Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church

Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church edit

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Closed as stale.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

request links: view edit delete watch

Filed: 12:07, Jan 19 2009 (UTC)

Involved parties edit

Student7 (talk · contribs), filing party
Yozzer66 (talk · contribs)
Farsight001 (talk · contribs)
Johnbod (talk · contribs)

Filing party: you must serve all of these editors with notifications. See here for instructions.

Notified 12:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles involved edit

Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted edit

Talk:Criticism_of_the_Roman_Catholic_Church#Counting_the_bloodstains_on_the_butchers_apron - discussion on article page
Talk:Criticism_of_the_Roman_Catholic_Church#Bias - discussion on article page
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography - request for comment

Filing party: Please ensure you have fully read this guide before filing.

Read.Student7 (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Issues to be mediated edit

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

Additional issues to be mediated edit

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.

Additional issue 1.
Additional issue 2.

Parties' agreement to mediate edit

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

Agree. Student7 (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, ~~somewhat reluctantly. I have only commented on the "bias" talk section.~~ Johnbod (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Yozzer66 (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Farsight001 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee edit

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member.

Accept.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Case taken by KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.