Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 October 20

Parvin Etesami Private High School & Pre-University Center

edit

I ran across this while on new pages patrol. I know schools are exempt from a7 yet, there are no sources and, I can't find anything searching Google. It looks to me like a copy and paste from some source but, like I mentioned before, I can't find anything on this school. Any thoughts?


Planetary ChaosTalk 04:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Alive & Kicking an African social enterprise. Please add your feedback, thanks!

Vitda22688 (talk) 09:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is my first article, and I would love some feedback.

I have tried and failed to upload photographs, please can someone help me? I would also like to link to a picture of Matthew Crabb carving the Virgin Mary I have refered to which is already on Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VirginMarySchochwitz.jpg

Please be gentle with me :) Thanks for your help Natasha

Natashajordan84 (talk) 10:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please can you review this? Thanks

Greaves.kirsten (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

young footballing prospect

edit

i would like somebody to review this article of a young footballer , great read good information extremely true a good friend of mine and deserves the recognition of a read. need to get his carrer posted to help boost his profiling, only a few short paragraphs so not alot to read please somebody review this and help me get my friend on the right track !


England 4 (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't linked anything, and there is no history of editing any articles in your contribs, no one has a clue what article you're referring to, unless you do. Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 08:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have just published a new article about this play.

I am confident that it meets the Wikipedia standards - notability, third-party references, etc.. But I think it is good practice to get feedback on new articles.


Skeowsha (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was reviewed in February 2011 and has had changes according to the recommendations. The recommendations appear on the wiki page are not current and should be removed. D.L. Bearden, PhD


Dbbearden (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]