone shift as example for routine caculation?
|
| Synthesis and routine calculations |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Synthesis and routine calculations
|
| "Does not apply to talk pages" |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#"Does not apply to talk pages"
|
| Harassment from User talk:Binksternet |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Harassment from User talk:Binksternet
|
| Original publisher web links/retailers |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Original publisher web links/retailers
|
| SYNTH and summary table in US presidential rankings |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#SYNTH and summary table in US presidential rankings
|
| Issues relating to 'Using sources' |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Issues relating to 'Using sources'
|
| Mathematical inference and proof |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Mathematical inference and proof
|
| Synthesis |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Synthesis
|
| Historical currency conversion |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Historical currency conversion
|
| A Computer-generated image reached by consensus |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#A Computer-generated image reached by consensus
|
| When is an academic study considered primary, secondary or both? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#When is an academic study considered primary, secondary or both?
|
| Seemingly widespread and contradictory views about what primary and secondary sources are |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Seemingly widespread and contradictory views about what primary and secondary sources are
|
| FYI |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#FYI
|
| Is the goal to avoid the wikipedia contributor's novel interpretation or the primary sources' novel interpretation? |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#Is the goal to avoid the wikipedia contributor's novel interpretation or the primary sources' novel interpretation?
|
| OR on Talk pages, etc. |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#OR on Talk pages, etc.
|
| Can we have an article on some topic if no RS exists that defines it? |
27 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Can we have an article on some topic if no RS exists that defines it?
|
| Birthdate and Birthplace for BIO |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Birthdate and Birthplace for BIO
|
| SYNTH review please |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 62#SYNTH review please
|
| Primary, secondary and tertiary sources |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
|
| Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability § Verifiability of animal habitat maps |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability § Verifiability of animal habitat maps
|
| "Anywhere in the world, in any language" and other matters with the new table |
141 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#"Anywhere in the world, in any language" and other matters with the new table
|
| Should we work to reduce overlap / duplication between WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability ? |
20 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Should we work to reduce overlap / duplication between WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability ?
|
| Paraphrasing |
54 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Paraphrasing
|
| An apparent contradiction |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#An apparent contradiction
|
| For-profit higher education in the United States |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#For-profit higher education in the United States
|
| Lengthy summaries of court decisions |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Lengthy summaries of court decisions
|
| P/S/T sources; P/S/T sourcing; or P/S/T source materials, etc. |
22 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#P/S/T sources; P/S/T sourcing; or P/S/T source materials, etc.
|
| Assistance requested with SYNTH issue in country demographic articles |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Assistance requested with SYNTH issue in country demographic articles
|
| Can your text messages be used to justify a persons accused state of mind when being accused of sending said messages where of a violent nature? |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Can your text messages be used to justify a persons accused state of mind when being accused of sending said messages where of a violent nature?
|
| Fictional characters and original research |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Fictional characters and original research
|
| Simple synthesis is not original research |
91 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Simple synthesis is not original research
|
| Lexical cohesion in sources |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Lexical cohesion in sources
|
| Community research should be encouraged! Community research would unleash the potential of humanity! |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Community research should be encouraged! Community research would unleash the potential of humanity!
|
| i'm n00b. what of the case of simple calculations that any wikipedia reader can verify for themselves? |
9 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#i'm n00b. what of the case of simple calculations that any wikipedia reader can verify for themselves?
|
| Avoiding original research in determining superlatives |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Avoiding original research in determining superlatives
|
| Let's finally split PSTS to its own page |
39 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Let's finally split PSTS to its own page
|
| Credit tally |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Credit tally
|
| directly related to the topic of the article |
40 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#directly related to the topic of the article
|
| Talk:Trump |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Talk:Trump
|
| "Secondary sources" extremely questionable! |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#"Secondary sources" extremely questionable!
|
| Maps, OR, and SYNTHESIS |
60 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 63#Maps, OR, and SYNTHESIS
|
| RFC plans |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#RFC plans
|
| Turning one policy page into two policy pages |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Turning one policy page into two policy pages
|
| Returning the key point |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Returning the key point
|
| Cut the second sentence |
115 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Cut the second sentence
|
| Implicit synthesis |
50 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Implicit synthesis
|
| Theoretical question on if someone published their own secondary source |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Theoretical question on if someone published their own secondary source
|
| RFC on clarification to this proposal |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#RFC on clarification to this proposal
|
| Recent addition - maps, charts, etc. |
79 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Recent addition - maps, charts, etc.
|
| RfC on clarification of WP:CALC for costliest tornadoes |
32 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#RfC on clarification of WP:CALC for costliest tornadoes
|
| Is constructing lists from multiple unrelated sources WP:OR? |
19 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Is constructing lists from multiple unrelated sources WP:OR?
|
| Social media account |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Social media account
|
| Translation (?) of song lyrics |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Translation (?) of song lyrics
|
| Misunderstanding |
13 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Misunderstanding
|
| Quibbles about the definition of primary sources |
16 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Quibbles about the definition of primary sources
|
| 14 July Community Call |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#14 July Community Call
|
| uhh |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#uhh
|
| Comparisons of statistics |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Comparisons of statistics
|
| Poor grammar |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Poor grammar
|
| Discussion at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#RfC: Deprecating WP:NOTDIR |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Discussion at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#RfC: Deprecating WP:NOTDIR
|
| Would WP:CALC apply to a tornado's forward speed? |
12 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Would WP:CALC apply to a tornado's forward speed?
|
| WP:MEDRS link |
3 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#WP:MEDRS link
|
| Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2023 |
2 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2023
|
| Text/prose |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Text/prose
|
| What if primary source contradicts secondary source? |
24 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#What if primary source contradicts secondary source?
|
| Specifying useful and proper uses of primary sources and reference works |
23 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Specifying useful and proper uses of primary sources and reference works
|
| Explicit and implicit synthesis examples. |
11 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Explicit and implicit synthesis examples.
|
| When will Wikipedia start allowing original research? |
7 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#When will Wikipedia start allowing original research?
|
| Input requested |
10 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 64#Input requested
|
| Is this original research (kinship)? |
5 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#Is this original research (kinship)?
|
| OR/V/BLP dispute about pronunciation keys in lead sentences |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#OR/V/BLP dispute about pronunciation keys in lead sentences
|
| WP:SECONDARY LINKBOX and the AEIS shortcut |
8 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#WP:SECONDARY LINKBOX and the AEIS shortcut
|
| Book, Film, and Play Synopses |
4 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#Book, Film, and Play Synopses
|
| Using OR to omit information |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#Using OR to omit information
|
| Reverted edit of 3 respected sources that confirm the subject of the article was a terrorist. |
6 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#Reverted edit of 3 respected sources that confirm the subject of the article was a terrorist.
|
| Feedback requested on whether usage examples require sources |
1 |
Wikipedia talk:No original research#Feedback requested on whether usage examples require sources
|
