AfD Unreferenced BLP. I'm confused about his record: the info box shows 18-3, the article's list of fights shows just 2 (both losses), and kickboxer.mag.co.au shows his record at 27-14. This mag also lists him as the #7 junior middleweight kickboxer in Australia. Don't think that's quite enough. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD His Golden Gloves championship was for New York City--nice, but not sufficient for WP:MANOTE. No indication his career as a lawyer passes WP:GNG. His work as a boxing promoter may be notable, but I'm not sure how to judge that. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD No indication of notability except for receiving his black belt from Ed Parker and notability is not inherited. Also lacks third party sources. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD started. It survived AfD before, but I think it's worth revisiting. Papaursa (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not sure how anyone could mark K-1 as being non-notable. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
comment There was a defective template copying the 'notability' tag into every article it was transcluded into. I removed all uses of the template. jmcw (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but possibly biased Gsearch turns up mainly people associated with it or lists of organizations. I'm familiar with it in connection with running WAKO's US kickboxing championships. It's not COI, but is that considered OR? Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's policy on original research says that if you are putting forward an idea or analysis not already published, that is original research. If you know about an organisation's notability, and can provide some reliable sources for that view, then it's not original research. If this organisation really is notable, there are probably some references out there to support this, and it's likely just a question of finding them. Janggeom (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upon further research, it appears this KICK and the KICK associated with WAKO are different organizations. However, I did add sourcing to the article and removed the "unreferenced" tag. I left the notability tag in case others wish to comment. The article could use work, but the organization is probably still a "weak keep". Papaursa (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD. This article was nominated for speedy deletion on 15 September 2009 (the day it was created) but this was contested. It is possible that the subject's notability might be more easily established from French language sources, but I have not found strong support for notability yet. Janggeom (talk) 15:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD I didn't find independent sources, but I stuck with English sources. Papaursa (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
