Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Trent University/History of Western Canada (Winter 2018)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
History of Western Canada
Institution
Trent University
Instructor
Christopher Dummitt
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
History
Course dates
2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-04-21 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
53


This is a history of Western Canada at the time just before and just after its incorporation into the Canadian nation in the 1860s and 1870s. Students will be expected to edit and/or write wikipedia articles on key figures, concepts, institutions, or events from this era. They can either do this individually or work in groups.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Mb.westcan.11 Treaty 7 Ralph Connor, Gabriel Dumont
Vscartapenna Hayter Reed Mistawasis, Sara Riel
Esthermcmillan
Delaniestrath William Mactavish Treaty 5, Henry Youle Hind
Katherinem97 Frederick Seymour
Ginny Sadlier Ralph Connor William Mactavish, Humphrey Lloyd Hime
Erinmrmurray Treaty 5
Jaymechapman Manitoba Act
Spencerborotsik Sweet Grass (Cree chief)
MMelo
Alyssakirkbride
Victoriapelky Sara Riel Red River Rebellion, Alexander Morris (politician), Treaty 1
FrancoSaxonJackson Palliser's Triangle Pemmican Proclamation, 1837 Great Plains smallpox epidemic
JCMN Red Fife wheat Treaty 6, Treaty 4
Rachelorbell Palliser expedition Gabriel Dumont (Métis leader)
MikeKelly Mistawasis Ahtahkakoop, Lawrence Vankoughnet
Mdunn8 Treaty 1
JWallace96 Wolseley expedition
Adamnatalizio Sweet Grass (Cree chief)
Alexandramurphy Frederick Seymour Treaty 5, Treaty 2
Tyler Shapton
Brycesaulnier Wandering Spirit (Cree leader)
MeliviaBlank Wandering Spirit (Cree leader)
Nadine Viveiros Ralph Connor Sweet Grass (Cree chief), Manitoba Act
Kdoughty88 Pemmican Proclamation
Monicathomson Robert Semple (Canada)
Mary Jessica Parsons Edgar Dewdney Humphrey Lloyd Hime, Letitia MacTavish Hargrave
Johnny.Lynch67 Pemmican Proclamation
Clairecrompton1 Edgar Dewdney Manitoba Act, Sara Riel
KylePugh Humphrey Lloyd Hime Henry Youle Hind, Letitia MacTavish Hargrave
MTralla Wandering Spirit (Cree leader)
ReaganMacDonald Gabriel Dumont (Métis leader) Wandering Spirit (Cree leader), Alexander Morris
Alanaesimons Frederick Seymour Pemmican Proclamation, Wolseley Expedition
BiancaTrentU Lawrence Vankoughnet
Erinparent Henry Youle Hind
Sammitchelleditor Alexander Morris (politician)
Noahwilson
Brittanynickerson
Brooklynfurrow Treaty 4
JasmineQuinn Treaty 7 Pemmican Proclamation, Canadian Indian Residential School System.
Brendan Bell-Earle Sweet Grass (Cree chief)
Abigaaailbrown Treaty 5 Edgar Dewdney, Frederick Seymour
James.Gough.93 Gabriel Dumont (Métis leader) Fort Pitt Provincial Park, Mistawasis
GeorginaLW Ahtahkakoop
Austincapell Fort Pitt Provincial Park Hayter Reed, Médard des Grosseilliers
Samuelwoodbeck National Policy Wolseley expedition, Pemmican Proclamation
Chris jumbo Treaty 2
Alexandermackenzie Edgar Dewdney
Dbarnabe Wandering Spirit (Cree leader)
Neillsandison Maskepetoon
SamanthaLeigh Frederick Seymour Pemmican Proclamation
Morganmcnamee
KieranKL
BradGallant Fort Pitt Provincial Park
Littlefluff82 1837 Great Plains smallpox epidemic Hayter Reed, Wandering Spirit
ShawnHinves Letitia MacTavish Hargrave Sweet Grass (Cree chief)
Brettpeters1993 Frederick Seymour
Hayley.browning Treaty 6
Travis Szabolcs
C killeen
ShawnMcQuitty Fort Pitt Provincial Park
C Rid
Cmcleish
Jessica Parsons97 Edgar Dewdney Letitia MacTavish Hargrave, Humphrey Lloyd Hime
Cmcleish97 William Tomison

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Thursday, 11 January 2018
Introduction to the Wikipedia project - Assignment #1

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Your first assignment begins even before you arrive. You should show up to the first class having done the following: 
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.) 
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Thursday, 18 January 2018
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia - Assignment #2

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  •  Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
  •  Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, and when writing your evaluation, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    •  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  •  Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC). [reply]
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings
Thursday, 25 January 2018
Assignment - Add to an article - Assignment #3

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources - Assignment #4

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 4

Course meetings
Thursday, 1 February 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and websites are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
  • How can you separate an author's argument from the factual information that they provide on a topic? How should you deal with both the argument and the evidence in the writing of a wikipedia entry?
Best practices for working in groups
  • Once your group has a Wikipedia article to work on, make sure everyone in the group is assigned to that article on the Students tab of this course page.
  • Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. (It will be titled something like User:Diderot/sandbox.) Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
  • Wikipedia doesn't handle multiple people editing from different devices at the same time very well. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
  • Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.
Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area



Week 5

Course meetings
Thursday, 8 February 2018
Assignment - Draft your article - Assignment #5

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Thursday, 15 February 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit - Assignment #6
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings
Thursday, 1 March 2018
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings
Thursday, 8 March 2018
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.
Assignment - Did You Know
  • Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see the DYK instructions handout) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education staff can provide support for this process.



Handout: "Did You Know" submissions

Week 9

Course meetings
Thursday, 15 March 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.

Week 10

Course meetings
Thursday, 22 March 2018
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 11

Course meetings
Thursday, 29 March 2018
Assignment - Final article - Assignment #7

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!
Assignment - Reflective essay - Assignment #8

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 12

Course meetings
Thursday, 5 April 2018
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.