Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2010 July 4
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< July 3 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 5 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
July 4
editWhat no questions today? Is everyone taking a holiday? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.192.187 (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've done an IP lookup on the last 4 anons who posted questions here. Two are from Australia, one from UK and one from Germany. This suggests that a lot less people ascribe special significance to the 4th of July than you'd think. Also, the day is still young, of course. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Second Order Differential Equations
editHi. I'm currently working through a course on DEs and now have some SODEs to solve, two examples being:
subject to y(0)=y'(0)=0 and y(t), y'(t) continuous at
and
subject to y being bounded as , with being the Dirac delta function.
My problems are as follows. For each SODE I can find the complementary function and with the first one, I can find the particular integral in the cases , and but I don't know how to ensure that the solution is continuous at pi and 2pi. Then, for the second one, I haven't got a clue what to try for the particular integral. Am I supposed to do it in the same fashion as I did for the Heaviside step function and consider what happens for x=a and x≠a separately? Thanks 92.11.130.6 (talk) 15:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Partial Derivatives
editA quick one on PDs. If we set and subject to u(x,y)=v(s,t), I have to find and in terms of x, y, and .
Via the chain rule I get that = and = . Is this correct? I then have to find . Do I do this by finding ? It's quite messy when I try it and so I doubt I'm going about this the right way. Thanks 92.11.130.6 (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hint: y+ix=e−s+it. Bo Jacoby (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC).
- Thanks, I hadn't actually spotted that and it's quite clever, but the final part of the question is about finding a partial differential equation for v, so I'm not allowed to know what the function is yet. 92.11.130.6 (talk) 10:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Never mind, think I've got this one now. 92.11.130.6 (talk) 14:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)