Wikipedia talk:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 October 16

To make it clear, the below comments of mine have been copied from [[User talk:Jc37]'s talk page, made here and here. Hiding Talk 21:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re that category closure

edit

If you want to query the category for deletion debate closure, to my mind you are better off asking the closer why they closed it, not adding a comment to a closed debate. Edits made after closure are routinely removed. A quick note at User talk:Centrx is the best way of getting a response. Hope that helps. Hiding Talk 21:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey. I notice you haven't brought this up with Centrx yet, do you intend to or not? Just wondering. Could always move your discussion to the talk page otherwise? Hiding Talk 14:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I was hoping that Centrix would take the opportunity to clarify the early closure, before this became a "talk page discussion". In any case, I'll leave a note on Centrix's talk page pointing him to this discussion. - jc37 20:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's concerning because it was closed one day after listing. I don't see comments about "speedy", or WP:SNOW, for example, nor the requisite rationale why. This is not unprecedented in CfD, by the way; an editor noting early closure often results in a relisting. - jc37 20:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why do you think that category should not be deleted? —Centrxtalk • 05:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have no opinion atm on whether it should be deleted, my concern is that it was deleted after a single day, rather than going through the full length of time - go through the full process - that is customary on CfD, and without any comment stating the rationale for the "out of process" deletion. - jc37 06:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply