Wikipedia talk:Lamest edit wars

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:Lamest edit wars/Wording)
Latest comment: 15 hours ago by Ltbdl in topic Should Awareness be added?
WikiProject iconDepartment of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
BottomThis page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

Article interview inquiry

edit

Hi, I'm a journalist who's working on a story about this page. Would anyone who's active here be interested in answering some questions about it? Thanks in advance for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenLindbergh (talkcontribs)

Boops boops

edit

https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/3737501-empty

Revert warring an image caption until it's padlocked counts as lame, right?

--155.4.128.189 (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

that's hilarious. i'll have to add that sometime. ltbdl (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This feels straight out of Uncyclopedia POSSUM chowg (talk) 11:17 AM, December 18 2023 (PST)

question.

edit

i have a question: can i add this war? because it's SO LAME, lamest edit war i've seen, but it happened on another wiki...
also a pretty intense one. but really lame. if it happened here, i'd straight up add it. (forgot signature smh) What was the glider's apgcode? (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Which heading

edit

I read on ANI about a bunch of sock- and/or meat-puppets warring for months by removing information about chairs in sub-Saharan Africa at History of the chair. What heading of LEW would that fall under? QwertyForest (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should Awareness be added?

edit

I just found out about this ridiculous dispute, because switching two words broke Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy for a large number of articles, and there have been around FIFTY edits about this. I find this truly lame. Wilh3lmTalk 17:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

that is incredible. thank you. ltbdl (talk) 02:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply