Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Peer review/archive/2008

L'Opéra of the Palace of Versailles

--E. Lighthart (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Amandajm (talk) 03:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC). Definitely not an A. It contains errors and/or confusions. It lacks formatting eg. It has no sections or clear intro. It needs its references properly and consistently formatted. As an architectural article about a single work of architecture it requires a competent description of the building itself.[reply]

Salon d'Hercule

--E. Lighthart (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed. A lot of work to be done. Amandajm (talk) 03:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Peer review/Hall of Mirrors

Appartement du roi

Seeking review pursuant to Wiki MOS and criteria for project inclusion.

E. Lighthart (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed. Most of the info is there, but it needs work. Particularly the translation of all the French terms. What, for a start, does "roi" mean? This is an English encyclopedia. Amandajm (talk) 04:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gardens of Versailles

Seeking review pursuant to Wiki MOS and criteria for project inclusion.

E. Lighthart (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somerset Towers

This extensive article on the church towers of Somerset tries to cover a massive topic and describe the similarities and differences between the different towers. I would appreciate any guidance, particularly about architectural description and the number of images as i think this article could make it to GA & even possibly FA with expert guidance.— Rod ^talk 18:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bath Stone

I have recently expanded this article from a stub and would welcome comments, particularly on the balance between "uses" describing the buildings it has been used for and the geology, and quarries sections.— Rod ^talk 18:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cannons (house)

I am planning on submitting this article to GA but thought that WikiProject Architecture would be a good place to get some initial feedback especially as I feel that the architecture part of the article is currently one of the weaker sections. Thanks in advance. nancy ^(talk) 14:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]