Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 January 29
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< January 28 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 30 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
January 29
editList of factorization of 2n-1
editIs there a list of factorizations available of 2n-1 for n up to about 175? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Funny enough, I found such a list embedded in somebody's Python file on Github. Here ya go. GalacticShoe (talk) 04:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a million! It is missing a few, starting at n=193, but I believe that is sufficient for my needs. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- For future reference, the missing values of (up to 256) are 193, 211, 227, 229, 251, 253; attempting to factor them with WolframAlpha shows that indeed the composite numbers that need to be factored are very large. GalacticShoe (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, apparently they were using their own program to factor them, until they got to a certain size, then they switched to using Wolfram Alpha, which did most of the rest, except for ones that took too long. ~~
- For future reference, the missing values of (up to 256) are 193, 211, 227, 229, 251, 253; attempting to factor them with WolframAlpha shows that indeed the composite numbers that need to be factored are very large. GalacticShoe (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a million! It is missing a few, starting at n=193, but I believe that is sufficient for my needs. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I also found this page with a list up to 263: [1]. It has a dead link for "more data", but you can find it on the Wayback Machine: [2]. This page has some very extensive data products such as [3] with an explanation of the format [4]. For 193 it lists:
M( 193 )C: 13821503 M( 193 )C: 61654440233248340616559 M( 193 )D
- The text on the page notes that "the largest prime factor is almost always implied, as some of them are _very_ large". --Amble (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll look at that. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 00:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- See the Cunningham table: [5], also this list 210.244.72.152 (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Followup remark: I implemented this in a program, to look up these factorizations rather than factor them each time. I did a test and it was 62x faster, so it can do in a minute what would take an hour, etc. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 10:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bubba73: http://factordb.com has a database with billions of known prime factors of various numbers. It accepts expressions like 2^253-1. You can also enter 2^n-1 and get a list of factorizations. Composite factors are blue. 2^1277-1 is the smallest without a known factor so the whole number is listed in blue. I don't know whether there are smaller numbers with a partial but not full factorization. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I didn't know about that. I needed a table of complete factorizations for four types of numbers. I got what I need with my own program on three of them, but 2^n-1 bogged down about n=139. But I got it up to n=192 from the source somewhere above, which I think will be sufficient. But if it turns out that I need more, I can use this. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
@PrimeHunter: At factordb.com, can you enter a series and loop on that? That is, if is the sum of a series up to n, can you get the factors of , for n = 1 to x? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Bubba73: I don't think so. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)