Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2017 December 9

Mathematics desk
< December 8 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 10 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


December 9 edit

Sines in a triangle edit

Let ABC be a triangle and O a point in the interior, then sin ∠BAO sin ∠CBO sin ∠ACO = sin ∠OAC sin ∠OBA sin ∠OCB. This isn't hard to prove being an application of the Law of Sines, and I assume it's well known, so does anyone know a reference for it? --RDBury (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked at Law of sines? Dolphin (t) 20:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That article seems to only cover a simple triangle, but what I'm looking for is more a relation between the angles in a complete quadrangle. Besides, the Law of Sines is certainly not the only way to prove the relation. It seems to be similar to Ceva's theorem but using sines, I don't see the exact connection though. --RDBury (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now I see the connection to Ceva's theorem. In fact, the relations seems to be known as the 'trigonometric form of Ceva's theorem'. I found a reference on p66 (equation 10) of Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society vol XX (1901-1902) but it's not given a name there. I'd still be interested to know if there is an earlier or more definitive reference though. --RDBury (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@RDBury: The article indeed covers a single triangle, but we have just three single triangles here. Consider the ABO triangle:  , which implies  . Similary from triangles BCO and CAO we have   and  . Multiply all three equalities side-wise ad we get:
 
All line segments' lengths will get reduced and the claimed equality gets proven. --CiaPan (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's pretty much the proof I had in mind, but it's not covered in the article other than you're using the theorem that the article is about. Like I said, it's not hard to prove but you need to say more than just "By the law of sines." The problem I was having was finding a reference since it was too easy not to be already known. --RDBury (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@RDBury: Oh, I see. I apologise, I must have misunderstood you. It was obvious to me that the Dolphin's comment was just a hint, and I was surprised you seemingly didn't get the hint and expect the page contains an exhaustive answer to the problem. :) --CiaPan (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]