Dokdo edit

Resolved:

Parties did not demonstrate good-faith.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Involved parties edit

Articles involved edit

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted: edit

  • None.

Issues to be mediated edit

  • The article's wordings in the introductory section.

Additional issues to be mediated edit

  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree. (Wikimachine 06:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  2. Agree.--Opp2 09:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Agree --DandanxD 08:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Agree. -- Ginnre 06:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Agree -- Good friend100 03:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Agree.--Endroit 18:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

Accepted

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 02:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to take this case. But I want to know your opinion about the type of mediation. Please let me know, you want private (via e-mails) or public (on Wikipedia itself) mediation. Thanks, Shyam (T/C) 16:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd like the mediation to be open. (Wikimachine 00:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    • So, if all of us agree with public mediation then please proceed to talk page. Shyam (T/C) 06:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.