Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2020 January 11

Mathematics desk
< January 10 << Dec | January | Feb >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 11

edit

Number of regions in regular polygon with diagonals drawn

edit

Hi. At https://oeis.org/A007678 there is a Mathematica formula that is said to generate the stated sequence, but I am curious to know whether this really does work for any n, however large. As you can see, the formula incorporates a number of special-case divisibility tests, but these stop at 210. Intuitively I would think these special cases would have to go on indefinitely for larger and larger n, but I could be wrong. Note that the adjacent "PARI" formula works only for odd n (which is the "easy" case), although it does not actually say this. This doesn't give me full confidence that any restrictions on the Mathematica formula would necessarily be mentioned either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:4B91:AB00:995C:88E4:F919:7EE4 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See this paper of Poonen and Rubinstein. --JBL (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. I'm glad that I did not try to work this out myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:4B91:AB00:995C:88E4:F919:7EE4 (talk) 01:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
See Langley’s Adventitious Angles#Generalization for a bit more on this. Turns out, though it's not obvious why, that this problem is equivalent to the problem of finding adventitious quadrilaterals. --RDBury (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]