Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Klis Fortress

Klis Fortress edit

The article is currently a B-class. I am interested in opinions of more experienced editors on how the quality and standard of the article can be improved for GA class. The article is not finished yet. Sections: Šubić's rule over the fortress (Šubić family and Tvrtko I) and Fortress lost its strategic weight (Venetians and Austrians) will be expended. After I am done with them, I hope that user Laurinavicius will do the necessary copyediting. The section: Interesting Notes should stay, or be implemented into the article? I will also add all necessary inline citations and improve references. The feedback that I am most interested is abouth the structure of an article. Is it broad in its coverage, focused and neutral? Because we are talking about two thousand year-long history. Thanks. Kebeta (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AustralianRupert edit

A couple of technical points:

  • according to the [article tools] there are a number of disambig links that need to be checked and piped through to the more correct links.;  Done
  • the images could have alt text added to them per WP:ALT;  Done
  • there are a few points that have a Citation needed tag, which will need to be rectified for a GA (even a B class would probably require these to be fixed)  Done
  • some of the date format is not consistent with the Manual of Style, for instance in the "Klis - A sanjak centre of Bosnia" section you have 7 April, 1596. Per the MOS this should be either "7 April 1596", or "April 7, 1596" (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Full date formatting;  Done
  • the Bibliography should be sorted alphabetically by author's surname.  Done

Anyway, these are just a few points to get the review started. Hopefully some more editors will be able to provide some pointers too. Good work so far, by the way. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AustralianRupert for your review! I will implement this into the article soon. Regards, --Kebeta (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]