Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Robert Peverell Hichens

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Promoted -MBK₀₀₄ 09:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peverell Hichens

Nominator(s): Jim Sweeney (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it has been peer reviewed and just passed GA but I would like some pointers to get it to A Class. thanks Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
- No problems with alt text, disambig links, or external links. Well done!
- Your house names are in italics, but given the nature of the article I would like to know if this is necessary. Italics here lend the impression that we are talking about houseboats, but I find that hard to believe since a houseboat is in my mind not exactly the best place to raise a family. I would suggest that unless its absolutely needed you remove the italics from the house names.
Otherwise it looks good. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review - No they were not houseboats so I have removed the italics --Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alright then, I'm happy. TomStar81 (Talk) 14:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comments~~ Support: this is a very good biography in my opinion. Well done, I have a couple of comments I'd like looked at before supporting, but they are only minor:
- should "Hill Climbing" in the lead be in caps?
- in the infobox the dates for TA service are 1929-36 and RNVR 1936-43, however, in the Second World War section it says he requested a transfer from TA in 1930, so should it be TA 1929-30 and RNVR 1930-1943? Not sure, though;
- should "Knots" in Coastal forces section be in caps?
- should "Flak" (as in trawler) in 8th MGB Flotilla be in caps?
- should "Motor Launches" in Casualties section be in caps?
- in the Casualties section you use date range of "1942/43" should this be "1942–43"?

Other than these minor things, I think the article is very well done. I tweaked a couple of minor grammatical things as I found them. Well done. Once the above comments are fixed and or explained, I'd be more than happy to support. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 21:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hill Climbing changed to hill climbing

changed to and eventually transferred to the Royal Naval Volunteer Supplementary Reserve in 1936 does that make it clearer ?

Knot to knot

Flak to flak

I believe Motor Launch should be in caps as in Motor Gun Boat and Motor Torpedo Boat see this link [1] --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My comments have been addressed, so I've changed my vote to support. Well done and thanks for your contribution. — AustralianRupert (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and support. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support: An excellent article. I can't see anything that should stop it from be promoted. Anotherclown (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.