Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 August 30

Mathematics desk
< August 29 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 31 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


August 30

edit

Every nonfinitely generated abelian group must contain one of... (resumed)

edit

I asked this question, and got one useless response (that misunderstood the question). Here it is my question, slightly revised to clarify, and my attempt to answer my own question.

Is there any list of relatively simple nonfinitely generated abelian groups, such that any arbitrary nonfinitely generated abelian group must contain one of the groups in the list as a subgroup?

An attempt to answer my own question. I believe the following is such a list, except I'm unsure about the last point. Let   be an abelian group:

Case 1:   contains an infinite sequence of divisible elements, ie, a sequence   such that  . Then   is isomorphic to a subgroup of   or  .

Case 2:   does not contain such an infinite sequence, and its torsion group is not finitely generated. Then by CRT, only finitely many primes occur as the order of some element, because otherwise every finite order element is divisible. One of those primes must occur infinitely often, because the elements of order   generate the torsion subgroup, again by CRT, and if, for such a prime  , there are only finitely many elements of order  , then it's not to difficult to show, using the classification of finitely generated abelian groups, that there must be an element of order   which begins a sequence of the form in case 1. Then countably infinitely many elements of order   generate a vector space over   of countably infinite dimension - ie,  .

Case 3: Otherwise, must   necessarily contain a direct sum of countably many copies of  ?

Thanks for anyone who happens to know, or be able to work through the math and make any additional arguments necessary! --70.116.7.160 (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to the “Case 3” question is no: for any finite n > 1, there are infinitely generated torsion-free abelian groups of rank n with no infinitely generated subgroup of smaller rank (which in particular implies that there is no infinite descending divisor chain). For a concrete example, consider the subgroup of   generated by   and by the elements  ,  . (The general pattern is given below, (6).)
I don’t have the time now to write a detailed proof, but I will sketch a (hopefully) complete classification. Let A be an infinitely generated abelian group:
  • First, assume that its torsion subgroup   is infinite (= infinitely generated). If the p-torsion subgroup Ap is nontrivial for infinitely many p, then A contains a subgroup isomorphic to
 
where I is an infinite set of primes. Otherwise, Ap is infinite for some prime p. If there are infinitely many elements of order p, then A contains
 
(the direct sum of countably many copies of  ). Otherwise, for every   there are only finitely many   such that  ; since Ap is infinite, König’s lemma implies that there is an infinite chain   such that  ,  , and  . Then   is isomorphic to the Prüfer group
 
  • The other case is that   is finite. Then   is an infinitely generated torsion-free group. In fact, by successively chosing suitable elements   such that   is not in  , one can show that A itself includes an infinitely generated torsion-free subgroup. Thus, we can assume without loss of generality that A is torsion-free.
If A has infinite rank, its injective envelope is a vector space over   of infinite dimension. If we choose an infinite linearly independent set, which we may assume to lie in A, we see that A contains a copy of
 
If A has finite rank, let n be the minimal rank of its infinitely generated subgroup. We may assume that A itself has rank n. Its injective envelope is a  -vector space of dimension n, and A includes n linearly independent elements, hence we may assume that  . The quotient   is an infinite torsion group contained in  , hence by the previous part, it contains a copy of (1) or (3). In the former case, A contains a subgroup of   of the form
 
where I is an infinite set of primes, and for each  ,   is such that not all coordinates of ap are divisible by p. Moreover, all infinitely generated subgroups of this group have rank n; one can show that this condition is equivalent to the statement that for every linear function  , where   and  , there are only finitely many   such that  . In particular, we may assume that all coordinates of every ap are coprime to p.
The remaining case is that   includes a copy of  . Let   denote p-adic integers, and   its fraction field of p-adic numbers. For  , let me write  , so that   and  . Moreover, if  , I’ll write   for the coordinate-wise application of Frac. Using this notation, it is not hard to show that A contains a subgroup of   of the form
 
where  . Again, additionally all infinitely generated subgroups of this group have rank n, which is equivalent to the condition that the n coordinates of a, as elements of  , are linearly independent over  .
Note that for n = 1, cases (5) and (6) reduce to the groups   and  , respectively, which, as subgroups of  , belong to your Case 1. However, for n > 1 the groups are new.—Emil J. 13:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I think I understood the first half of your classification perfectly, and I'll need to do a bit of research to get the background to pin down the latter parts of it. --70.116.7.160 (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  Resolved