Wikipedia talk:Featured sound criteria
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tony1 in topic Who agreed to these wholesale changes?
| This is the talk page of the Featured sound criteria, a part of the Featured sounds process. In order to ensure that all comments and questions are seen and responded to, all Featured sounds pages use the same talk page, Wikipedia talk:Featured sound candidates. Please click on that link and post your comment or question there. Thank you. |
Posts from before the one talk page policy was implemented can be found at the archive for this page.
Who agreed to these wholesale changes? edit
I fundamentally disagree with some of the changes made on 14 and 15 May, just two weeks ago. Where was this discussed? Where has "exemplifies our very best work" gone? Who invented "A sound's encyclopedic value is given priority over its artistic value."?
All of the changes (not to mention the wording) needs to be discussed. Tony (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
So let me get this right: "because the performer is notable", a file passes the notability test? Great performers can play crappily. And they can play crappy music. This is weird. Tony (talk) 10:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)