Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Combustor

Combustor edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Now that the article has gotten through a pretty thorough peer review that added some useful content, I’d like to get this article promoted to A-class. All modesty aside, I think it is the best written, best cited, "component" article in the Aviation project, and I think improving it to the A-class level would help set a clear standard for these types of articles (which we need to do better on as a wikiproject, IMO). I think the article is close to A level, and I’m looking forward to bridging that final gap with your help. Thanks! -SidewinderX (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Looks like a fine article. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As had been said previously, the article is superb. Just one thing I'd like to add is that you might want to consider putting the ISBN number on the references which I assume are from a book. Otherwise, on first read its a very good article. Hope this helps, Plane Person (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for your comments. If you look in the Bibliography section, below the references, the full citations with ISBNs are spelled out. -SidewinderX (talk) 15:39, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, didn't see the bibliography. Personally I can't see anything wrong with the article now to stop it gaining an A-Class award but I'm not very experianced and I don't know fully the specific A-Class criteria. Plane Person (talk) 16:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I have had a look at the article in the past and recently and made a few minor corrections (not all of which were retained) and must say it is a very good article. However there may be some confusion with combustor in the incinerator sense. Some method of disambiguation may be required like-

Combustor (continuous combustion engines)

something like that. Just a thoughtPetebutt (talk) 14:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying, but is there an article on wikipedia for that other type of combustor already? -SidewinderX (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This review needs more input or be closed out in some manner. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.