Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Neo-Nazism

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Opposition parties have been indefinitely blocked.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Neo-Nazism edit

view edit delete watch
Filed: 01:45, December 6 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Cberlet (talk · contribs)
Vision Thing (talk · contribs)
Intangible2.0 (talk · contribs)
EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) (now blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia)
Smerdyakoff (talk · contribs) (now blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia)[1]
Spylab (talk · contribs)

Articles involved edit

Neo-Nazism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted edit

Issues to be mediated edit

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

Issue 1: What are the contemporary scholarly descriptions defining the current use of the term "Neo-Nazism"
Issue 2: What constitutes a reputable published scholarly source cite of the term "Neo-Nazism"

Additional issues to be mediated edit

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there is more than two parties involved in this case.

Reliability of certain sources and original research. — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 03:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Use of books without page numbers as references. — EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 03:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of well-referenced content based on point of view, not reliability of sources. Spylab (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

Agree. Cberlet (talk) 01:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. EliasAlucard (talk · contribs) 02:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree.--Smerdyakoff (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Intangible2.0 (talk) 14:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Spylab (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. -- Vision Thing -- 11:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.

Accept.

For the Mediation Committee, -- tariqabjotu 21:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taken by me, please refer the talk page for further discussion. - Shyam ^(T/C) 06:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.