Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 29

< May 28	May 30 >

May 29 edit

Template:East Lothian Golf Courses edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:East Lothian Golf Courses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template violate wikipedia's notability guidelines, and should be deleted because it has failed to acheive consensus. GOLFAUTHORITY 16:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Seems to be used on enough articles, not sure of the notability of golf courses though. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Of the seven blue-links in the template, only four are about actual golf courses. Rather than plastering several articles with a template containing so many redlinks, I think it makes more sense to use a category in this case. When Category:Golf clubs and courses in Scotland becomes large enough to justify splitting it, a category for East Lothian could be created. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 18:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Organization3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Organization3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Organization}} and only used in 1 article. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here @} 05:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - WP:CSD#T3, I think... Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 17:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: based on this edit, it looks like the infobox was intended to be a single-article template. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 18:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The X's Characters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Garion96 (talk) 15:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The X's Characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, and except for one link to a disambig page, all links in the template redirect to the same page. BD2412 T 03:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete - it's not used at all and, as the nominator aid, all the links redirect to The X's. On the WP:TfD page it says that a reason for deletion is that the template is not used... and has no likelihood of being used. Because all of the links redirect to one page, it can only be used on one page, rendering a 'navigation' template useless. JulieSpaulding (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, all content redirected. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.