Wikipedia talk:Guidance on source reviewing at FAC
Essays Low‑impact | ||||||||||
|
Publisher location edit
"Publisher location and, where possible, ISBN are usually added, although not specifically stipulated in MoS" - is adding the location still usual, I wonder? Certainly it's common. I don't like doing it, not least because so many books (especially the sort I use, on art) are simultaneously published, usually in the US & UK, but also other combinations. The ISBN will give you that anyway. Looking at FAC now, I see many that do, but eg Philip I Philadelphus doesn't. Oh, well, maybe it is still usual. Johnbod (talk) 02:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not keen on adding location either, and WP:CITEHOW doesn't require it, but it's standard practice so we're probably stuck with it. SarahSV (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Help section edit
Hi Brian, I'm replying here to your note on my talk to keep everything together. You asked who should be listed in the Help section. I was thinking of adding that reviewers can seek advice on WT:FAC, rather than listing individuals. SarahSV (talk) 01:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- I like this idea as many helpful reviewers watch that page. It also allows the helpful to have a life outside of helping. Fifelfoo (talk) 07:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed and thanks. Brianboulton (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)