Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Charles Darwin
After two weeks spent citing it up, adding over 140 new cites, I think it's nearly ready for FA. Is there anything we might be missing, though? Adam Cuerden talk 03:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- What's the point of this? If its nearly ready for FA, get it ready and send it to FA. No point wasting people's time on Peer Review. pschemp | talk 04:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- We'd like to be sure before we send it off, as we have a certain amount of finishing up to do involving templating footnotes anyway, and would rather not have nasty surprises once we hit FAC. Adam Cuerden talk 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why don't you trust the editors on the page? They have FAC experience and know what is required. If you let them work, there won't be any nasty surprises. pschemp | talk 04:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's not that I don't trust them, it's that I don't trust me, and Dave seems a little nervous. If you think something more informal will do fine, right'n. Adam Cuerden talk 04:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wait and see what Mikker gives you. pschemp | talk 04:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's not that I don't trust them, it's that I don't trust me, and Dave seems a little nervous. If you think something more informal will do fine, right'n. Adam Cuerden talk 04:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why don't you trust the editors on the page? They have FAC experience and know what is required. If you let them work, there won't be any nasty surprises. pschemp | talk 04:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- We'd like to be sure before we send it off, as we have a certain amount of finishing up to do involving templating footnotes anyway, and would rather not have nasty surprises once we hit FAC. Adam Cuerden talk 04:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)