Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Archive index binary prefixes

edit; Binary prefix archives
	0 Old discussion 0.1 Non-base ten numbers; 0.2 Unit Disagreement, MiB vs. MB; ; 1 Archive B1 1.1 Binary prefixes; ; 2 Archive B2 2.1 Binary Prefixes (again); 2.2 Binary prefixes vs Historical accuracy; 2.3 Two questions from sports article; ; 3 Archive B3 3.1 Binary prefixes vs JEDEC Standard[broken anchor]; ; 4 Archive B4 4.1 Two quick notes[broken anchor]; ; 5 Archive B5 5.1 Pulling it together[broken anchor]; ; 6 Archive B6 6.1 Binary Prefixes-A compromise?[broken anchor]; ; 7 Archive B7 7.1 I'm done with the binary prefixes debate; 7.2 Time for a third party; 7.3 Prefix K/M/G used in binary sense is not an SI prefix; 7.4 Kilos and kibis; ; 8 Archive B8 8.1 Proposed new guideline for binary prefixes; 8.2 Actual comments about the proposal; 8.3 Addendum; 8.4 Enough of this; ; 9 Archive B9 9.1 Mediation; 9.2 Mischaracterization by Crotalus; 9.3 About the current wording; 9.4 Backup of Sarenne's user Contributions; ; 10 Archive B10 10.1 Merging computer unit articles; 10.2 Going to run some experiments; 10.3 Proposal; 10.4 Binary prefixes: A challenge; 10.5 Please move the dominant topic to its own page elsewhere; ; 11 Archive B11 11.1 What constitutes "consensus" on the Manual of Style?; 11.2 Consensus ?; ; 12 Archive B12 12.1 JEDEC finally responds; 12.2 Suggestion to follow the convention used by the first author; 12.3 More systematic changes; 12.4 Template with CSS proposition (withdrawn, css/content issue); ; 13 Archive B13 13.1 Template for byte quantities; 13.2 Call it curiosity; 13.3 Different binary template; ;

Learn more about this page

Add topic