Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 September 13

Mathematics desk
< September 12 << Aug | September | Oct >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


September 13

edit

Prove or disprove: These numbers are composite for all n>=2 such that these numbers are positive

edit

Prove or disprove: These numbers are composite for all n>=2 such that these numbers are positive

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.  
  6.  
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  

118.170.47.16 (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re   #3:  
Re   #4:  
Re   #6:  
Re   #7:  
Re   #8:  
Re #23:  
Re #24:  
Re #30:  
Re #36:  
These are all special cases of the difference of two nth powers.  --Lambiam 10:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do your own homework. SamuelRiv (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on other posts with this type of number theoretic-focused content coming from IPs in the same geographic area (north Taiwan), I'm pretty sure this isn't meant to be homework. WP:CRUFT, perhaps, but this is the Reference Desk, and it seems to me that it's a lot less of an issue to have it here than elsewhere. GalacticShoe (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For all of these which are not listed as always composite or having a prime, I tested   and didn't find any primes.
  1. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  , and   when  , so when there is such a prime then  . Thanks to RDBury for helping establish compositeness originally for  .
  2. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  3. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  4. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  5. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  , and   when  .
  6. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  7. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  8. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  9. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  ,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  10. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  ,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  11. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   and   when  , and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even, so if there is such a prime then  .
  12. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  13. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is even, so if there is such a prime then   is odd.
  14. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when  , and it becomes a difference of cubes if  , so when there is such a prime then  .
  15. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  16. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  17. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  18. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  19. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  ,   when  ,   when  ,   when  , and   when  , so when there is such a prime then  .
  20. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  , and   when  , so when there is such a prime then  .
  21. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  , and   when   so when there is such a prime then  .
  22. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  23. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  24. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  25. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  26. Prime:   is probably prime. Note that   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  , and   when  , so when there is such a prime then  .
  27. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  28. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  29. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  30. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  31. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  32. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  33. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  ,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  34. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  35. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  36. Always composite:   can be factorized.
  37. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  38. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd and   when   is even.
  39. Unknown:   is divisible by   when   is odd,   when  , and   when  , so if there is such a prime then  .
  40. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is even,   when  , and   when  .
  41. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
  42. Always composite:   is divisible by   when   is odd, and it becomes a difference of squares if   is even.
GalacticShoe (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing this is about the best one can do without actually discovering that some of the values are prime. I did some number crunching on the first sequence 5n+788 with n<1000. All have factors less than 10000 except for n = 87, 111, 147, 207, 231, 319, 351, 387, 471, 487, 499, 531, 547, 567, 591, 639, 687, 831, 919, 979. You can add more test primes to the list, for example if n%30 = 1 then 5n+788 is a multiple of 61, but nothing seems to eliminate all possible n. Wolfram Alpha says the smallest factor of 587+788 is 1231241858423, so it's probably not feasible to carry on without something more sophisticated than trial division. --RDBury (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, RDBury. I've been using Alpertron, it's good at rapidly factorizing or finding low prime factors. GalacticShoe (talk) 22:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Alpertron is very good and you can give it a file to factor, or specify a formula to factor. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lines carrying rays

edit

Not quite sure where to ask this but I decided to put it here. I apologize if this doesn't belong here.

I was recently reading about hyperbolic geometry and when reading the article Limiting parallel, I came across the statement "Distinct lines carrying limiting parallel rays do not meet." What exactly does it mean for a line to carry a ray? Is this standard mathematical terminology? TypoEater (talk) 18:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is the place for such a question, though you might also complain at Talk:Limiting parallel that the phrase is unclear. —Tamfang (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I find the whole article unclear and confusing. Is it me?  --Lambiam 23:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]