Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2010 November 30

Mathematics desk
< November 29 << Oct | November | Dec >> December 1 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 30

edit

Graph Ramsey Theory

edit

I wish to study Graph Ramsey Theory on my own. What books or material should I read to develop a thorough grasp of this. All my searches have yielded books on Graph Theory which have at most a section (not even a chapter) dedicated to Graph Ramsey theory. Can someone name any good resources from where I can learn independently. Thanks-Shahab (talk) 09:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Symmetric Matrix

edit

I have to show, given a symmetric matrix S such that S raised to the power k is the identity, k greater than or equal to one, that S squared is necessarily the identity. I haven't got a clue where to start with this one. Can someone give me some help? Thanks 131.111.163.135 (talk) 14:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about real-valued matrices, as otherwise it's not even true. Then the property follows easily from the fact that real symmetric matrices are diagonalizable.—Emil J. 14:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I forgot to mention that it's a real matrix. So I just need some non-singular matrix P st   where D is a diagonal matrix then? And I can pick a P st D has entries plus or minus one on the diagonal? Thanks. 131.111.163.135 (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You actually need P−1SP = D. (You can in fact pick P so that P−1 = PT, but that's irrelevant here.) Then Dk = P−1SkP = I, which forces D to have ±1 on the diagonal (as there are no other roots of unity in R).—Emil J. 15:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]