Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported a policy change

This is a list of occasions when at least 100 Wikipedians (ideally excluding sock puppets) explicitly voted for a policy change.

See also:

Ratification vote on C-Class
  • 153 in support, 107 opposed; passed
Criteria for Speedy Deletion Proposal
  1. Unremarkable people – 120 to implement
  2. Attack pages – 110 to implement
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress
Semi-protection policy straw poll
  • 103 voted in favor of the policy.
Three revert rule enforcement
  • 159 voted to implement the enforcement.
Userbox debate
  1. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin/Original – 127 to endorse the view that Kelly Martin abused her sysop powers
  2. Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions – 185 to keep
  3. Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll – 163 in favor
  4. Wikipedia:May Userbox policy poll – 105 in favor of moving userboxes to a userbox namespace, as proposed by User:TheTrueSora
Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
  • 133 voting in support of the policy in straw poll.
Wikipedia:Blocking policy proposal straw poll
  • Of the two options in favor of the policy, 97 voted for option A and 126 for option B, a total vote in favor of 223 (to 11 against).
Jehochman's proposal at the BLP RfC
  • 163 in support when the discussion was paused for cohesion late on 31 January 2010 (UTC).
The 2010 Rfc on 'Community de-adminship' which would have enabled a process for editors to remove adminship tools
  • 167 in support, 190 opposed
The petition condemning IAR abuse by administrators
  • 100 signatures in a week
A proposal to create a Protected Page Editor user right (first attempt)
  • 134 in support (consensus not reached)
A proposal to create a Protected Page Editor user right (second attempt)
  • 141 in support, 149 opposed
A proposal to restore the orange "You have new messages" bar for notifications of user talk messages
  • 153 in support
A proposal to expand the use of extended confirmed protection
  • 153 in support of widening the usage of extended confirmed protection to combat disruption of any form
An amendment to the arbitration policy
  • 113 in support
Introduction of desysop policy as proposed by TonyBallioni
  • 168 in support, 138 in opposition; consensus not reached