Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Stryker (disc jockey)

Stryker (disc jockey)

Resolved:

Dispute seems to have resolved itself.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

---

view edit delete watch
Filed: 07:20, February 1 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

• Craigtalbert (talk · contribs)
• jimmycracker (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

• Stryker (disc jockey)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

• WP:RFC Talk:Stryker (disc jockey)#Request_for_Comment:_Online_petitions
• WP:3 Talk:Stryker (disc jockey)#Third_Opinion
• See also initial discussion in the talk page of the article Talk:Stryker_(disc_jockey)#Wow.

Issues to be mediated

• Should Stryker (disc jockey) include a link to an online petition? (the purpose of which is to get Stryker off the air, 'cause the signers don't like him)
• Potential Conflicts of interest in the article Stryker (disc jockey) per edits made from 170.20.96.116 (an IP address known to be associated with CBS) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], similar non-anonymous edits continued. CBS Radio owns Westwood One, the company that produces the radio show Loveline on which Stryker is the co-host.
• Lack of civility displayed by User:Jimmycracker in discussion of the article making it difficult to productively collaborate with him.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

1. Agree. Jimmycracker 07:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
2. Agree. Craigtalbert 08:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

• Accept:

For the Mediation Committee, Shyam ^(T/C) 15:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm taking this case. I'll be contacting parties shortly. —Xyrael / 12:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

This case is now being mediated over e-mail. —Xyrael / 13:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.