Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Strom Thurmond filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957/archive1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AviationFreak in topic Archived?

Archived? edit

Hi @Buidhe: I see that you have just archived the nomination ([1]), when the nominator has just responded (and maybe fixed) all the issues raised by Hog Farm. I wonder, at this point, is it necessary to archive? Because I am willing to do spot-checks (something I had not done in my source review, and did specify that) for all the sources, if you coordinators want that. Again, I respect your decision, and if you feel it is necessary to archive, I'm sorry. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kavyansh, I really appreciate your willingness to help with this nomination. I was thinking it might take a long time to check the citations, but if you think it can be resolved quickly I'm happy to unarchive. (t · c) buidhe 05:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Buidhe: I think I can in a day or two. The article is relatively short, and all the book sources are available online (I guess). – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Detailed spot checks by Kavyansh edit

Moved from the FAC page (on 15:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC))

Strom Thurmond filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 —— Version reviewed
Key:

  — all good;   — clarification required;   — source does not support the text, or some parts of the text

# Name Page Article text Source link Source text Note(s) Status Replies from AviationFreak
1 Eisenhower Library "The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was designed to federally secure and protect the right of African Americans to vote," [1] "The result was the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the first civil rights legislation ... and empowered federal prosecutors to obtain court injunctions against interference with the right to vote"
  • Our article implies that the Act was specifically designed for African Americans, while the source just states that it "[obtained] court injunctions against interference with the right to vote"
 (now  )
  • Moved FN1 to end of sentence alongside FN2 instead of end of claim. FN2 states that the law was "the first significant measure to address African-American civil rights since 1875" and "authorized the U.S. Attorney General to seek federal court injunctions to protect the voting rights of African Americans."
2 House of Representatives "and was supported by the NAACP alongside the Eisenhower administration." [2] "... the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Propelled by advocacy groups like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, as well as the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration, ..."  
3 NARA "While the Fifteenth Amendment had federally guaranteed men of all races the right to vote in 1870, state laws, poll taxes, and other institutions prevented African Americans from voting." [3] "The Fifteenth Amendment (ratified in 1870) extended voting rights to men of all races. However, this amendment was not enough because African Americans were still denied the right to vote by state constitutions and laws, poll taxes, literacy tests, the “grandfather clause,” and outright intimidation."
  • Suggesting to remove "federally". I know it is factually correct, but the source does not state it.
 (now  )
4 Iowa Dept. of Culture "The Civil Rights Act of 1957 aimed to protect African Americans' voting rights by establishing a Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice and a U.S. Civil Rights Commission." [4] "This legislation established a Commission on Civil Rights to investigate civil rights violations and also established a Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 authorized the prosecution for those who violated the right to vote for United States citizens."  
5 Politico " In the Senate, the bill was supported by both Republicans and Democrats, though most Democrats from Southern states opposed the bill." [5] "While the bill alienated and angered Southern Democrats, they lifted their blockade after it became apparent that the measure would do little, if anything, to end Jim Crow practices in the South."
  • I am not sure if that is enough to state that "the bill was supported by both Republicans and Democrats"
 (now  )
  • Removed; article now states "In the Senate, many Democrats from Southern states opposed the bill."
6 Fox News "Strom Thurmond remarked that the civil rights bill constituted a "cruel and unusual punishment"," [6] "The South Carolina (search) senator [Strom Thurmond], then a Democrat, opened his one-man filibuster on Aug. 28, 1957, at 8:54 p.m. against the bill, which he said was unconstitutional and "cruel and unusual punishment.""  
"Thurmond took daily steam baths leading up to the filibuster in order to draw fluids out of his body, thus dehydrating himself and allowing himself to absorb fluids for a longer period of time during the filibuster" "Thurmond also had visited the Senate steam room to get liquids out of his body so that if he drank during the filibuster, he would not have to go to the bathroom."
  • Ref#14 also
 
"He also sucked on throat lozenges and malted milk tablets to keep himself from getting hoarse." "The senator, armed with throat lozenges and malted milk tablets, recited the voting rights laws of every state to show adequate protection existed."
  • Ref#17 also
  • I don't think this or Ref#17 cites: "to keep himself from getting hoarse"? Is that an assumption?
 (now  )
  • This was an assumption - Removed "to keep himself from getting hoarse."
7 Lachicotte (1996) 133 "and stated that he hoped to "educate the country" by means of an extended speech against the legislation." [7] "Nevertheless, Senator Thurmond held to his decision "to educate the country" by means of a comprehensive speech on the subject of the civil rights bill."  
8 United States Senate "Senate rules allow for virtually unlimited debate on a bill, and a filibuster is a means of using these rules to prevent a bill's passage by speaking for as long as possible." [8] "Whether praised as the protector of political minorities from the tyranny of the majority, or attacked as a tool of partisan obstruction, the right of unlimited debate in the Senate, including the filibuster, has been a key component of the Senate’s unique role in the American political system. The tactic of using long speeches to delay action on legislation appeared in the very first session of the Senate"  
"A filibuster can also be ended by a cloture vote, which requires a certain percentage of senators to agree that a speech should be ended. At the time of Thurmond's speech, the threshold for cloture was a two-thirds majority. Thurmond holds the record for the longest solo filibuster, but longer filibusters have been carried out by groups of tag-teaming senators." "The earliest filibusters also led to the first demands for what we now call “cloture,” a method for ending debate and bringing a question to a vote ... In 1917, with frustration mounting and at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, senators adopted a rule (Senate Rule 22) that allowed the Senate to invoke cloture and limit debate with a two-thirds majority vote ... In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds of senators voting to three-fifths ... The record for the longest individual speech goes to South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, who filibustered for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957."  
"Thurmond concluded his filibuster after 24 hours and 18 minutes at 9:12 p.m. on August 29, making it the longest filibuster ever conducted in the Senate to date." "The record for the longest individual speech goes to South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, who filibustered for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957."
  • Also Ref#24
 
9 Cohodas (1993) 294–296 "The rules at the time of Thurmond's filibuster prevented senators from leaving the chamber or sitting down while speaking, as doing so would end their speech." [9] "Leaving the chamber even for the bathroom would have meant giving up the floor ... Just before 1:00 p.m. Thurmond nearly lost the floor when he sat down while answering a question from William Danger of North Dakota "
  • None of the incidents imply of state that it was violation of senate rules.
 (still  )
  • The forfeiture of the floor upon leaving or sitting down is per the Senate's rules - Does this need to be reworded?
    • Is there any source which supports this? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • The Senate rules are the basis on which actions in the Senate are governed. The source says leaving the floor means forfeiting the speech - What else would cause that besides the Senate rules? AviationFreak💬 03:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
10 Crespino (2012) 113 "Thurmond's filibuster was primarily focused on a specific provision in the civil rights bill that focused on minor voting rights contempt cases. The provision allowed these cases to be tried by a judge without a jury present, but allowed a second trial by jury if penalties in the first trial exceeded 45 days' imprisonment or $300 in fines. This arrangement had been decided through a compromise between Republicans and Democrats, though according to historian Joseph Crespino it had very little practical impact since most judges would opt not to try a case without a jury if doing so made a second trial more likely." [10] "Howard Smith's recalcitrance gave House Republicans an opening. On August 21 the Republicans laid out a compromise plan that allowed judges to try minor contempt cases without a jury, but it guaranteed a new trial, by jury, if the penalty imposed was more than $300 or forty-five days in prison. This was a face-saving measure by Martin and the Republicans. It was practically meaningless since few judges would hear a case without a jury as doing so would make it likely that the case would have to be tried twice. It was enough, however, to bring leadership from both parties in both houses together. Thurmond denounced the compromise, calling the jury trial guarantee "a matter of principle, not a matter of degree.""
  • We are indirectly assuming that "few judges would hear a case without a jury" means that most would not. Slight misinterpretation of sources:
    • The source states: "It was practically meaningless since few judges would hear a case without a jury when doing so would make it likely that the case would have to be tried twice."
    • Our article states: " though according to historian Joseph Crespino it had very little practical impact since most judges would opt not to try a case without a jury if doing so made a second trial more likely."
 (now  )
  • Reworded article to state "according to historian Joseph Crespino it had very little practical impact since many judges would not hear a case without a jury if doing so made a second trial more likely."
11 Lachicotte (1966) 131 "Thurmond and other Southern senators saw the provision as a violation of the defendant's right to a trial by jury, which is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution" [11] "The junior South Carolina Senator [Thurmond] became disturbed that the compromise jury trial provision was not getting the attention of the American public ... The southern senators had based the best part of their case against the bill on the question of the right of trial by jury in criminal court contempt cases arising under the legislation ... This part of the bill, according to Thurmond, his southern colleagues and others, was a violation of the right of trial by jury as guaranteed to every citizen in Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution of the United States and also in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution."
  • Perfect
 
12 NPR "Thurmond was a fairly well-known figure in American politics prior to his senatorship: He was elected as governor of South Carolina in 1946, helped to found the States' Rights Democratic Party after a walkout over civil rights at the 1948 Democratic National Convention, and ran against Harry S. Truman and Thomas E. Dewey as the new party's candidate in the 1948 presidential election. Thurmond garnered more than one million votes and won four states in this third-party presidential bid. Six years later, Thurmond ran as a Democrat and was elected to the Senate as the junior senator from South Carolina. He was not on the ticket in this election and was elected in a write-in campaign." [12] "Thurmond first gained national prominence in 1948. That's when white southern Democrats left their party's national convention over the civil rights plank that northern Democrats put in the platform. At a breakaway convention held a week later in Alabama, under the banner of the States' Rights Democratic Party, the rebellious "Dixiecrats" chose Thurmond, then South Carolina's governor, as their presidential nominee. Thurmond told them there were not enough troops in the Army to force white southerners to end segregation and allow what he called "the Negro race" into theaters, swimming pools, homes and churches. In the 1948 presidential election, Thurmond won more than a million votes and carried four southern states ... In 1954, the year the Supreme Court banned segregated schools, Thurmond was elected to the Senate as a write-in candidate. There, Welna says, Thurmond "kept up the losing battle to preserve segregation, setting a Senate record in 1957 by filibustering a civil rights bill with a floor speech that lasted more than 24 hours.""
  • Missing mentions for the following facts in the source:
    • Fairly well known prior to his senator-ship.
    • Governor of South Caroline in 1946
    • Harry S. Truman
    • Thomas E. Dewey
    • Not on Democratic ticket in 1954
 (now  )
  • Replaced "fairly well-known" with "had been significantly involved in politics", which I think is a fair given the following examples. Let me know if this ought to be changed.
  • Removed year of governorship election
  • For Truman & Dewey: Added This source from a history prof at UVA that says "Truman had confounded the pundits. He won 49.5 percent of the vote to Dewey's 45.1 percent; 303 electoral college votes to 189 for Dewey. Thurmond and Wallace trailed miserably, each with 2.4 percent of the vote, although Thurmond took four southern states and their 39 electoral votes."
  • The source states that Thurmond was a write-in candidate, which implies not being on the ticket. Does this need to be explicitly stated in the source?
    • Not exactly verified, this needs to be in the source. Its unfortunate, but you should probably remove this detail. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • Removed; Kept the fact that it was a write-in campaign since the source verifies that. AviationFreak💬 03:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
"The bill passed two hours after Thurmond finished speaking," "There, Welna says, Thurmond "kept up the losing battle to preserve segregation, setting a Senate record in 1957 by filibustering a civil rights bill with a floor speech that lasted more than 24 hours.""
  • No mention of two hours at all
 (now  )
  • Cited to FN13, which states "At 8:54 p.m. on Aug. 28, 1957, he started talking, and he did not stop until 9:12 p.m. the next day. Two hours later, the Senate passed the first civil rights bill since 1875."
13 The New York Times "Thurmond's political candidacies were largely based on his opposition to racial integration" [13] "His opposition to integration, which he often attributed to Communism, was the hallmark of his career in Washington until the 1970's"
  • Maybe okay
 
14 Bass & Thompson (2005) 169 "An agreement among the Southern senators to not stage an organized filibuster had been reached in Georgia Senator Richard Russell's office on August 24, four days prior to Thurmond's speech." [14] "... but at a caucus in Russel's office on August 24, agreement was reached that there would be no organised filibuster"
  • Source does not state that that particular caucus was of Southern senators. Neither that Russel was senator from Georgia.
  • Also, the source does not state that it was 4 days ago, but that won't be a major issue with me. We have both Aug 24 as date of caucus, and Aug 28 as date of filibuster cited.
 (now  )
  • Re-refed to Lachicotte p. 130, which states "At the final caucus of the southern senators in Senator Richard Russell's office on Saturday, August 24, 1957, with Senator Thurmond present, it was generally agreed that organized extended debate would not be held."
  • Also removed "Georgia" from Russell's introduction in the prose
"Thurmond took daily steam baths leading up to the filibuster in order to draw fluids out of his body, thus dehydrating himself and allowing himself to absorb fluids for a longer period of time during the filibuster." "... taking steam baths for several days to dehydrate his body so it could absorb liquids without his having to leave the Senate chamber for the bathroom—and loose his right to continue speaking"
  • Also Ref#6
 
15 Bass & Thompson (2005) 170 "Thurmond's departure from the senators' agreement was later criticized by party leaders including Russell and Herman Talmadge." [15] "Minutes after Thurmond sat down, his distant relative Talmadge accused him of "grandstanding". The next day, Russel coldly commented, "If I had taken a filibuster for personal aggrandizement, I would have forever reproached myself for being guilty of a form of treason against the South.""
  • Talmadge's first name not specified, but that is not a major issue, at-least for me.
 (still  )
"An aide had prepared a bucket in the Senate cloakroom for Thurmond to relieve himself if the need arose, but Thurmond did not end up using it" "Dent had arranged to have to have a bucket placed in the Aenate cloakroom in case the senator needed to relieve himself, an arrangement that would allow him to keep one foot inside the Senate chamber and thus not break the rules. Thurmond needed no such relief"
  • Was "Dent" his aide?
  • Also Ref#29
 (still  )
  • Dent was an aide, and is a recurring character throughout the book. Should I cite the page where he is introduced (p. 26) as well?
    • Maybe yes. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • Added p.26 to FN. Not used to citing multiple pages that aren't connected in a range, so if someone could check my work that would be excellent. AviationFreak💬 03:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
16 Library of Congress " Alaska and Hawaii were not yet admitted as states at the time of the filibuster." [16] "1959: Alaska and Hawaii admitted, respectively, as the 49th and 50th states of the Union."  
17 Cohodas (1993) 294 "The filibuster began at 8:54 p.m. on August 28, 1957 with a reading of the election laws of each of the 48 states in alphabetical order" [17] "At 8:45 p.m. on August 28 he went out onto the Senate floor; he began talking at 8:54 p.m. ... The he read aloud the election statues of every state in order to show why federal voting laws were unnecessary"
  • "in order" does not imply " in alphabetical order". It can be in order of their admission to the Union. Moreover, I think it is an unnecessary detail.
 (now  )
"The Senate chamber gallery, filled with hundreds of spectators at the beginning of the filibuster, dwindled to just NAACP lobbyist Clarence Mitchell Jr. and Thurmond's wife Jean at points during the early morning hours." "Jean went up to the third floor of the Senate, to sit on the special gallery for senator's family, where she would stay the entire night. Nearby was the NAACP's chief lobbyist, Clarence Mitchell"
  • Also Ref#20
  • Does not support that (1) Mitchell was in the early morning hours (2) There were "hundreds of spectators at the beginning of the filibuster"
  • Even Ref#20 doesn't support above things?
 (now  ) Added p. 133 to the Ref#20 FN, which states:
  • "As the wee, pre-dawn hours came on, the Senate chamber presented a curious sight. The gallery was empty except for two people - the strangest combination imaginable. Mrs. Thurmond, a lonely frail figure in blue... in another section was Clarence Mitchell of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People"
  • "In the gallery were about two hundred spectators; conspicuous among them was Jean Thurmond, dressed simply in a navy knit suit."
"He also sucked on throat lozenges and malted milk tablets to keep himself from getting hoarse." "Before he left for the floor, Thurmond put a handful of malted milk tablets in one pocket and throat lozenges in another"
  • Also Ref#6
  • I don't think this or Ref#17 cites: "to keep himself from getting hoarse"? Is that an assumption?
 (now  )
  • This was an assumption - Removed "to keep himself from getting hoarse."
18 British Broadcasting Corporation "and continued with readings of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville, and George Washington's Farewell Address." [18] "Twenty-two years later, the veteran South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, set a record by filibustering a civil rights bill for 24 hours and 18 minutes, reading aloud the voting laws of each US state and quoting George Washington's farewell address in its entirety."
  • Also Ref#19
  • Rest supported by Ref#19; verified
 
"Thurmond's filibuster has been described by historian and biographer Joseph Crespino as "kind of a urological mystery"." "According to Thurmond's biographer Joseph Crespino, a history professor ... "It's a kind of urological mystery as to how he was able to do it," says Crespino."
  • Perfect
 
"It has also been rumored within the African American community that Thurmond used other methods to avoid leaving for the restroom. The Chicago Defender stated that Thurmond had worn "a contraption devised for long motoring trips" that allowed him to relieve himself on the stand, and longtime Capitol Hill staffer Bertie Bowman claimed in his memoir that Thurmond had been fitted with a catheter." "An African American Capitol employee named Bertie Bowman claimed in his memoirs that the senator had, in fact, been fitted with a catheter tube"
  • Also Ref#28
  • Is the Rest supported by Ref#28?
 (now  )
  • Yes; Ref#28: "A rival account, which white journalists either ignored or were unaware of, circulated in the African American community. The Chicago Defender reported that Thurmond had actually been fitted 'with a contraption devised for long motoring trips.' A memoir published by Bertie Bowman, a native South Carolinian and longtime African American employee on Capitol Hill, seems to confirm this..."
19 The Washington Post "and continued with readings of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville, and George Washington's Farewell Address." [19] "First, he said, the bill was unnecessary because every state in the union already had laws protecting voting rights. To prove this, he then read aloud every single states’ voting rights laws – all 48 of them, starting with Alabama. (Alaska and Hawaii were not yet states.) Then he read the federal code, a few Supreme Court opinions and from Alexis de Tocqueville’s “Democracy in America.” Claims he read the phone book are not supported by the Congressional Record."
  • Also Ref#18
  • Rest supported by Ref#18; verified.
 
"The filibuster failed to prevent the passage of the bill, and further failed to change the vote whatsoever." "Within hours, the bill passed. Thurmond’s talkathon hadn’t swayed a single senator to change their vote."  
"While the filibuster did not use any "overtly racist language" according to The Washington Post, it has been described both contemporaneously and in modern sources as such because the bill Thurmond filibustered against protected the right of African Americans to vote." "He used no overtly racist language while on the floor but falsely claimed that African Americans in the South who wanted to vote could do so unhindered, and he employed the old Confederate feint that he was simply acting to support states’ rights."
  • Not sure where "described both contemporaneously" is. Because The Washington Post is a modern source.
 (now  )
  • Removed "both contemporaneously and in modern sources"
20 Lachicotte (1966) 134 "The Senate chamber gallery, filled with hundreds of spectators at the beginning of the filibuster, dwindled to just NAACP lobbyist Clarence Mitchell Jr. and Thurmond's wife Jean at points during the early morning hours." [20] "The gallery was empty except for two people—the strangest combination imaginable. Mrs. Thurmond, a lonely frail figure in blue, still sat in the family section. Not far away in another section was Clarence Mitchell of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People"
  • Also Ref#17
  • Does not support that (1) Mitchell was in the early morning hours (2) There were "hundreds of spectators at the beginning of the filibuster"
  • Even Ref#17 doesn't support above things?
 (now  ) Added p. 133 to the Ref#20 FN, which states:
  • "As the wee, pre-dawn hours came on, the Senate chamber presented a curious sight. The gallery was empty except for two people - the strangest combination imaginable. Mrs. Thurmond, a lonely frail figure in blue... in another section was Clarence Mitchell of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People"
  • "In the gallery were about two hundred spectators; conspicuous among them was Jean Thurmond, dressed simply in a navy knit suit."
"Teams of Congressional stenographers worked together to record the speech for the Congressional Record, which ultimately consumed 96 pages in the Record and cost taxpayers over $7,000 in printing costs ($65,000 in 2020 dollars)." "Directly in front, teams of stenographer took turns scribbling away for the Congressional Record and posterity every monotoned word from the southern senator at the rear of the chamber"
  • Also Ref#21
  • Rest supported by Ref#21; verified.
  • "($65,000 in 2020 dollars)" does not require citation; from a template.
 
21 Crespino (2012) 115 "On the morning of the 29th, Thurmond's voice dropped to a mumble and his tone became increasingly monotonous. Republican leader William Knowland from California requested around midday that Thurmond speak up so he could be sure no motions were being made, but Thurmond responded by suggesting that the senator move closer. Knowland remained where he was." [21] "By midday Thursday, his voice had become so faint that the California senator William Knowland, sitting on the other side of the chamber, asked him to speak up. Thurmond requested that the senator move closer. Knowland declined, saying ..."
  • Also Ref#22
 
"Teams of Congressional stenographers worked together to record the speech for the Congressional Record, which ultimately consumed 96 pages in the Record and cost taxpayers over $7,000 in printing costs ($65,000 in 2020 dollars)." "The speech filled ninety-six pages of the Congressional Record with estimated printing consts running $7,776"
  • Also Ref#20
  • Rest supported by Ref#20; verified
 
"During the filibuster, Thurmond sustained himself on diced pieces of pumpernickel bread and small pieces of cooked hamburger." "... Jean had cooked at home and brought over in tinfoil with a hunk of pumpernickel bread"
  • Not able to find hamburger.
 (now  )
  • "During the course of his speech Thurmond nibbled on cold ground sirloin steak that Jean had cooked at home and brought over in tinfoil with a hunk of pumpernickel bread."
  • I interpreted "ground sirloin steak" as hamburger (American term for ground beef).
"These [those who criticized Thurmond] senators had received numerous telegrams during Thurmond's speech encouraging them to assist Thurmond in his filibuster by relieving him, while Thurmond's staff received correspondence from hundreds of Southerners congratulating and encouraging him." "All of the other southern senators had received sulfurous telegrams through the night urging them to join Thurmond's fight. ...
  • Also Ref#34
  • Rest verified to Ref#34; verefied.
 
22 Cohodas (1993) 296 "On the morning of the 29th, Thurmond's voice dropped to a mumble and his tone became increasingly monotonous. Republican leader William Knowland from California requested around midday that Thurmond speak up so he could be sure no motions were being made, but Thurmond responded by suggesting that the senator move closer. Knowland remained where he was." [22] "Once, when the senator's drawl had slid into a barely audible mumble, Knowland asked him to speak up. Thurmond suggested Knowland move a little closer to the rear of the chamber, but the Californian replied that he was "well satisfied" with his seat"
  • Also Ref#21
 
"Thurmond's health had become an item of concern by the evening of the 29th among his aides and the Senate doctor George W. Calver, who stated "I'll take him off myself" if senatorial staff could not convince Thurmond to end his speech." "By late afternoon, Dent was deeply concerned about Thurmond's health. ... Dent went back to the floor with explicit directions from the physician: "You tell him to get off his feet or I'm going to take him off his feet"
  • Also Ref#30
  • Doctor's name supported by Ref#30; verified.
  • The direct quotation has error (maybe)
 (now  ) Ref#30:
  • "If the staff could not stop the legislator, 'I'll take him off the floor myself', Dr. Calver stated firmly." Based on the conflicting sources, removed direct quotation in favor of "threatened to personally remove him from the floor"
"Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois brought Thurmond a pitcher of orange juice as noon approached on the 29th, but a staffer quickly put it out of his reach after Thurmond had drunk a glass." "Senator Paul Douglas, a Democrat from Illinois, came to the floor with a large pitcher of orange juice, poured a glass and gave it to Thurmond, who drank it with a gusto. Dent, realizing that too much liquid could force the senator to the rest room, quickly grabbed the pitcher and put it on the floor out of his reach."
  • Increase the page range from 296 to 296–297
 
23 Lachicotte (1966) 136 "At approximately 1 p.m. Thurmond yielded to allow for the swearing-in of William Proxmire, who was elected following the death of Joseph McCarthy, after which he resumed his speech. Thurmond was also allowed breaks throughout the day by other senators, including some in support of the bill, when they questioned him at length." [23] "A short break came at one o'clock to allow swearing-in of Senator William Proxmire of Wisconsin, newly elected to fill the deceased Senator Joseph McCarthy's unexpired term. Other breathers came during the course of the day when several colleagues engaged in prolonged questioning—"just to give the fellow a break," said some of them"  
24 Cohodas (1993) 296–297 "Thurmond concluded his filibuster after 24 hours and 18 minutes at 9:12 p.m. on August 29, making it the longest filibuster ever conducted in the Senate to date." [24], [25] Thurmond announced, "I now give up the floor." He left the chamber at 9:12 p.m., having broken the previous filibuster record of twenty-two hours and twenty-six minutes set by Senator Morse three years earlier"
  • Also Ref#8
  • Does not cite "24 hours and 18 minutes"
 (now  )
  • Ref#8: "The record for the longest individual speech goes to South Carolina's Strom Thurmond, who filibustered for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957."
25 The Washington Post "This surpassed the previous record set by Wayne Morse, who spoke against the Submerged Lands Act for 22 hours and 26 minutes in 1953." [26] "... Sen. Wayne Morse (D-Ore.) favorably compared Morse's 1953 filibuster opposing the Submerged Lands Act to Smith's valiant political drama on screen."
  • Also Ref#26 and Ref#27
  • Please mark "url-access=subscription"; I accessed this via ProQuest 2623205764
  • Rest supported by Ref#26 and Ref#27; verified, but:
  • None of the three source (#25, #26, #27) state "Submerged Lands Act"
 (now  )
  • I guess WaPo does a "N number of free articles per month" or something and I just haven't hit the paywall yet - I've marked it as subscription and done the same for the NYT and second WaPo sources.
  • "Submerged Lands Act" is in Ref#25, as you show in the "Source text" column.
    • That happens when you work continuously for 6 hours. Sorry. Verified. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
26 Byrd (1988) 148 "This surpassed the previous record set by Wayne Morse, who spoke against the Submerged Lands Act for 22 hours and 26 minutes in 1953." [27] " In 1953, Wayne Morse of Oregon set a new record for long-windedness in the Senate when he took the floor at 11:40 a.m. on Friday, April 24, and spoke until 10:06 a.m. Saturday, a total of twenty-two hours and twenty-six minutes. Morse opposed the pending offshore oil bill, ..."
  • Also Ref#25 and #27
  • Rest supported by Ref#25 and Ref#27; verified, but:
  • None of the three source (#25, #26, #27) state "Submerged Lands Act"
27 United States Senate "This surpassed the previous record set by Wayne Morse, who spoke against the Submerged Lands Act for 22 hours and 26 minutes in 1953." [28] "... he began a filibuster against Tidelands Oil legislation. When he concluded after 22 hours and 26 minutes, ..."
  • Also Ref#25 and #26
  • Rest supported by Ref#25 and Ref#26; verified, but:
  • None of the three source (#25, #26, #27) state "Submerged Lands Act"
28 Crespino (2012) 117 "It has also been rumored within the African American community that Thurmond used other methods to avoid leaving for the restroom. The Chicago Defender stated that Thurmond had worn "a contraption devised for long motoring trips" that allowed him to relieve himself on the stand, and longtime Capitol Hill staffer Bertie Bowman claimed in his memoir that Thurmond had been fitted with a catheter." [29]
  • Also Ref#18
 (now  )
"He [Crespino] further states that the filibuster was a way for Thurmond to uphold Southern ideas about white strength and endurance while also burnishing his personal image of masculinity and health."  (now  )
  • Ref#28: "The steam room explanation exaggerated Thurmond's physical prowess, and Thurmond's filibuster became a key event in his self-fashioned cult of masculinity... The steam room story burnished Thurmond's image of exceptional virility and masculine strength. Thurmond's obsession with good health and exercise was genuine, yet it was also a part of a cultivated political image. Thurmond had been eyeing Wayne Morse's filibuster record for some years, waiting for the right time to try to break it, intent on making a display of his physical strength and commitment to defending segregation. In doing so, he drew on deeply held racialized and gendered notions about how strong, responsible white men were supposed to behave."
29 NPR "Thurmond was allowed to leave for the restroom one time, approximately three hours into the filibuster. Senator Barry Goldwater quietly asked Thurmond how much longer he could hold off using the restroom, to which he replied, "about another hour"" [30] "And Time magazine wrote shortly after the filibuster that after Thurmond had been speaking for about three hours: "Arizona Republican Barry Goldwater approached Thurmond's desk, asked in a whisper how much longer Strom would last. Back came the answer: 'About another hour.'"  
"Goldwater asked Thurmond to yield the floor to him for a few minutes, and Thurmond was able to use the restroom while Goldwater made an insertion to the Congressional Record." "Goldwater asked that Thurmond temporarily yield the floor to him for an insertion in the Congressional Record. Thurmond happily consented — and used the few minute interim to head for the bathroom (for the only time during his speech)."  
"An aide had prepared a bucket in the Senate cloakroom for Thurmond to relieve himself if the need arose, but Thurmond did not end up using it." "If Thurmond had needed to relieve himself again, the Village Voice says his staff had come up with a solution: "Aides tried to avoid defeat by the toilet by setting up a bucket in the cloakroom where Thurmond could pee, keeping one foot on the Senate floor while doing so.""
  • Also Ref#15
 
30 Lachicotte (1966) 137 "Thurmond's health had become an item of concern by the evening of the 29th among his aides and the Senate doctor George W. Calver, who stated "I'll take him off myself" if senatorial staff could not convince Thurmond to end his speech." [31] "Dr. George W. Calver, Senate physician, entered the chamber between eight and nine o'clock. He told Thurmond staffmen the Senator would injure his health if he continued and to get him off the floor. If the staff could not stop the legislator, "I'll take him off myself. ..."
  • Also Ref#22
  • Please fix "Lachicotte (1996)" to "Lachicotte (1966)" in references.
  Fixed FN dates
31 Lachicotte (1966) 139 "and was signed into law by president Dwight D. Eisenhower less than two weeks later. The Civil Rights Act of 1957 was the first U.S. civil rights bill passed in 82 years." [32] "It was the first civil rights bill in eighty-two years ..."  (now  )
  • Added FN to Ref#2, which states "On September 9, 1957, President Eisenhower signed P.L. 85–315. The resulting law—the first significant measure to address African-American civil rights since 1875..."
  • Assuming WP:CALC allows for the basic math of August 29 to September 9 being less than 14 days.
32 Crespino (2012) 103 "In his biography of Thurmond titled Strom Thurmond's America, Crespino noted the impact of Thurmond's filibuster and partial authorship of the Southern Manifesto the previous year. He described these events as "[sealing] Thurmond's reputation as one of the South's last Confederates, a champion of white southerners' campaign of 'massive resistance'" to civil rights." [33]
  • "In his biography of Thurmond titled Strom Thurmond's America, Crespino — citation not required
  • "his initiation and authorship of the Southern Manifesto and his record in 1957 filibuster" cites the second part that these things are discussed
  • the quotation is present
 
33 Crespino (2012) 116 "Thurmond received significant criticism, even from Democrats including Talmadge, Russell, and the Southern Caucus as a whole. Talmadge referred to the speech as a form of grandstanding, and Russell denounced it as "personal political aggrandizement."" [34] Cannot find anything similar. Suggesting to cite this to Bass & Thompson (2005) p. 170.  (now  )
  • Ref#33, top of the page: "It was grandstanding of the worst sort, said Georgia's Talmadge, a distant cousin of Thurmond's who knew something about segregationist grandstanding. Richard Russell denounced Thurmond in one of the most impassioned speeches of his long Senate career, calling Thurmond's performance an act of "personal political aggrandizement" and touting the caucus's success in preserving segregation. "I would gladly part with what remains of this life," he said, "if this would guarantee the preservation of a civilization of two races of unmixed blood in the land I love.""
34 Cohodas (1993) 297 "These senators had received numerous telegrams during Thurmond's speech encouraging them to assist Thurmond in his filibuster by relieving him, while Thurmond's staff received correspondence from hundreds of Southerners congratulating and encouraging him." [35] "Indeed, Thurmond's office had received hundreds of calls and telegrams from southerners congratulating him on his stand"
  • Also Ref#21
  • Ref#21 already cites much of this, what was remaining is: "Thurmond's staff received correspondence from hundreds of Southerners congratulating and encouraging him"; which is verified here.
 
"Most Southern Democratic senators opposed the filibuster, despite its popularity among their constituents, because (as Richard Russell put it) the South had already secured a compromise in the bill which would be jeopardized by a filibuster and there was not enough support to prevent a cloture vote anyway." "The day after the vote Russel felt he had to offer the South an explanation of why he and other southerners did not join Thurmond's ... Frankly, Russel said, there were not enough votes to prevent choking of a full-fledged filibuster if they had tried one.  
35 United States Senate "In 1964, Thurmond participated in a second anti-civil rights filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1964." [36] "Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina echoed that sentiment, stating that “there are already ample laws on the statute books…if any qualified citizen does not vote today, the explanation must be either that he does not desire to vote or that he has not complained about voting.” ... Thurmond argued that the bill took away the rights of white southerners and bestowed them upon southern blacks: “The entire philosophy of those who support this legislation is impregnated with the basic idea that white southerners are not just second-class citizens, but apparently, should have no rights whatsoever.”"
  • Doesn't explicitly states that Thurmond directly participated in the filibuster.
 (now  )
  • Re-refed to this source from the National Constitution Center, which states "Committed to the filibuster effort were the powerful Senators Richard Russell, Strom Thurmond, Robert Byrd, William Fulbright, and Sam Ervin. Russell started the filibuster in late March 1964, and it would last for 60 working days in the Senate."
"The 1964 filibuster was carried out by a group of Southern senators and was only ended by a cloture vote" "Humphrey encouraged patience and appealed to the one man who could deliver the votes they needed, first to invoke cloture, and then for final passage of the bill: Everett Dirksen of Illinois, the Senate minority leader."
  • Willing to believe that this interprets that filibuster ended with a cloture vote (with help from Everett Dirksen)
 
36 United States Senate "Later that year [1964], he switched his affiliation to the Republican Party. [37] "J. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina
  • Independent Democrat, 1954-1956
  • Democrat, 1956-1964
  • Republican, 1964-2003"
  • Willing to accept that "September" is "Later that year"
 
37 United States Senate "Thurmond was repeatedly elected and served in the Senate for 48 years, retiring at age 100 as the oldest U.S. senator ever." [38] "He turned 100 years old in 2002, the only senator to reach that milestone while still in office"
  • Missing that "Thurmond was repeatedly elected and served in the Senate for 48 years"
 (now  )
  • From my reading of WP:CALC this is permissible, though let me know if it needs more concrete sourcing - He was first elected to the Senate in 1954 and retired in 2003 (both in Ref#37). 2003-1954=49, and then remove 1 year because it was only the third day of 2003 (in Ref#37 as well). There was also a period in 1956 that he was not a senator, but that was <1yr and is not mentioned by the Senate source.