Wikipedia talk:Education program archive/Duquesne University/UCOR 143 (Spring 2014)/Grading

Grading

edit
0 pts. 2 pts. 4 pts.
Approved Article
Weight: 20%
The article was not from a peer-reviewed article. The article was from a peer-reviewed source but dated more than six years ago. The article was from a peer-reviewed journal within the last 6 years.
Appropriately Situated into Wikipedia
Weight: 20%
Unaware of the topic themes and how they interrelate. Demonstrates knowledge of the topic but places information out of context. Themes are addressed in proper context.
Knowledge of Hinduism
Weight: 20%
Failure to tie the article into the topic of Hinduism. Summarizes the article's outline. Illustrates several unique insights into Hinduism the article communicated.
Idea Analysis
Weight: 20%
Lacks basic understanding of the issue or assignment, little or no analysis. Demonstrates basic understanding of the issue or assignment, at times resorts to summarizing rather than analysis. Original, thoughtful and perceptive, demonstrating complete command of the material.
Grammar
Weight: 20%
Numerous errors that show lack of care and impede understanding of argument; notable mechanical errors Some errors, uneven use of language, occasionally errant sentence structure or inappropriate word choice. Free of errors; good use of language, none or few mechanical errors and on time.