Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Strasbourg/archive1
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Battle of Strasbourg edit
I nominate this article for EraNavigator who wants a review, a peer review, to see what could be done better. However, in my opinion, the article is of a quality that surpasses the usual peer review article and for ironing out the errors a higher level review is needed. For this reason, I nominate it for an A-class review, contrary to the wishes of its main author. Wandalstouring (talk) 11:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Detailed, sourced, well-written and formatted article that, in my opinion, meets the A-class standards. One concern...the "modern" references appear to need publisher's info. Cla68 (talk) 21:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. It's an insteresting article that meets A-class criteria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriakos (talk • contribs) 00:18, 21 June 2008
Comments: Good piece.
- Sources: The citations are sprawling and untidy, the multi-ref template is best for repeated citations. I've done a few as examples. The heading is usually "Notes". Is more commentary available from modern sources?
- Prose: needs a spruce up before going to FAC (if that's the intention). It's a bit awkward and choppy in places. Geuiwogbil may be help here: it's very much his period.
- --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as i've cleaned the refs a bit. Also, it would need major changes to the referencing style for an FAC. --Eurocopter (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.