Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Article Review/21st July 2010

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts | Article Review

Added July 21

edit
AfD I'm not seeing any documented evidence that shows he passes WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if claims can be verified, otherwise AfD Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Lots of google hits, but mainly passing mentions like "so and so was certified to teach self-defense by NWMAF". Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD The only claim to notability is founding a style and I can't find reliable sources to show that style is notable. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
July 26, 1967
Oakland Tribune from Oakland, California • Page 66
Black Belt Magazine June 1967
Photographic evidence Tae Kwon Do good will mission Germany
Much info and sources:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ImuaShanTungKunTao/ 2806:102E:7:16CA:9C53:4657:7F0A:B99A (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AfD No sources to back up claims. Three time European grand champion is a possible claim to notability, but it's unsourced and doesn't say of what organization or event. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
July 26, 1967
Oakland Tribune from Oakland, California • Page 66
Black Belt Magazine June 1967
Photographic evidence Tae Kwon Do good will mission Germany
Much info and sources:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ImuaShanTungKunTao/ 2806:102E:7:16CA:9C53:4657:7F0A:B99A (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Mainly based on the fact that there are no sources for the claims. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD I don't see notability as a martial artist or newsman. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Fails WP:MANOTE and WP:GNG. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Clearly fails WP:MMANOT. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Fails WP:MMANOT. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a bit stronger case for keep than some others, who have won only a single medal.
AfD Relatively new martial arts system and article has no independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AfD Fails WP:MMANOT, but has 18 fights. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD because the article has no sources--just 2 links to a picture of him. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if sources can be found to support claims, otherwise AfD Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD He wouldn't meet the notability criteria even if the claims were sourced, which they're not. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Don't see notability or sources. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article could use a complete rewrite and some more independent sources, but the supported claim of being adopted as a UK police standard is sufficient for me. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Article has no sources that show it's a notable martial art. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AFD Don't see notability. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see why this is under WPMA Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed: [1] jmcw (talk) 09:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AfD Article doesn't really show notability, but the 2 books referenced may support the claim that many Wing Chun practictioners descend from him. Could use input from a Wing Chun expert. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Unsourced BLP. His work and books may or may not be notable, but without sources the article shows no reason to keep. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Another unsourced BLP. Even with sources I don't see the notability. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Does claim he's won a world championship, but no sources and I haven't heard of the organization. Astudent0 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Another BLP that is basically unsourced. Claims like he taught many grandmasters of various styles really need references. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if claims can be verified Article has no independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
clearly non-notable as a martial artist No sources to support any martial arts claim. Can't comment on notability as a comic artist. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article could use a rewrite and definitely needs better sources, but he is notable in wushu. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD I just don't see the subject's notability in this article. Papaursa (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review/21st_July_2010&oldid=1158056355"