Wikipedia talk:Annotated article
Wikipedia Help NA‑class | |||||||
|
Comments edit
Why are there only external links? An example of a 'references' section (and probably even notes) would be instructive, I think. — mark ✎ 16:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I think an example of a "References" section needs to be added in the standard position (that is, under the "See also" section.) -- Mecandes 12:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This is the page I was looking for when joining Wikipedia! Is there a place for it somewhere in the Help: domain? — dogears (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Include indentation edit
Could text indentation (using the ":") be included in that article, please. --Dietmar Lettau 12:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Use of bold edit
Why is the word unladen in boldface in the lead paragraph? I'd remove this in a real article. —D. Monack talk 08:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I see that the actual article does the same thing, so I guess I'll remove it in both places. —D. Monack talk 08:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Another article? edit
I guess the real question should be, "Why isn't a featured article used for annotation?" If this is supposed to be instructional, shouldn't the best possible example be used? Autorack even has a cleanup notice on it. Ideally, the example used would have a references section and maybe an infobox. —D. Monack talk 08:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Repetitive annotation edit
Should the annotation about the picture really repeat so many times? Craig Pemberton (talk) 02:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Are autoracks special in any way? edit
Why autoracks specifically? What is so special about them? Do you guys, huh, like autoracks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.139.143.122 (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted Section in Italian edit
Deleted the following section:
Questo elaborato prende come riferimento il testo “Cervelli che parlano: il dibattito su mente,coscienza e intelligenza artificiale”. Gli spunti argomentativi sono stati selezionati dal capitolo “Intenzionalità e intelligenza artificiale” di Eddy Carli e si è cercato poi di elaborarli, attraverso l’evento concreto di bere una birra, tenendo come riferimento le teorie e il punto di vista di Antonio Damasio.
Does not appear to have anything to do with the article aside from the obvious issue of not being in English.Bobdog54 (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete comments edit
Since the change of the layout in 2023 TOC is displayed elsewhere. I'm not sure how to properly address that. RadostW (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)