Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/FC Barcelona/archive3
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Elcobbola in topic Resolved image issues
Resolved image issues
editOppose per criterion three; peer review image issues have not been resolved. Эlcobbola talk 19:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)- Could you be more specific. The cule image relies on a subjective criterion of enhancing understanding so I'd like other editors opinion about it. Sandman888(talk) 19:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Franco0001.PNG - "Source" says nothing about publication date (publication is not the same as creation). "Source" actually may have gotten this image from Wikipedia, so "PD" claim is circular and incorrect.- Source definitely not. Try now. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Publication sourced. Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Source definitely not. Try now. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Barcelona bombing.jpg - Brought to FAC with a disputed tag (!!!)- No-one gets the PD-Italy template, nominator/uploader/editor(s) unaware of several elements in copyright, could use expert help but no-one knows any experts. If un-published is source country = country in which it was created? Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Closed as keep. Sandman888 (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image removed. Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Closed as keep. Sandman888 (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- No-one gets the PD-Italy template, nominator/uploader/editor(s) unaware of several elements in copyright, could use expert help but no-one knows any experts. If un-published is source country = country in which it was created? Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Culers.jpg - Fails NFCC#1. "The origin of the nickname culé for a Barcelona supporter, is derived from the Catalan cul (English: arse), as the spectators at the first stadium, Camp de la Indústria, sat with their culs over the stand" is free prose and conveys the understanding perfectly well. Alternatively, both posteriors and low walls still exist; a free alternative could be taken as an example of the practice that precipitated the name. Now moot, but there is also no detailed and specific rationale/purpose (NFCC#10C).- But those would not be supporters. Sound crazy IMO. Oh away it goes. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image removed. Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- But those would not be supporters. Sound crazy IMO. Oh away it goes. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:FCB second crest.jpg - Purpose is "The image is used to identify the organization FC Barcelona". File:FCB.svg does that. NFCC#3A - "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." No articulated significant contribution to reader understanding (NFCC#8).Эlcobbola talk 20:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)- Screw it then. Off it goes. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image removed. Эlcobbola talk 16:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Screw it then. Off it goes. Sandman888 (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Could you be more specific. The cule image relies on a subjective criterion of enhancing understanding so I'd like other editors opinion about it. Sandman888(talk) 19:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
