Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Juris Doctor

Juris Doctor edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

successful

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

request links: view edit delete watch

Filed: 13:38, March 1 2009 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Wikiant (talk · contribs), filing party
Zoticogrillo (talk · contribs)
JJL (talk · contribs)
Nicholas Jackson (talk · contribs)

Filing party: you must serve all of these editors with notifications. See here for instructions.

Articles involved edit

Juris_Doctor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted edit

Filing party: Please ensure you have fully read this guide before filing.

Issues to be mediated edit

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

Three editors agree to an major change in the article. One (Zoticogrillo) disagrees and refuses to allow the change. Evidence from the past suggests that Zoticogrillo will engage in an editing war until opposing editors give up and go away.
Whether the article should state that the J.D. is a doctorate and how to organize conflicting information on the topic.

Additional issues to be mediated edit

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.

Whether there has been editor misconduct, and whether there should be administrative action to limit editing to the page.
Additional issue 2.

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

Agree. Wikiant (talk) 13:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. JJL (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Zoticogrillo (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Nicholas Jackson (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member.

Accept.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.