Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Henry Hoʻolulu Pitman

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Anotherclown (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 10:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Nominator(s): KAVEBEAR (talk)

Henry Hoʻolulu Pitman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it meets the criteria. Henry Hoʻolulu Pitman was one of a small group of Civil War soldiers of Hawaiian descent who have been subject of renewed scholarly interest of Asian/Pacific Islander soldiers in the American Civil War in the recent decade. Thanks for any feedback. KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I've looked at the changes made since I reviewed this for FAC. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 17:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments: G'day, nice work with this one. I have a few minor nitpicks only: AustralianRupert (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • in the Bibliography, "Pacific Islanders and the Civil War". In Shively, Carol A. Asians and Pacific Islanders and the Civil War", as this is a chapter in a book, can a page range be provided for the chapter (to make this consistent with the way the journals are presented)?
  • some of the works in the Bibliography might have OCLC numbers, which can usually be found at worldcat.org: [1]
  • the Kam work probably should be moved out of the External links section to either the Bibliography or a Further reading section
  • in the infobox: "1862–1863" should be "1862–63" per WP:DATERANGE;
  • the duplicate link checker tool identifies the following as overlinked: Honolulu (in the lead), Battle of Fredericksburg, Union (American Civil War);
  • "...of "a pair of thin, high-heeled and narrow soled boots" he had purchased..." --> the citation of the work where this quote comes from probably should be placed directly after the quote;
  • citation order: "...mixed race,[53][1]" --> "...mixed race,[1][53]" (there are a few examples of this)

@AustralianRupert: Let me know what else I can address. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made a minor prose tweak, but other than that it looks good for A-class to me. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.