Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2012 August 21
Miscellaneous desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 20 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 22 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
August 21 edit
Where can I read the text of the Michigan 2012 "Protect Our Jobs" initiative ? edit
See here: [1]. I'd also settle for a neutral summary, but more than just "The initiative would add the right to collective bargaining for public and private sector employees to the state Constitution", which is all that source says. Doesn't anybody do this anymore ? All I get are dishonest ads from both sides.
I'd like to create an article on the proposal, if we don't already have one and we can find neutral sources. StuRat (talk) 22:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- If anyone cares, the server (IIS 6.0) is returning a filename with unencoded spaces in it ("Petition language nicholoff 1 31 12.pdf"). I suspect this is illegal and different browsers will handle it differently. Firefox breaks the name at the first space and saves the file as "Petition". -- BenRG (talk) 19:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Something else I don't quite understand about the Michigan proposal process is that after a petition is certified as having enough signatures, the "Michigan Board of Canvassers" apparently must approve it for the ballot by majority vote. However, having 2 members of each party, deadlock is virtually assured there, so I'm surprised anything gets approved by them. There then seems to be a process of suing to get it on the ballot anyway. This process all seems bizarre and incomprehensible to me. Can anyone explain it ? StuRat (talk) 23:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- You seem to understand it fine already. The central points are:
- the Michigan Board of Canvassers must approve it for the ballot by majority vote,
- deadlock is virtually assured there,
- there's a process of suing to get it on the ballot anyway,
- bizarre and incomprehensible.
203.27.72.5 (talk) 23:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)