This page is used as a discussion page for the collaboration of getting Jackie Robinson to GA Status.

Stats

edit
  • References- 52
  • Bytes- 40,878

Notes

edit

The articles has about 10 paragraphs without citations, not counting Jackie Robinson#Awards and recognition which look like easy to source facts, but there's a lot of them. I wonder who the main contributers are? Might be a good idea to collaborate with them. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure but its Thedemonhog who got the highest number of edits. See here. --Efe (talk) 11:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That was for an episode of lost. Here's the right one, and they don't edit it much anymore. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 15:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The bullet point list looks unprofessional. Is there any other way of mentioning awards, such as with the principal text? Universal Hero (talk) 22:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I previously did some work to this article a little while ago (as RyRy (talk · contribs) before I was renamed... I'm still waiting for my contributions to move to my new account). I'll see what I can do from here to help. Thanks, – RyanCross (talk) 03:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess I'll first do some referencing, and then I'll do some copyediting after. Any help would be appreciated. – RyanCross (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added some refs to the Jackie Robinson#Awards and recognition section. That section will need to be converted to normail paragraphs instead of a list, and the refs converted to a template, but it's a start. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remember to keep in mind {{citeweb}} when adding refs. I saw you added references without the correct format.--LAAFansign review 21:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've just been doing bare url refs. I'll add the templates later. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • RL's taking its toll on me.. but upon completion I'll make sure to review this immediately upon posting at GAN, since I don't have the time to expand the article. Wizardman 21:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other Comments

edit

Final Comments (after collaboration is over)

edit