February 17 edit

Template:2008-09 Ohio Valley Conference men's basketball standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008-09 Ohio Valley Conference men's basketball standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a duplicate template and is not used. Jbtoton (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wiktionaryleft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wiktionaryleft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused in articlespace, unneeded and doesn't fit the modern sisterlinks design. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - unused and counter to current style. Robofish (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. If having the sisterlinks templates on the left is desirable (I don't think it is), it's better to just add a parameter to the existing template(s). –Black Falcon (Talk) 07:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Black Falcon's entry; a float parameter in the current template is all that's needed. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Francisco mayoral election, 2003 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Francisco mayoral election, 2003 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This specialized template has been superseded by use of general election templates in San Francisco mayoral election, 2003 article. kurykh 01:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.